Cargando…

Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Perinatal outcomes may be influenced by a variety of factors including maternal demographics and medical condition as well as socio-economic status. The evidence for disparities in health outcomes stratified by type of care (public or private) is lacking. The aim of this study was to inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Woonji, Flatley, Christopher, Greer, Ristan M., Kumar, Sailesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187040
_version_ 1783279939982721024
author Jang, Woonji
Flatley, Christopher
Greer, Ristan M.
Kumar, Sailesh
author_facet Jang, Woonji
Flatley, Christopher
Greer, Ristan M.
Kumar, Sailesh
author_sort Jang, Woonji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perinatal outcomes may be influenced by a variety of factors including maternal demographics and medical condition as well as socio-economic status. The evidence for disparities in health outcomes stratified by type of care (public or private) is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate short term neonatal outcomes following category 1 and 2 emergency cesareans at term between publicly and privately funded women at a single major tertiary centre in Australia. Category 1—immediate threat to life (maternal or fetal); Category 2—maternal or fetal compromise that is not immediately life-threatening. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross sectional study of 61355 term singleton babies born at the Mater Mother’s Hospital in Brisbane, Australia in 2007–2014. We collected data from the hospital’s maternity database and compared maternal demographics, indications for cesarean and neonatal outcomes for publicly and privately funded women. RESULTS: Over the study period there were 32477 public and 28878 private, term singleton births. Compared to the publicly funded cohort, privately insured women were older, had lower BMI, were of Caucasian ethnicity, Australian born, nulliparous, had shorter labors and had lower rates of hypertensive disorders and diabetes. The most common indications for category 1 and category 2 cesareans in combination were non-reassuring fetal status followed by failure to progress in labor and malpresentation. For both category 1 and 2 cesareans, neonatal outcomes (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, abnormal cord gases, Neonatal Critical Care Unit admission rates, rates of severe respiratory distress and jaundice) were significantly worse in the publicly funded compared to the privately insured cohort Multivariate analyses controlling for maternal age, ethnicity, country of birth, parity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, gestational age at birth and length of labour confirmed that private insurance status was highly protective for the perinatal outcomes of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.55), admission to NCCU (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30–0.92) and respiratory distress (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.86). CONCLUSION: Birth in the private health sector was inversely associated with adverse neonatal outcomes following category 1 and 2 cesareans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5693444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56934442017-11-30 Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study Jang, Woonji Flatley, Christopher Greer, Ristan M. Kumar, Sailesh PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Perinatal outcomes may be influenced by a variety of factors including maternal demographics and medical condition as well as socio-economic status. The evidence for disparities in health outcomes stratified by type of care (public or private) is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate short term neonatal outcomes following category 1 and 2 emergency cesareans at term between publicly and privately funded women at a single major tertiary centre in Australia. Category 1—immediate threat to life (maternal or fetal); Category 2—maternal or fetal compromise that is not immediately life-threatening. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross sectional study of 61355 term singleton babies born at the Mater Mother’s Hospital in Brisbane, Australia in 2007–2014. We collected data from the hospital’s maternity database and compared maternal demographics, indications for cesarean and neonatal outcomes for publicly and privately funded women. RESULTS: Over the study period there were 32477 public and 28878 private, term singleton births. Compared to the publicly funded cohort, privately insured women were older, had lower BMI, were of Caucasian ethnicity, Australian born, nulliparous, had shorter labors and had lower rates of hypertensive disorders and diabetes. The most common indications for category 1 and category 2 cesareans in combination were non-reassuring fetal status followed by failure to progress in labor and malpresentation. For both category 1 and 2 cesareans, neonatal outcomes (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, abnormal cord gases, Neonatal Critical Care Unit admission rates, rates of severe respiratory distress and jaundice) were significantly worse in the publicly funded compared to the privately insured cohort Multivariate analyses controlling for maternal age, ethnicity, country of birth, parity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, gestational age at birth and length of labour confirmed that private insurance status was highly protective for the perinatal outcomes of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.55), admission to NCCU (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30–0.92) and respiratory distress (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.86). CONCLUSION: Birth in the private health sector was inversely associated with adverse neonatal outcomes following category 1 and 2 cesareans. Public Library of Science 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5693444/ /pubmed/29149182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187040 Text en © 2017 Jang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jang, Woonji
Flatley, Christopher
Greer, Ristan M.
Kumar, Sailesh
Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study
title Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – A retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term – a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187040
work_keys_str_mv AT jangwoonji comparisonbetweenpublicandprivatesectorsofcareanddisparitiesinadverseneonataloutcomesfollowingemergencyintrapartumcesareanattermaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT flatleychristopher comparisonbetweenpublicandprivatesectorsofcareanddisparitiesinadverseneonataloutcomesfollowingemergencyintrapartumcesareanattermaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT greerristanm comparisonbetweenpublicandprivatesectorsofcareanddisparitiesinadverseneonataloutcomesfollowingemergencyintrapartumcesareanattermaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kumarsailesh comparisonbetweenpublicandprivatesectorsofcareanddisparitiesinadverseneonataloutcomesfollowingemergencyintrapartumcesareanattermaretrospectivecohortstudy