Cargando…

Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system

The dose measurements of the small field sizes, such as conical collimators used in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), are a significant challenge due to many factors including source occlusion, detector size limitation, and lack of lateral electronic equilibrium. One useful tool in dealing with the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Jason Y., Ning, Holly, Arora, Barbara C., Zhuge, Ying, Miller, Robert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5956
_version_ 1783279696368107520
author Cheng, Jason Y.
Ning, Holly
Arora, Barbara C.
Zhuge, Ying
Miller, Robert W.
author_facet Cheng, Jason Y.
Ning, Holly
Arora, Barbara C.
Zhuge, Ying
Miller, Robert W.
author_sort Cheng, Jason Y.
collection PubMed
description The dose measurements of the small field sizes, such as conical collimators used in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), are a significant challenge due to many factors including source occlusion, detector size limitation, and lack of lateral electronic equilibrium. One useful tool in dealing with the small field effect is Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. In this study, we report a comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and measurements of output factors for the Varian SRS system with conical collimators for energies of 6 MV flattening filter‐free (6 MV) and 10 MV flattening filter‐free (10 MV) on the TrueBeam accelerator. Monte Carlo simulations of Varian's SRS system for 6 MV and 10 MV photon energies with cones sizes of 17.5 mm, 15.0 mm, 12.5 mm, 10.0 mm, 7.5 mm, 5.0 mm, and 4.0 mm were performed using EGSnrc (release V4 2.4.0) codes. Varian's version‐2 phase‐space files for 6 MV and 10 MV of TrueBeam accelerator were utilized in the Monte Carlo simulations. Two small diode detectors Edge (Sun Nuclear) and Small Field Detector (SFD) (IBA Dosimetry) were applied to measure the output factors. Significant errors may result if detector correction factors are not applied to small field dosimetric measurements. Although it lacked the machine‐specific [Formula: see text] correction factors for diode detectors in this study, correction factors were applied utilizing published studies conducted under similar conditions. For cone diameters greater than or equal to 12.5 mm, the differences between output factors for the Edge detector, SFD detector, and MC simulations are within 3.0% for both energies. For cone diameters below 12.5 mm, output factors differences exhibit greater variations. PACS number(s): 87.55.k, 87.55.Qr
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56909312018-04-02 Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system Cheng, Jason Y. Ning, Holly Arora, Barbara C. Zhuge, Ying Miller, Robert W. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The dose measurements of the small field sizes, such as conical collimators used in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), are a significant challenge due to many factors including source occlusion, detector size limitation, and lack of lateral electronic equilibrium. One useful tool in dealing with the small field effect is Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. In this study, we report a comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and measurements of output factors for the Varian SRS system with conical collimators for energies of 6 MV flattening filter‐free (6 MV) and 10 MV flattening filter‐free (10 MV) on the TrueBeam accelerator. Monte Carlo simulations of Varian's SRS system for 6 MV and 10 MV photon energies with cones sizes of 17.5 mm, 15.0 mm, 12.5 mm, 10.0 mm, 7.5 mm, 5.0 mm, and 4.0 mm were performed using EGSnrc (release V4 2.4.0) codes. Varian's version‐2 phase‐space files for 6 MV and 10 MV of TrueBeam accelerator were utilized in the Monte Carlo simulations. Two small diode detectors Edge (Sun Nuclear) and Small Field Detector (SFD) (IBA Dosimetry) were applied to measure the output factors. Significant errors may result if detector correction factors are not applied to small field dosimetric measurements. Although it lacked the machine‐specific [Formula: see text] correction factors for diode detectors in this study, correction factors were applied utilizing published studies conducted under similar conditions. For cone diameters greater than or equal to 12.5 mm, the differences between output factors for the Edge detector, SFD detector, and MC simulations are within 3.0% for both energies. For cone diameters below 12.5 mm, output factors differences exhibit greater variations. PACS number(s): 87.55.k, 87.55.Qr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690931/ /pubmed/27167266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5956 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Cheng, Jason Y.
Ning, Holly
Arora, Barbara C.
Zhuge, Ying
Miller, Robert W.
Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system
title Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system
title_full Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system
title_fullStr Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system
title_full_unstemmed Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system
title_short Output factor comparison of Monte Carlo and measurement for Varian TrueBeam 6 MV and 10 MV flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system
title_sort output factor comparison of monte carlo and measurement for varian truebeam 6 mv and 10 mv flattening filter‐free stereotactic radiosurgery system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5956
work_keys_str_mv AT chengjasony outputfactorcomparisonofmontecarloandmeasurementforvariantruebeam6mvand10mvflatteningfilterfreestereotacticradiosurgerysystem
AT ningholly outputfactorcomparisonofmontecarloandmeasurementforvariantruebeam6mvand10mvflatteningfilterfreestereotacticradiosurgerysystem
AT arorabarbarac outputfactorcomparisonofmontecarloandmeasurementforvariantruebeam6mvand10mvflatteningfilterfreestereotacticradiosurgerysystem
AT zhugeying outputfactorcomparisonofmontecarloandmeasurementforvariantruebeam6mvand10mvflatteningfilterfreestereotacticradiosurgerysystem
AT millerrobertw outputfactorcomparisonofmontecarloandmeasurementforvariantruebeam6mvand10mvflatteningfilterfreestereotacticradiosurgerysystem