Assessment of diffusion tensor image quality across sites and vendors using the American College of Radiology head phantom

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of assessing quality of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) from multiple sites and vendors using American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. Participating sites (Siemens [Formula: see text] , GE [Formula: see text] , and Philips [Formula: see text]) reached consensus on parameters for DTI and used the widely available ACR phantom. Tensor data were processed at one site. [Formula: see text] and eddy current distortions were assessed using grid line displacement on phantom Slice 5; signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) was measured at the center and periphery of the [Formula: see text] image; fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were assessed using phantom Slice 7. Variations of acquisition parameters and deviations from specified sequence parameters were recorded. Nonlinear grid line distortion was higher with linear shimming and could be corrected using the 2nd order shimming. Following image registration, eddy current distortion was consistently smaller than acquisition voxel size. SNR was consistently higher in the image periphery than center by a factor of 1.3–2.0. ROI‐based FA ranged from 0.007 to 0.024. ROI‐based MD ranged from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. Two sites had image void artifacts. The ACR phantom can be used to compare key quality measures of diffusion images acquired from multiple vendors at multiple sites. PACS number(s): 87.57.‐s, 87.19.lf