Cargando…

The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy

Transfer entropy (TE) provides a generalized and model-free framework to study Wiener-Granger causality between brain regions. Because of its nonparametric character, TE can infer directed information flow also from nonlinear systems. Despite its increasing number of applications in neuroscience, no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Immo, Florin, Esther, von Papen, Michael, Timmermann, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188210
_version_ 1783279922895126528
author Weber, Immo
Florin, Esther
von Papen, Michael
Timmermann, Lars
author_facet Weber, Immo
Florin, Esther
von Papen, Michael
Timmermann, Lars
author_sort Weber, Immo
collection PubMed
description Transfer entropy (TE) provides a generalized and model-free framework to study Wiener-Granger causality between brain regions. Because of its nonparametric character, TE can infer directed information flow also from nonlinear systems. Despite its increasing number of applications in neuroscience, not much is known regarding the influence of common electrophysiological preprocessing on its estimation. We test the influence of filtering and downsampling on a recently proposed nearest neighborhood based TE estimator. Different filter settings and downsampling factors were tested in a simulation framework using a model with a linear coupling function and two nonlinear models with sigmoid and logistic coupling functions. For nonlinear coupling and progressively lower low-pass filter cut-off frequencies up to 72% false negative direct connections and up to 26% false positive connections were identified. In contrast, for the linear model, a monotonic increase was only observed for missed indirect connections (up to 86%). High-pass filtering (1 Hz, 2 Hz) had no impact on TE estimation. After low-pass filtering interaction delays were significantly underestimated. Downsampling the data by a factor greater than the assumed interaction delay erased most of the transmitted information and thus led to a very high percentage (67–100%) of false negative direct connections. Low-pass filtering increases the number of missed connections depending on the filters cut-off frequency. Downsampling should only be done if the sampling factor is smaller than the smallest assumed interaction delay of the analyzed network.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5693301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56933012017-11-30 The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy Weber, Immo Florin, Esther von Papen, Michael Timmermann, Lars PLoS One Research Article Transfer entropy (TE) provides a generalized and model-free framework to study Wiener-Granger causality between brain regions. Because of its nonparametric character, TE can infer directed information flow also from nonlinear systems. Despite its increasing number of applications in neuroscience, not much is known regarding the influence of common electrophysiological preprocessing on its estimation. We test the influence of filtering and downsampling on a recently proposed nearest neighborhood based TE estimator. Different filter settings and downsampling factors were tested in a simulation framework using a model with a linear coupling function and two nonlinear models with sigmoid and logistic coupling functions. For nonlinear coupling and progressively lower low-pass filter cut-off frequencies up to 72% false negative direct connections and up to 26% false positive connections were identified. In contrast, for the linear model, a monotonic increase was only observed for missed indirect connections (up to 86%). High-pass filtering (1 Hz, 2 Hz) had no impact on TE estimation. After low-pass filtering interaction delays were significantly underestimated. Downsampling the data by a factor greater than the assumed interaction delay erased most of the transmitted information and thus led to a very high percentage (67–100%) of false negative direct connections. Low-pass filtering increases the number of missed connections depending on the filters cut-off frequency. Downsampling should only be done if the sampling factor is smaller than the smallest assumed interaction delay of the analyzed network. Public Library of Science 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5693301/ /pubmed/29149201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188210 Text en © 2017 Weber et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weber, Immo
Florin, Esther
von Papen, Michael
Timmermann, Lars
The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy
title The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy
title_full The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy
title_fullStr The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy
title_full_unstemmed The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy
title_short The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy
title_sort influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188210
work_keys_str_mv AT weberimmo theinfluenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy
AT florinesther theinfluenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy
AT vonpapenmichael theinfluenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy
AT timmermannlars theinfluenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy
AT weberimmo influenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy
AT florinesther influenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy
AT vonpapenmichael influenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy
AT timmermannlars influenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy