Cargando…

Utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative anaphylactic reactions due to drugs and substances associated with general anesthesia can potentially be life‐threatening. The objective of this study was to investigate the significance of the basophil activation test (BAT) for allergy diagnosis work up. METHODS: A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eberlein, Bernadette, Wigand, Sibylle, Lewald, Heidrun, Kochs, Eberhard, Ring, Johannes, Biedermann, Tilo, Darsow, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28580612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.175
_version_ 1783279769079513088
author Eberlein, Bernadette
Wigand, Sibylle
Lewald, Heidrun
Kochs, Eberhard
Ring, Johannes
Biedermann, Tilo
Darsow, Ulf
author_facet Eberlein, Bernadette
Wigand, Sibylle
Lewald, Heidrun
Kochs, Eberhard
Ring, Johannes
Biedermann, Tilo
Darsow, Ulf
author_sort Eberlein, Bernadette
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Perioperative anaphylactic reactions due to drugs and substances associated with general anesthesia can potentially be life‐threatening. The objective of this study was to investigate the significance of the basophil activation test (BAT) for allergy diagnosis work up. METHODS: A total of 14 patients (5 men, 9 women; mean age: 57.8 years) with clinical records of anaphylactic reactions under general anesthesia were studied by means of anesthesia records, skin and serological tests. Eleven healthy subjects without any history of allergic sensitization to anaesthetic drugs served as controls. BATs based on stimulation of whole blood cells measuring CD63 activation of basophils and using CCR3 as basophil marker by flow cytometry (Flow CAST®, BÜHLMANN Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland) were performed with the following substances (in dependence on the history and the skin tests of the patient): analgesics (acetylsalicylic acid, celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, indometacin, metamizole, paracetamol, propyphenazone, tramadol), antibiotics (PPL (benzylpenicilloyl polylysine), MDM (minor determinant mixture), amoxicillin, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, roxithromycin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim), local anesthetics (articaine, bupivacaine, lidocaine, prilocaine, procaine, methyl‐4‐hydroxybenzoate), narcotics and NMBA (atracurium, cisatracurium, etomidate, neostigmine, midazolam, mivacurium, pancuronium, propofol, pyridostigmine, succinylcholine, sufentanil, thiopental, vecuronium), and other individual substances. RESULTS: Three patients showed positive results in the BAT: One to metamizole, one to PPL, and one to pancuronium. BATs with these substances were negative in controls. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT should be used complementary to skin tests, especially if IgE‐mediated mechanisms are presumed and skin tests are inconclusive. A positive reaction in BAT identifies the culprit agent with high probability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5691303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56913032017-11-24 Utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice Eberlein, Bernadette Wigand, Sibylle Lewald, Heidrun Kochs, Eberhard Ring, Johannes Biedermann, Tilo Darsow, Ulf Immun Inflamm Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Perioperative anaphylactic reactions due to drugs and substances associated with general anesthesia can potentially be life‐threatening. The objective of this study was to investigate the significance of the basophil activation test (BAT) for allergy diagnosis work up. METHODS: A total of 14 patients (5 men, 9 women; mean age: 57.8 years) with clinical records of anaphylactic reactions under general anesthesia were studied by means of anesthesia records, skin and serological tests. Eleven healthy subjects without any history of allergic sensitization to anaesthetic drugs served as controls. BATs based on stimulation of whole blood cells measuring CD63 activation of basophils and using CCR3 as basophil marker by flow cytometry (Flow CAST®, BÜHLMANN Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland) were performed with the following substances (in dependence on the history and the skin tests of the patient): analgesics (acetylsalicylic acid, celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, indometacin, metamizole, paracetamol, propyphenazone, tramadol), antibiotics (PPL (benzylpenicilloyl polylysine), MDM (minor determinant mixture), amoxicillin, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, roxithromycin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim), local anesthetics (articaine, bupivacaine, lidocaine, prilocaine, procaine, methyl‐4‐hydroxybenzoate), narcotics and NMBA (atracurium, cisatracurium, etomidate, neostigmine, midazolam, mivacurium, pancuronium, propofol, pyridostigmine, succinylcholine, sufentanil, thiopental, vecuronium), and other individual substances. RESULTS: Three patients showed positive results in the BAT: One to metamizole, one to PPL, and one to pancuronium. BATs with these substances were negative in controls. CONCLUSIONS: The BAT should be used complementary to skin tests, especially if IgE‐mediated mechanisms are presumed and skin tests are inconclusive. A positive reaction in BAT identifies the culprit agent with high probability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5691303/ /pubmed/28580612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.175 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Eberlein, Bernadette
Wigand, Sibylle
Lewald, Heidrun
Kochs, Eberhard
Ring, Johannes
Biedermann, Tilo
Darsow, Ulf
Utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice
title Utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice
title_full Utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice
title_fullStr Utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice
title_full_unstemmed Utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice
title_short Utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice
title_sort utility of basophil activation testing to assess perioperative anaphylactic reactions in real‐world practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28580612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.175
work_keys_str_mv AT eberleinbernadette utilityofbasophilactivationtestingtoassessperioperativeanaphylacticreactionsinrealworldpractice
AT wigandsibylle utilityofbasophilactivationtestingtoassessperioperativeanaphylacticreactionsinrealworldpractice
AT lewaldheidrun utilityofbasophilactivationtestingtoassessperioperativeanaphylacticreactionsinrealworldpractice
AT kochseberhard utilityofbasophilactivationtestingtoassessperioperativeanaphylacticreactionsinrealworldpractice
AT ringjohannes utilityofbasophilactivationtestingtoassessperioperativeanaphylacticreactionsinrealworldpractice
AT biedermanntilo utilityofbasophilactivationtestingtoassessperioperativeanaphylacticreactionsinrealworldpractice
AT darsowulf utilityofbasophilactivationtestingtoassessperioperativeanaphylacticreactionsinrealworldpractice