Cargando…
Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions
Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences allow physicians to define the dominant intraprostatic lesion (IPL) in prostate radiation therapy treatments allowing for dose escalation and potentially increased tumor control. This work quantifies the margin required around the MRI‐defined IP...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6089 |
_version_ | 1783279696600891392 |
---|---|
author | Studenski, Matthew T. Valenciaga, Yanisley Abramowitz, Matthew C. Stoyanova, Radka Bossart, Elizabeth Dogan, Nesrin Pollack, Alan |
author_facet | Studenski, Matthew T. Valenciaga, Yanisley Abramowitz, Matthew C. Stoyanova, Radka Bossart, Elizabeth Dogan, Nesrin Pollack, Alan |
author_sort | Studenski, Matthew T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences allow physicians to define the dominant intraprostatic lesion (IPL) in prostate radiation therapy treatments allowing for dose escalation and potentially increased tumor control. This work quantifies the margin required around the MRI‐defined IPL accounting for both prostate motion and deformation. Ten patients treated with a simultaneous integrated intraprostatic boost (SIIB) were retrospectively selected and replanned with incremental 1 mm margins from 0‐5 mm around the IPL to determine if there were any significant differences in dosimetric parameters. Sensitivity analysis was then performed accounting for random and systematic uncertainties in both prostate motion and deformation to ensure adequate dose was delivered to the IPL. Prostate deformation was assessed using daily CBCT imaging and implanted fiducial markers. The average IPL volume without margin was 2.3% of the PTV volume and increased to 11.8% with a 5 mm margin. Despite these changes in volume, the only statistically significant dosimetric difference was found for the PTV maximum dose, which increased with increasing margin. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that a 3.0 mm margin ensures [Formula: see text] IPL coverage accounting for both motion and deformation. We found that a margin of 3.0 mm around the MRI defined IPL is sufficient to account for random and systematic errors in IPL position for the majority of cases. PACS number(s): 87.55.de |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56909322018-04-02 Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions Studenski, Matthew T. Valenciaga, Yanisley Abramowitz, Matthew C. Stoyanova, Radka Bossart, Elizabeth Dogan, Nesrin Pollack, Alan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences allow physicians to define the dominant intraprostatic lesion (IPL) in prostate radiation therapy treatments allowing for dose escalation and potentially increased tumor control. This work quantifies the margin required around the MRI‐defined IPL accounting for both prostate motion and deformation. Ten patients treated with a simultaneous integrated intraprostatic boost (SIIB) were retrospectively selected and replanned with incremental 1 mm margins from 0‐5 mm around the IPL to determine if there were any significant differences in dosimetric parameters. Sensitivity analysis was then performed accounting for random and systematic uncertainties in both prostate motion and deformation to ensure adequate dose was delivered to the IPL. Prostate deformation was assessed using daily CBCT imaging and implanted fiducial markers. The average IPL volume without margin was 2.3% of the PTV volume and increased to 11.8% with a 5 mm margin. Despite these changes in volume, the only statistically significant dosimetric difference was found for the PTV maximum dose, which increased with increasing margin. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that a 3.0 mm margin ensures [Formula: see text] IPL coverage accounting for both motion and deformation. We found that a margin of 3.0 mm around the MRI defined IPL is sufficient to account for random and systematic errors in IPL position for the majority of cases. PACS number(s): 87.55.de John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690932/ /pubmed/27167286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6089 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Studenski, Matthew T. Valenciaga, Yanisley Abramowitz, Matthew C. Stoyanova, Radka Bossart, Elizabeth Dogan, Nesrin Pollack, Alan Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions |
title | Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions |
title_full | Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions |
title_fullStr | Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions |
title_short | Quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions |
title_sort | quantification of the margin required for treating intraprostatic lesions |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT studenskimatthewt quantificationofthemarginrequiredfortreatingintraprostaticlesions AT valenciagayanisley quantificationofthemarginrequiredfortreatingintraprostaticlesions AT abramowitzmatthewc quantificationofthemarginrequiredfortreatingintraprostaticlesions AT stoyanovaradka quantificationofthemarginrequiredfortreatingintraprostaticlesions AT bossartelizabeth quantificationofthemarginrequiredfortreatingintraprostaticlesions AT dogannesrin quantificationofthemarginrequiredfortreatingintraprostaticlesions AT pollackalan quantificationofthemarginrequiredfortreatingintraprostaticlesions |