Cargando…

Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3

This study investigates an X‐ray dose measurement method for computed tomography using Gafchromic films. Nonuniformity of the active layer is a major problem in Gafchromic films. In radiotherapy, nonuniformity error is reduced by applying the double‐exposure technique, but this is impractical in dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katsuda, Toshizo, Gotanda, Rumi, Gotanda, Tatsuhiro, Akagawa, Takuya, Tanki, Nobuyoshi, Kuwano, Tadao, Yabunaka, Kouichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5862
_version_ 1783279693011615744
author Katsuda, Toshizo
Gotanda, Rumi
Gotanda, Tatsuhiro
Akagawa, Takuya
Tanki, Nobuyoshi
Kuwano, Tadao
Yabunaka, Kouichi
author_facet Katsuda, Toshizo
Gotanda, Rumi
Gotanda, Tatsuhiro
Akagawa, Takuya
Tanki, Nobuyoshi
Kuwano, Tadao
Yabunaka, Kouichi
author_sort Katsuda, Toshizo
collection PubMed
description This study investigates an X‐ray dose measurement method for computed tomography using Gafchromic films. Nonuniformity of the active layer is a major problem in Gafchromic films. In radiotherapy, nonuniformity error is reduced by applying the double‐exposure technique, but this is impractical in diagnostic radiology because of the heel effect. Therefore, we propose replacing the X‐rays in the double‐exposure technique with ultraviolet (UV)‐A irradiation of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3. To improve the reproducibility of the scan position, Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films were attached to a 3‐mm‐thick acrylic plate. The samples were then irradiated with a 10 W UV‐A fluorescent lamp placed at a distance of 72 cm for 30, 60, and 90 minutes. The profile curves were evaluated along the long and short axes of the film center, and the standard deviations of the pixel values were calculated over large areas of the films. Paired t‐test was performed. UV‐A irradiation exerted a significant effect on Gafchromic EBT2 (paired t‐test; [Formula: see text]) but not on EBT3 (paired t‐test; [Formula: see text]). Similarly, the homogeneity was improved in Gafchromic EBT2 but not in EBT3. Therefore, the double‐exposure technique under UV‐A irradiation is suitable only for EBT2 films. PACS number(s): 87.53 Bn
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56909162018-04-02 Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 Katsuda, Toshizo Gotanda, Rumi Gotanda, Tatsuhiro Akagawa, Takuya Tanki, Nobuyoshi Kuwano, Tadao Yabunaka, Kouichi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study investigates an X‐ray dose measurement method for computed tomography using Gafchromic films. Nonuniformity of the active layer is a major problem in Gafchromic films. In radiotherapy, nonuniformity error is reduced by applying the double‐exposure technique, but this is impractical in diagnostic radiology because of the heel effect. Therefore, we propose replacing the X‐rays in the double‐exposure technique with ultraviolet (UV)‐A irradiation of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3. To improve the reproducibility of the scan position, Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films were attached to a 3‐mm‐thick acrylic plate. The samples were then irradiated with a 10 W UV‐A fluorescent lamp placed at a distance of 72 cm for 30, 60, and 90 minutes. The profile curves were evaluated along the long and short axes of the film center, and the standard deviations of the pixel values were calculated over large areas of the films. Paired t‐test was performed. UV‐A irradiation exerted a significant effect on Gafchromic EBT2 (paired t‐test; [Formula: see text]) but not on EBT3 (paired t‐test; [Formula: see text]). Similarly, the homogeneity was improved in Gafchromic EBT2 but not in EBT3. Therefore, the double‐exposure technique under UV‐A irradiation is suitable only for EBT2 films. PACS number(s): 87.53 Bn John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690916/ /pubmed/27167258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5862 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Katsuda, Toshizo
Gotanda, Rumi
Gotanda, Tatsuhiro
Akagawa, Takuya
Tanki, Nobuyoshi
Kuwano, Tadao
Yabunaka, Kouichi
Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3
title Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3
title_full Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3
title_fullStr Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3
title_full_unstemmed Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3
title_short Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3
title_sort correction of nonuniformity error of gafchromic ebt2 and ebt3
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5862
work_keys_str_mv AT katsudatoshizo correctionofnonuniformityerrorofgafchromicebt2andebt3
AT gotandarumi correctionofnonuniformityerrorofgafchromicebt2andebt3
AT gotandatatsuhiro correctionofnonuniformityerrorofgafchromicebt2andebt3
AT akagawatakuya correctionofnonuniformityerrorofgafchromicebt2andebt3
AT tankinobuyoshi correctionofnonuniformityerrorofgafchromicebt2andebt3
AT kuwanotadao correctionofnonuniformityerrorofgafchromicebt2andebt3
AT yabunakakouichi correctionofnonuniformityerrorofgafchromicebt2andebt3