Cargando…

Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy

We present an institutional experience on the clinical implementation of magnetic resonance (MR)‐guided vaginal brachytherapy using commercially available solid applicator models. To test the fidelity of solid applicator models to digitize vaginal cylinder applicators, three datasets were evaluated....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owrangi, Amir M., Jolly, Shruti, Balter, James M., Cao, Yue, Maturen, Katherine E., Young, Lisa, Zhu, Tong, Prisciandaro, Joann I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5460
_version_ 1783279709491036160
author Owrangi, Amir M.
Jolly, Shruti
Balter, James M.
Cao, Yue
Maturen, Katherine E.
Young, Lisa
Zhu, Tong
Prisciandaro, Joann I.
author_facet Owrangi, Amir M.
Jolly, Shruti
Balter, James M.
Cao, Yue
Maturen, Katherine E.
Young, Lisa
Zhu, Tong
Prisciandaro, Joann I.
author_sort Owrangi, Amir M.
collection PubMed
description We present an institutional experience on the clinical implementation of magnetic resonance (MR)‐guided vaginal brachytherapy using commercially available solid applicator models. To test the fidelity of solid applicator models to digitize vaginal cylinder applicators, three datasets were evaluated. The first included 15 patients who were simulated with CT alone. Next, a water phantom was used to evaluate vaginal cylinders ranging from 20 to 35 mm in diameter with CT and MR. Finally, three patients undergoing HDR brachytherapy with vaginal cylinders that were simulated with both CT and MR were evaluated. In these assessments, the solid applicator models were aligned based on the outline of the applicators on the corresponding volumetric image, and deviations between the central source positions defined based on X‐ray markers (on CT) and solid applicator models (on CT and MR), and the percent dose difference between select reference points were calculated. The mean central source deviation defined based on X‐ray markers (on CT) and solid applicator models (on CT and MR) for the 15‐patient cohort, the phantom, and the 3‐patient cohort is 0.6 mm, 0.6 mm, and 1.2 mm, respectively. The average absolute percent dose difference for the bladder, rectum, prescription, and inferior reference points were 2.2%, 2.3%, 2.2%, and 2.4%, respectively, for the 15 patient cohort. For the phantom study, the average, absolute percent dose difference for the prescription and inferior reference points are 2.0% and 2.1% for the CT, 2.3% and 2.2% for the T1W, and 2.8% and 3.0% for the T2W images. For the three patient cohort, the average absolute percent dose difference for the bladder, rectum, prescription, and inferior reference points are 2.9%, 2.6%, 3.0%, and 4.2% for the CT, 6.5%, 1.6%, 2.5%, and 4.7% for the T1W, and 6.0%, 7.4%, 2.6, and 2.0% for the T2W images. Based on the current study, aligning the applicator model to MR images provides a practical, efficient approach to perform MR‐based brachytherapy planning. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.61.Tg
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5691024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56910242018-03-12 Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy Owrangi, Amir M. Jolly, Shruti Balter, James M. Cao, Yue Maturen, Katherine E. Young, Lisa Zhu, Tong Prisciandaro, Joann I. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes We present an institutional experience on the clinical implementation of magnetic resonance (MR)‐guided vaginal brachytherapy using commercially available solid applicator models. To test the fidelity of solid applicator models to digitize vaginal cylinder applicators, three datasets were evaluated. The first included 15 patients who were simulated with CT alone. Next, a water phantom was used to evaluate vaginal cylinders ranging from 20 to 35 mm in diameter with CT and MR. Finally, three patients undergoing HDR brachytherapy with vaginal cylinders that were simulated with both CT and MR were evaluated. In these assessments, the solid applicator models were aligned based on the outline of the applicators on the corresponding volumetric image, and deviations between the central source positions defined based on X‐ray markers (on CT) and solid applicator models (on CT and MR), and the percent dose difference between select reference points were calculated. The mean central source deviation defined based on X‐ray markers (on CT) and solid applicator models (on CT and MR) for the 15‐patient cohort, the phantom, and the 3‐patient cohort is 0.6 mm, 0.6 mm, and 1.2 mm, respectively. The average absolute percent dose difference for the bladder, rectum, prescription, and inferior reference points were 2.2%, 2.3%, 2.2%, and 2.4%, respectively, for the 15 patient cohort. For the phantom study, the average, absolute percent dose difference for the prescription and inferior reference points are 2.0% and 2.1% for the CT, 2.3% and 2.2% for the T1W, and 2.8% and 3.0% for the T2W images. For the three patient cohort, the average absolute percent dose difference for the bladder, rectum, prescription, and inferior reference points are 2.9%, 2.6%, 3.0%, and 4.2% for the CT, 6.5%, 1.6%, 2.5%, and 4.7% for the T1W, and 6.0%, 7.4%, 2.6, and 2.0% for the T2W images. Based on the current study, aligning the applicator model to MR images provides a practical, efficient approach to perform MR‐based brachytherapy planning. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.61.Tg John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5691024/ /pubmed/26699556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5460 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Owrangi, Amir M.
Jolly, Shruti
Balter, James M.
Cao, Yue
Maturen, Katherine E.
Young, Lisa
Zhu, Tong
Prisciandaro, Joann I.
Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy
title Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy
title_full Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy
title_fullStr Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy
title_short Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy
title_sort clinical implementation of mr‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5460
work_keys_str_mv AT owrangiamirm clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy
AT jollyshruti clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy
AT balterjamesm clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy
AT caoyue clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy
AT maturenkatherinee clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy
AT younglisa clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy
AT zhutong clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy
AT prisciandarojoanni clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy