Cargando…

Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient setup accuracy and quantify individual and cumulative positioning uncertainties associated with different hardware and software components of the stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system. A statistical model is used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keeling, Vance, Hossain, Sabbir, Jin, Hosang, Algan, Ozer, Ahmad, Salahuddin, Ali, Imad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5959
_version_ 1783279692771491840
author Keeling, Vance
Hossain, Sabbir
Jin, Hosang
Algan, Ozer
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Ali, Imad
author_facet Keeling, Vance
Hossain, Sabbir
Jin, Hosang
Algan, Ozer
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Ali, Imad
author_sort Keeling, Vance
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient setup accuracy and quantify individual and cumulative positioning uncertainties associated with different hardware and software components of the stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system. A statistical model is used to evaluate positioning uncertainties of the different components of SRS/SRT treatment with the Brainlab 6D ExacTrac system using the positioning shifts of 35 patients having cranial lesions. All these patients are immobilized with rigid head‐and‐neck masks, simulated with Brainlab localizer and planned with iPlan treatment planning system. Stereoscopic X‐ray images (XC) are acquired and registered to corresponding digitally reconstructed radiographs using bony‐anatomy matching to calculate 6D translational and rotational shifts. When the shifts are within tolerance (0.7 mm and 1°), treatment is initiated. Otherwise corrections are applied and additional X‐rays (XV) are acquired to verify that patient position is within tolerance. The uncertainties from the mask, localizer, IR ‐frame, X‐ray imaging, MV, and kV isocentricity are quantified individually. Mask uncertainty (translational: lateral, longitudinal, vertical; rotational: pitch, roll, yaw) is the largest and varies with patients in the range [Formula: see text] obtained from mean of XC shifts for each patient. Setup uncertainty in IR positioning (0.88, 2.12, 1.40 mm, and 0.64°, 0.83°, 0.96°) is extracted from standard deviation of XC. Systematic uncertainties of the frame (0.18, 0.25, [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , 0.18°, and 0.47°) and localizer ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , 0.03 mm, and [Formula: see text] , 0.00°, [Formula: see text]) are extracted from means of all XV setups and mean of all XC distributions, respectively. Uncertainties in isocentricity of the MV radiotherapy machine are (0.27, 0.24, 0.34 mm) and kV imager (0.15, [Formula: see text] , 0.21 mm). A statistical model is developed to evaluate the individual and cumulative systematic and random positioning uncertainties induced by the different hardware and software components of the 6D ExacTrac system. The uncertainties from the mask, localizer, IR frame, X‐ray imaging, couch, MV linac, and kV imager isocentricity are quantified using statistical modeling. PACS number(s): 87.56.B‐, 87.59.B‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56909152018-04-02 Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling Keeling, Vance Hossain, Sabbir Jin, Hosang Algan, Ozer Ahmad, Salahuddin Ali, Imad J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient setup accuracy and quantify individual and cumulative positioning uncertainties associated with different hardware and software components of the stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system. A statistical model is used to evaluate positioning uncertainties of the different components of SRS/SRT treatment with the Brainlab 6D ExacTrac system using the positioning shifts of 35 patients having cranial lesions. All these patients are immobilized with rigid head‐and‐neck masks, simulated with Brainlab localizer and planned with iPlan treatment planning system. Stereoscopic X‐ray images (XC) are acquired and registered to corresponding digitally reconstructed radiographs using bony‐anatomy matching to calculate 6D translational and rotational shifts. When the shifts are within tolerance (0.7 mm and 1°), treatment is initiated. Otherwise corrections are applied and additional X‐rays (XV) are acquired to verify that patient position is within tolerance. The uncertainties from the mask, localizer, IR ‐frame, X‐ray imaging, MV, and kV isocentricity are quantified individually. Mask uncertainty (translational: lateral, longitudinal, vertical; rotational: pitch, roll, yaw) is the largest and varies with patients in the range [Formula: see text] obtained from mean of XC shifts for each patient. Setup uncertainty in IR positioning (0.88, 2.12, 1.40 mm, and 0.64°, 0.83°, 0.96°) is extracted from standard deviation of XC. Systematic uncertainties of the frame (0.18, 0.25, [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , 0.18°, and 0.47°) and localizer ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , 0.03 mm, and [Formula: see text] , 0.00°, [Formula: see text]) are extracted from means of all XV setups and mean of all XC distributions, respectively. Uncertainties in isocentricity of the MV radiotherapy machine are (0.27, 0.24, 0.34 mm) and kV imager (0.15, [Formula: see text] , 0.21 mm). A statistical model is developed to evaluate the individual and cumulative systematic and random positioning uncertainties induced by the different hardware and software components of the 6D ExacTrac system. The uncertainties from the mask, localizer, IR frame, X‐ray imaging, couch, MV linac, and kV imager isocentricity are quantified using statistical modeling. PACS number(s): 87.56.B‐, 87.59.B‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690915/ /pubmed/27167267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5959 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Keeling, Vance
Hossain, Sabbir
Jin, Hosang
Algan, Ozer
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Ali, Imad
Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling
title Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling
title_full Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling
title_fullStr Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling
title_short Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling
title_sort quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6d exactrac system using statistical modeling
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5959
work_keys_str_mv AT keelingvance quantitativeevaluationofpatientsetupuncertaintyofstereotacticradiotherapywiththeframeless6dexactracsystemusingstatisticalmodeling
AT hossainsabbir quantitativeevaluationofpatientsetupuncertaintyofstereotacticradiotherapywiththeframeless6dexactracsystemusingstatisticalmodeling
AT jinhosang quantitativeevaluationofpatientsetupuncertaintyofstereotacticradiotherapywiththeframeless6dexactracsystemusingstatisticalmodeling
AT alganozer quantitativeevaluationofpatientsetupuncertaintyofstereotacticradiotherapywiththeframeless6dexactracsystemusingstatisticalmodeling
AT ahmadsalahuddin quantitativeevaluationofpatientsetupuncertaintyofstereotacticradiotherapywiththeframeless6dexactracsystemusingstatisticalmodeling
AT aliimad quantitativeevaluationofpatientsetupuncertaintyofstereotacticradiotherapywiththeframeless6dexactracsystemusingstatisticalmodeling