Cargando…

Ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study

The aim of the present Monte Carlo study is to evaluate the variation of energy deposition in healthy tissues in the human eye which is irradiated by brachytherapy sources in comparison with the resultant dose increase in the gold nanoparticle (GNP)‐loaded choroidal melanoma. The effects of these na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asadi, Somayeh, Vaez‐zadeh, Mehdi, Vahidian, Mohammad, Marghchouei, Mahdieh, Masoudi, S. Farhad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5945
_version_ 1783279696842063872
author Asadi, Somayeh
Vaez‐zadeh, Mehdi
Vahidian, Mohammad
Marghchouei, Mahdieh
Masoudi, S. Farhad
author_facet Asadi, Somayeh
Vaez‐zadeh, Mehdi
Vahidian, Mohammad
Marghchouei, Mahdieh
Masoudi, S. Farhad
author_sort Asadi, Somayeh
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present Monte Carlo study is to evaluate the variation of energy deposition in healthy tissues in the human eye which is irradiated by brachytherapy sources in comparison with the resultant dose increase in the gold nanoparticle (GNP)‐loaded choroidal melanoma. The effects of these nanoparticles on normal tissues are compared between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] as two ophthalmic brachytherapy sources. Dose distribution in the tumor and healthy tissues has been taken into account for both brachytherapy sources. Also, in certain points of the eye, the ratio of the absorbed dose by the normal tissue in the presence of GNPs to the absorbed dose by the same point in the absence of GNPs has been calculated. In addition, differences of the absorbed dose in the tumor observed in the comparison of simple water phantom and actual simulated human eye in presence of GNPs are also a matter of interest that have been considered in the present work. The difference between the eye globe and the water phantom is more obvious for [Formula: see text] than that of the [Formula: see text] when the ophthalmic dosimetry is done in the presence of GNPs. Whenever these nanoparticles are utilized in enhancing the absorbed dose by the tumor, the use of [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source will greatly amplify the amount of dose enhancement factor (DEF) in the tumor site without inflicting much damage to healthy organs, when compared to the [Formula: see text] source. For instance, in the concentration of 30 mg GNPs, the difference amongst the calculated DEF for [Formula: see text] between these phantoms is 5.3%, while it is 2.45% for [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, in Monte Carlo studies of eye brachytherapy, more precise definition of the eye phantom instead of a water phantom will become increasingly important when we use [Formula: see text] as opposed to [Formula: see text]. PACS number(s): 87.53.Jw, 87.85.Rs, 87.10.Rt
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56909332018-04-02 Ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study Asadi, Somayeh Vaez‐zadeh, Mehdi Vahidian, Mohammad Marghchouei, Mahdieh Masoudi, S. Farhad J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The aim of the present Monte Carlo study is to evaluate the variation of energy deposition in healthy tissues in the human eye which is irradiated by brachytherapy sources in comparison with the resultant dose increase in the gold nanoparticle (GNP)‐loaded choroidal melanoma. The effects of these nanoparticles on normal tissues are compared between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] as two ophthalmic brachytherapy sources. Dose distribution in the tumor and healthy tissues has been taken into account for both brachytherapy sources. Also, in certain points of the eye, the ratio of the absorbed dose by the normal tissue in the presence of GNPs to the absorbed dose by the same point in the absence of GNPs has been calculated. In addition, differences of the absorbed dose in the tumor observed in the comparison of simple water phantom and actual simulated human eye in presence of GNPs are also a matter of interest that have been considered in the present work. The difference between the eye globe and the water phantom is more obvious for [Formula: see text] than that of the [Formula: see text] when the ophthalmic dosimetry is done in the presence of GNPs. Whenever these nanoparticles are utilized in enhancing the absorbed dose by the tumor, the use of [Formula: see text] brachytherapy source will greatly amplify the amount of dose enhancement factor (DEF) in the tumor site without inflicting much damage to healthy organs, when compared to the [Formula: see text] source. For instance, in the concentration of 30 mg GNPs, the difference amongst the calculated DEF for [Formula: see text] between these phantoms is 5.3%, while it is 2.45% for [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, in Monte Carlo studies of eye brachytherapy, more precise definition of the eye phantom instead of a water phantom will become increasingly important when we use [Formula: see text] as opposed to [Formula: see text]. PACS number(s): 87.53.Jw, 87.85.Rs, 87.10.Rt John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690933/ /pubmed/27167265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5945 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Asadi, Somayeh
Vaez‐zadeh, Mehdi
Vahidian, Mohammad
Marghchouei, Mahdieh
Masoudi, S. Farhad
Ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study
title Ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study
title_full Ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study
title_fullStr Ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study
title_full_unstemmed Ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study
title_short Ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a Monte Carlo study
title_sort ocular brachytherapy dosimetry for [formula: see text] and [formula: see text] in the presence of gold nanoparticles: a monte carlo study
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5945
work_keys_str_mv AT asadisomayeh ocularbrachytherapydosimetryforformulaseetextandformulaseetextinthepresenceofgoldnanoparticlesamontecarlostudy
AT vaezzadehmehdi ocularbrachytherapydosimetryforformulaseetextandformulaseetextinthepresenceofgoldnanoparticlesamontecarlostudy
AT vahidianmohammad ocularbrachytherapydosimetryforformulaseetextandformulaseetextinthepresenceofgoldnanoparticlesamontecarlostudy
AT marghchoueimahdieh ocularbrachytherapydosimetryforformulaseetextandformulaseetextinthepresenceofgoldnanoparticlesamontecarlostudy
AT masoudisfarhad ocularbrachytherapydosimetryforformulaseetextandformulaseetextinthepresenceofgoldnanoparticlesamontecarlostudy