Cargando…
Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy
We present an institutional experience on the clinical implementation of magnetic resonance (MR)‐guided vaginal brachytherapy using commercially available solid applicator models. To test the fidelity of solid applicator models to digitize vaginal cylinder applicators, three datasets were evaluated....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5460 |
_version_ | 1783279709491036160 |
---|---|
author | Owrangi, Amir M. Jolly, Shruti Balter, James M. Cao, Yue Maturen, Katherine E. Young, Lisa Zhu, Tong Prisciandaro, Joann I. |
author_facet | Owrangi, Amir M. Jolly, Shruti Balter, James M. Cao, Yue Maturen, Katherine E. Young, Lisa Zhu, Tong Prisciandaro, Joann I. |
author_sort | Owrangi, Amir M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present an institutional experience on the clinical implementation of magnetic resonance (MR)‐guided vaginal brachytherapy using commercially available solid applicator models. To test the fidelity of solid applicator models to digitize vaginal cylinder applicators, three datasets were evaluated. The first included 15 patients who were simulated with CT alone. Next, a water phantom was used to evaluate vaginal cylinders ranging from 20 to 35 mm in diameter with CT and MR. Finally, three patients undergoing HDR brachytherapy with vaginal cylinders that were simulated with both CT and MR were evaluated. In these assessments, the solid applicator models were aligned based on the outline of the applicators on the corresponding volumetric image, and deviations between the central source positions defined based on X‐ray markers (on CT) and solid applicator models (on CT and MR), and the percent dose difference between select reference points were calculated. The mean central source deviation defined based on X‐ray markers (on CT) and solid applicator models (on CT and MR) for the 15‐patient cohort, the phantom, and the 3‐patient cohort is 0.6 mm, 0.6 mm, and 1.2 mm, respectively. The average absolute percent dose difference for the bladder, rectum, prescription, and inferior reference points were 2.2%, 2.3%, 2.2%, and 2.4%, respectively, for the 15 patient cohort. For the phantom study, the average, absolute percent dose difference for the prescription and inferior reference points are 2.0% and 2.1% for the CT, 2.3% and 2.2% for the T1W, and 2.8% and 3.0% for the T2W images. For the three patient cohort, the average absolute percent dose difference for the bladder, rectum, prescription, and inferior reference points are 2.9%, 2.6%, 3.0%, and 4.2% for the CT, 6.5%, 1.6%, 2.5%, and 4.7% for the T1W, and 6.0%, 7.4%, 2.6, and 2.0% for the T2W images. Based on the current study, aligning the applicator model to MR images provides a practical, efficient approach to perform MR‐based brachytherapy planning. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.61.Tg |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5691024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56910242018-03-12 Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy Owrangi, Amir M. Jolly, Shruti Balter, James M. Cao, Yue Maturen, Katherine E. Young, Lisa Zhu, Tong Prisciandaro, Joann I. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes We present an institutional experience on the clinical implementation of magnetic resonance (MR)‐guided vaginal brachytherapy using commercially available solid applicator models. To test the fidelity of solid applicator models to digitize vaginal cylinder applicators, three datasets were evaluated. The first included 15 patients who were simulated with CT alone. Next, a water phantom was used to evaluate vaginal cylinders ranging from 20 to 35 mm in diameter with CT and MR. Finally, three patients undergoing HDR brachytherapy with vaginal cylinders that were simulated with both CT and MR were evaluated. In these assessments, the solid applicator models were aligned based on the outline of the applicators on the corresponding volumetric image, and deviations between the central source positions defined based on X‐ray markers (on CT) and solid applicator models (on CT and MR), and the percent dose difference between select reference points were calculated. The mean central source deviation defined based on X‐ray markers (on CT) and solid applicator models (on CT and MR) for the 15‐patient cohort, the phantom, and the 3‐patient cohort is 0.6 mm, 0.6 mm, and 1.2 mm, respectively. The average absolute percent dose difference for the bladder, rectum, prescription, and inferior reference points were 2.2%, 2.3%, 2.2%, and 2.4%, respectively, for the 15 patient cohort. For the phantom study, the average, absolute percent dose difference for the prescription and inferior reference points are 2.0% and 2.1% for the CT, 2.3% and 2.2% for the T1W, and 2.8% and 3.0% for the T2W images. For the three patient cohort, the average absolute percent dose difference for the bladder, rectum, prescription, and inferior reference points are 2.9%, 2.6%, 3.0%, and 4.2% for the CT, 6.5%, 1.6%, 2.5%, and 4.7% for the T1W, and 6.0%, 7.4%, 2.6, and 2.0% for the T2W images. Based on the current study, aligning the applicator model to MR images provides a practical, efficient approach to perform MR‐based brachytherapy planning. PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw, 87.61.Tg John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5691024/ /pubmed/26699556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5460 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Owrangi, Amir M. Jolly, Shruti Balter, James M. Cao, Yue Maturen, Katherine E. Young, Lisa Zhu, Tong Prisciandaro, Joann I. Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy |
title | Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy |
title_full | Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy |
title_fullStr | Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy |
title_short | Clinical implementation of MR‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy |
title_sort | clinical implementation of mr‐guided vaginal cylinder brachytherapy |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5460 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT owrangiamirm clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy AT jollyshruti clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy AT balterjamesm clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy AT caoyue clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy AT maturenkatherinee clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy AT younglisa clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy AT zhutong clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy AT prisciandarojoanni clinicalimplementationofmrguidedvaginalcylinderbrachytherapy |