Cargando…
Constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units
Constancy checks of a well‐type ionization chamber should be performed regularly as part of a quality assurance regime. The goal of this work was to test the feasibility of using a linear accelerator and an orthovoltage unit to check the constancy of a well‐type chamber's response to an externa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5608 |
_version_ | 1783279709960798208 |
---|---|
author | Hackett, Sara L. Davis, Benjamin Nixon, Andrew Wyatt, Ruth |
author_facet | Hackett, Sara L. Davis, Benjamin Nixon, Andrew Wyatt, Ruth |
author_sort | Hackett, Sara L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Constancy checks of a well‐type ionization chamber should be performed regularly as part of a quality assurance regime. The goal of this work was to test the feasibility of using a linear accelerator and an orthovoltage unit to check the constancy of a well‐type chamber's response to an external radiation source. The reproducibility, linearity with dose, variation with dose‐rate, and variation between energy‐matched units of the well‐type chamber response when exposed to 6 MV beams was examined. The robustness to errors in establishing the measurement conditions, including setting the source‐to‐surface distance and gantry angle, rotation of the chamber around the central axis of the beam, and the effect of changing the length of the chamber cable exposed to the field, were tested. The reproducibility and linearity with dose of the chamber response, and robustness to errors in establishing the measurement conditions for 100 kVp and 250 kVp beams from an orthovoltage unit, were also examined. The combined uncertainty, including contributions from errors in establishing the reference conditions, for well‐type chamber measurements using a 6 MV beam from a linear accelerator is 1.0%. The combined uncertainties for measurements using 100 and 250 kVp beams were 1.8% and 1.5%, respectively. When focus‐source distance errors were reduced to [Formula: see text] , the combined uncertainties for the 100 and 250 kVp beams were 1.2% and 1.1%, respectively, when the dose to the chamber was confined to the linear region of the dose‐response curve. The response of a well‐type chamber should remain constant to within 1.2% when exposed to a constant dose from an external beam unit, if reference conditions can be reproducibly established. However, the uncertainty for establishing reference conditions for output measurements for an orthovoltage unit can be reduced, which would justify a reduction of the tolerance for constancy measurements. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5691027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56910272018-04-02 Constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units Hackett, Sara L. Davis, Benjamin Nixon, Andrew Wyatt, Ruth J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Constancy checks of a well‐type ionization chamber should be performed regularly as part of a quality assurance regime. The goal of this work was to test the feasibility of using a linear accelerator and an orthovoltage unit to check the constancy of a well‐type chamber's response to an external radiation source. The reproducibility, linearity with dose, variation with dose‐rate, and variation between energy‐matched units of the well‐type chamber response when exposed to 6 MV beams was examined. The robustness to errors in establishing the measurement conditions, including setting the source‐to‐surface distance and gantry angle, rotation of the chamber around the central axis of the beam, and the effect of changing the length of the chamber cable exposed to the field, were tested. The reproducibility and linearity with dose of the chamber response, and robustness to errors in establishing the measurement conditions for 100 kVp and 250 kVp beams from an orthovoltage unit, were also examined. The combined uncertainty, including contributions from errors in establishing the reference conditions, for well‐type chamber measurements using a 6 MV beam from a linear accelerator is 1.0%. The combined uncertainties for measurements using 100 and 250 kVp beams were 1.8% and 1.5%, respectively. When focus‐source distance errors were reduced to [Formula: see text] , the combined uncertainties for the 100 and 250 kVp beams were 1.2% and 1.1%, respectively, when the dose to the chamber was confined to the linear region of the dose‐response curve. The response of a well‐type chamber should remain constant to within 1.2% when exposed to a constant dose from an external beam unit, if reference conditions can be reproducibly established. However, the uncertainty for establishing reference conditions for output measurements for an orthovoltage unit can be reduced, which would justify a reduction of the tolerance for constancy measurements. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5691027/ /pubmed/26699571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5608 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Hackett, Sara L. Davis, Benjamin Nixon, Andrew Wyatt, Ruth Constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units |
title | Constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units |
title_full | Constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units |
title_fullStr | Constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units |
title_full_unstemmed | Constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units |
title_short | Constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units |
title_sort | constancy checks of well‐type ionization chambers with external‐beam radiation units |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hackettsaral constancychecksofwelltypeionizationchamberswithexternalbeamradiationunits AT davisbenjamin constancychecksofwelltypeionizationchamberswithexternalbeamradiationunits AT nixonandrew constancychecksofwelltypeionizationchamberswithexternalbeamradiationunits AT wyattruth constancychecksofwelltypeionizationchamberswithexternalbeamradiationunits |