Cargando…

Noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system

Noncoplanar fields are normally used to improve the dose conformity of the target while sparing organs at risk. One of the methods to verify the dose distribution from the noncoplanar fields is by comparing their planar dose distributions from the treatment planning system (TPS) and the measured one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yohannes, Indra, Prasetio, Heru, Bert, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5492
_version_ 1783279709014982656
author Yohannes, Indra
Prasetio, Heru
Bert, Christoph
author_facet Yohannes, Indra
Prasetio, Heru
Bert, Christoph
author_sort Yohannes, Indra
collection PubMed
description Noncoplanar fields are normally used to improve the dose conformity of the target while sparing organs at risk. One of the methods to verify the dose distribution from the noncoplanar fields is by comparing their planar dose distributions from the treatment planning system (TPS) and the measured ones; for example, using film or electronic portal imaging devices (EPID). The planar dose distributions of the measurement tools, that are normally perpendicular to the central axis of the beam, can be calculated by creating special structures to mimic them in the TPS. With TPS commercially available today, however, it is not easy to create these special structures, especially in the noncoplanar configuration. For this work, we have written in‐house scripts in the Pinnacle(3) TPS that can create the structures and define them as virtual planes. These virtual planes can be generated for any arbitrary gantry and couch angles, as well as source to planar distance, so that the planar dose maps at these planes can be computed. Two independent quality assurance (QA) tools were used to validate the planar dose distributions computed using the scripts for three open fields and one IMRT field at several different couch angles. The absolute planar dose patterns measured by the QA tools for all fields at all couch angles were found to be in good agreement, more than 95% (gamma criteria 3% delta dose and 3 mm distance to agreement), with the calculated ones by TPS. The results of this feasibility study can be valuable either for pretreatment dose verification or for in vivo dosimetry that directly implements the planar dose distributions from the TPS, particularly for the noncoplanar fields. PACS numbers: 87.55.de, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5691022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56910222018-04-02 Noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system Yohannes, Indra Prasetio, Heru Bert, Christoph J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Noncoplanar fields are normally used to improve the dose conformity of the target while sparing organs at risk. One of the methods to verify the dose distribution from the noncoplanar fields is by comparing their planar dose distributions from the treatment planning system (TPS) and the measured ones; for example, using film or electronic portal imaging devices (EPID). The planar dose distributions of the measurement tools, that are normally perpendicular to the central axis of the beam, can be calculated by creating special structures to mimic them in the TPS. With TPS commercially available today, however, it is not easy to create these special structures, especially in the noncoplanar configuration. For this work, we have written in‐house scripts in the Pinnacle(3) TPS that can create the structures and define them as virtual planes. These virtual planes can be generated for any arbitrary gantry and couch angles, as well as source to planar distance, so that the planar dose maps at these planes can be computed. Two independent quality assurance (QA) tools were used to validate the planar dose distributions computed using the scripts for three open fields and one IMRT field at several different couch angles. The absolute planar dose patterns measured by the QA tools for all fields at all couch angles were found to be in good agreement, more than 95% (gamma criteria 3% delta dose and 3 mm distance to agreement), with the calculated ones by TPS. The results of this feasibility study can be valuable either for pretreatment dose verification or for in vivo dosimetry that directly implements the planar dose distributions from the TPS, particularly for the noncoplanar fields. PACS numbers: 87.55.de, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5691022/ /pubmed/26699558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5492 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Yohannes, Indra
Prasetio, Heru
Bert, Christoph
Noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system
title Noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system
title_full Noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system
title_fullStr Noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system
title_full_unstemmed Noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system
title_short Noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using Philips' Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system
title_sort noncoplanar verification: a feasibility study using philips' pinnacle(3) treatment planning system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5492
work_keys_str_mv AT yohannesindra noncoplanarverificationafeasibilitystudyusingphilipspinnacle3treatmentplanningsystem
AT prasetioheru noncoplanarverificationafeasibilitystudyusingphilipspinnacle3treatmentplanningsystem
AT bertchristoph noncoplanarverificationafeasibilitystudyusingphilipspinnacle3treatmentplanningsystem