Cargando…
Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016
Major advances have been made in the treatment of cancer with targeted therapy and immunotherapy; several FDA-approved agents with associated improvement of 1-year survival rates became available for stage IV melanoma patients. Before 2010, the 1-year survival were quite low, at 30%; in 2011, the ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1341-2 |
_version_ | 1783279879299530752 |
---|---|
author | Ascierto, Paolo A. Agarwala, Sanjiv S. Ciliberto, Gennaro Demaria, Sandra Dummer, Reinhard Duong, Connie P. M. Ferrone, Soldano Formenti, Silvia C. Garbe, Claus Halaban, Ruth Khleif, Samir Luke, Jason J. Mir, Lluis M. Overwijk, Willem W. Postow, Michael Puzanov, Igor Sondel, Paul Taube, Janis M. Thor Straten, Per Stroncek, David F. Wargo, Jennifer A. Zarour, Hassane Thurin, Magdalena |
author_facet | Ascierto, Paolo A. Agarwala, Sanjiv S. Ciliberto, Gennaro Demaria, Sandra Dummer, Reinhard Duong, Connie P. M. Ferrone, Soldano Formenti, Silvia C. Garbe, Claus Halaban, Ruth Khleif, Samir Luke, Jason J. Mir, Lluis M. Overwijk, Willem W. Postow, Michael Puzanov, Igor Sondel, Paul Taube, Janis M. Thor Straten, Per Stroncek, David F. Wargo, Jennifer A. Zarour, Hassane Thurin, Magdalena |
author_sort | Ascierto, Paolo A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Major advances have been made in the treatment of cancer with targeted therapy and immunotherapy; several FDA-approved agents with associated improvement of 1-year survival rates became available for stage IV melanoma patients. Before 2010, the 1-year survival were quite low, at 30%; in 2011, the rise to nearly 50% in the setting of treatment with Ipilimumab, and rise to 70% with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in 2013 was observed. Even more impressive are 1-year survival rates considering combination strategies with both targeted therapy and immunotherapy, now exceeding 80%. Can we improve response rates even further, and bring these therapies to more patients? In fact, despite these advances, responses are heterogeneous and are not always durable. There is a critical need to better understand who will benefit from therapy, as well as proper timing, sequence and combination of different therapeutic agents. How can we better understand responses to therapy and optimize treatment regimens? The key to better understanding therapy and to optimizing responses is with insights gained from responses to targeted therapy and immunotherapy through translational research in human samples. Combination therapies including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, electrochemotherapy with immunotherapy agents such as Immune Checkpoint Blockers are under investigation but there is much room for improvement. Adoptive T cell therapy including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells therapy is also efficacious in metastatic melanoma and outcome enhancement seem likely by improved homing capacity of chemokine receptor transduced T cells. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes therapy is also efficacious in metastatic melanoma and outcome enhancement seem likely by improved homing capacity of chemokine receptor transduced T cells. Understanding the mechanisms behind the development of acquired resistance and tests for biomarkers for treatment decisions are also under study and will offer new opportunities for more efficient combination therapies. Knowledge of immunologic features of the tumor microenvironment associated with response and resistance will improve the identification of patients who will derive the most benefit from monotherapy and might reveal additional immunologic determinants that could be targeted in combination with checkpoint blockade. The future of advanced melanoma needs to involve education and trials, biobanks with a focus on primary tumors, bioinformatics and empowerment of patients and clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5691855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56918552017-11-24 Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016 Ascierto, Paolo A. Agarwala, Sanjiv S. Ciliberto, Gennaro Demaria, Sandra Dummer, Reinhard Duong, Connie P. M. Ferrone, Soldano Formenti, Silvia C. Garbe, Claus Halaban, Ruth Khleif, Samir Luke, Jason J. Mir, Lluis M. Overwijk, Willem W. Postow, Michael Puzanov, Igor Sondel, Paul Taube, Janis M. Thor Straten, Per Stroncek, David F. Wargo, Jennifer A. Zarour, Hassane Thurin, Magdalena J Transl Med Meeting Report Major advances have been made in the treatment of cancer with targeted therapy and immunotherapy; several FDA-approved agents with associated improvement of 1-year survival rates became available for stage IV melanoma patients. Before 2010, the 1-year survival were quite low, at 30%; in 2011, the rise to nearly 50% in the setting of treatment with Ipilimumab, and rise to 70% with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in 2013 was observed. Even more impressive are 1-year survival rates considering combination strategies with both targeted therapy and immunotherapy, now exceeding 80%. Can we improve response rates even further, and bring these therapies to more patients? In fact, despite these advances, responses are heterogeneous and are not always durable. There is a critical need to better understand who will benefit from therapy, as well as proper timing, sequence and combination of different therapeutic agents. How can we better understand responses to therapy and optimize treatment regimens? The key to better understanding therapy and to optimizing responses is with insights gained from responses to targeted therapy and immunotherapy through translational research in human samples. Combination therapies including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, electrochemotherapy with immunotherapy agents such as Immune Checkpoint Blockers are under investigation but there is much room for improvement. Adoptive T cell therapy including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells therapy is also efficacious in metastatic melanoma and outcome enhancement seem likely by improved homing capacity of chemokine receptor transduced T cells. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes therapy is also efficacious in metastatic melanoma and outcome enhancement seem likely by improved homing capacity of chemokine receptor transduced T cells. Understanding the mechanisms behind the development of acquired resistance and tests for biomarkers for treatment decisions are also under study and will offer new opportunities for more efficient combination therapies. Knowledge of immunologic features of the tumor microenvironment associated with response and resistance will improve the identification of patients who will derive the most benefit from monotherapy and might reveal additional immunologic determinants that could be targeted in combination with checkpoint blockade. The future of advanced melanoma needs to involve education and trials, biobanks with a focus on primary tumors, bioinformatics and empowerment of patients and clinicians. BioMed Central 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5691855/ /pubmed/29145885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1341-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Meeting Report Ascierto, Paolo A. Agarwala, Sanjiv S. Ciliberto, Gennaro Demaria, Sandra Dummer, Reinhard Duong, Connie P. M. Ferrone, Soldano Formenti, Silvia C. Garbe, Claus Halaban, Ruth Khleif, Samir Luke, Jason J. Mir, Lluis M. Overwijk, Willem W. Postow, Michael Puzanov, Igor Sondel, Paul Taube, Janis M. Thor Straten, Per Stroncek, David F. Wargo, Jennifer A. Zarour, Hassane Thurin, Magdalena Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016 |
title | Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016 |
title_full | Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016 |
title_fullStr | Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016 |
title_short | Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016 |
title_sort | future perspectives in melanoma research “melanoma bridge”, napoli, november 30th–3rd december 2016 |
topic | Meeting Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5691855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1341-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asciertopaoloa futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT agarwalasanjivs futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT cilibertogennaro futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT demariasandra futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT dummerreinhard futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT duongconniepm futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT ferronesoldano futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT formentisilviac futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT garbeclaus futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT halabanruth futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT khleifsamir futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT lukejasonj futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT mirlluism futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT overwijkwillemw futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT postowmichael futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT puzanovigor futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT sondelpaul futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT taubejanism futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT thorstratenper futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT stroncekdavidf futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT wargojennifera futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT zarourhassane futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 AT thurinmagdalena futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016 |