Cargando…
The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy
Transfer entropy (TE) provides a generalized and model-free framework to study Wiener-Granger causality between brain regions. Because of its nonparametric character, TE can infer directed information flow also from nonlinear systems. Despite its increasing number of applications in neuroscience, no...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188210 |
_version_ | 1783279922895126528 |
---|---|
author | Weber, Immo Florin, Esther von Papen, Michael Timmermann, Lars |
author_facet | Weber, Immo Florin, Esther von Papen, Michael Timmermann, Lars |
author_sort | Weber, Immo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transfer entropy (TE) provides a generalized and model-free framework to study Wiener-Granger causality between brain regions. Because of its nonparametric character, TE can infer directed information flow also from nonlinear systems. Despite its increasing number of applications in neuroscience, not much is known regarding the influence of common electrophysiological preprocessing on its estimation. We test the influence of filtering and downsampling on a recently proposed nearest neighborhood based TE estimator. Different filter settings and downsampling factors were tested in a simulation framework using a model with a linear coupling function and two nonlinear models with sigmoid and logistic coupling functions. For nonlinear coupling and progressively lower low-pass filter cut-off frequencies up to 72% false negative direct connections and up to 26% false positive connections were identified. In contrast, for the linear model, a monotonic increase was only observed for missed indirect connections (up to 86%). High-pass filtering (1 Hz, 2 Hz) had no impact on TE estimation. After low-pass filtering interaction delays were significantly underestimated. Downsampling the data by a factor greater than the assumed interaction delay erased most of the transmitted information and thus led to a very high percentage (67–100%) of false negative direct connections. Low-pass filtering increases the number of missed connections depending on the filters cut-off frequency. Downsampling should only be done if the sampling factor is smaller than the smallest assumed interaction delay of the analyzed network. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5693301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56933012017-11-30 The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy Weber, Immo Florin, Esther von Papen, Michael Timmermann, Lars PLoS One Research Article Transfer entropy (TE) provides a generalized and model-free framework to study Wiener-Granger causality between brain regions. Because of its nonparametric character, TE can infer directed information flow also from nonlinear systems. Despite its increasing number of applications in neuroscience, not much is known regarding the influence of common electrophysiological preprocessing on its estimation. We test the influence of filtering and downsampling on a recently proposed nearest neighborhood based TE estimator. Different filter settings and downsampling factors were tested in a simulation framework using a model with a linear coupling function and two nonlinear models with sigmoid and logistic coupling functions. For nonlinear coupling and progressively lower low-pass filter cut-off frequencies up to 72% false negative direct connections and up to 26% false positive connections were identified. In contrast, for the linear model, a monotonic increase was only observed for missed indirect connections (up to 86%). High-pass filtering (1 Hz, 2 Hz) had no impact on TE estimation. After low-pass filtering interaction delays were significantly underestimated. Downsampling the data by a factor greater than the assumed interaction delay erased most of the transmitted information and thus led to a very high percentage (67–100%) of false negative direct connections. Low-pass filtering increases the number of missed connections depending on the filters cut-off frequency. Downsampling should only be done if the sampling factor is smaller than the smallest assumed interaction delay of the analyzed network. Public Library of Science 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5693301/ /pubmed/29149201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188210 Text en © 2017 Weber et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weber, Immo Florin, Esther von Papen, Michael Timmermann, Lars The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy |
title | The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy |
title_full | The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy |
title_fullStr | The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy |
title_short | The influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy |
title_sort | influence of filtering and downsampling on the estimation of transfer entropy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weberimmo theinfluenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy AT florinesther theinfluenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy AT vonpapenmichael theinfluenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy AT timmermannlars theinfluenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy AT weberimmo influenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy AT florinesther influenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy AT vonpapenmichael influenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy AT timmermannlars influenceoffilteringanddownsamplingontheestimationoftransferentropy |