Cargando…

Management and outcomes of Gleason six prostate cancer detected on needle biopsy: A single-surgeon experience over 6 years

OBJECTIVE: To assess the management and oncological outcomes in men diagnosed with Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer on needle biopsy in a regional centre, as compared with published international data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who were diagnosed w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	March, Brayden, Koufogiannis, George, Louie-Johnsun, Mark
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2017
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29188200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2017.03.007

Ejemplares similares

Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists
por: Al-Maghrabi, Jaudah Ahmed, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Real-time diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate core needle biopsies using nonlinear microscopy
por: Cahill, Lucas C., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Significance of Nuclear Factor - Kappa Beta Activation on Prostate Needle Biopsy Samples in the Evaluation of Gleason Score 6 Prostatic Carcinoma Indolence
por: Zupancic, Marko, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6
por: Oh, Jong Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prostate cancer: Relationship between vascular diameter, shape and density and Gleason score in needle biopsy specimens
por: Tadayyon, Farhad, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

pT3 Predictive Factors in Patients with a Gleason Score of 6 in Prostate Biopsies
por: Kim, Sung Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy Enables Gleason Scoring of Prostate Core Needle Biopsy by a Convolutional Neural Network
por: Ao, Jianpeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Does magnetic resonance imaging–guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection? A comparison of systematic, cognitive fusion and ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
por: Kam, Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and/or prostate-specific antigen in discriminating real Gleason score ≥ 7 prostate cancer from group of biopsy-based Gleason score ≤ 6
por: Wang, Hanfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Erratum: pT3 Predictive Factors in Patients with a Gleason Score of 6 in Prostate Biopsies
Publicado: (2011)

Gleason 6 prostate cancer: That which cannot be named
por: Burke, Harry B.
Publicado: (2022)

Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: An Indian experience
por: Nayyar, Rishi, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies
por: Lucas, Marit, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Automated Gleason Scoring and Tumor Quantification in Prostate Core Needle Biopsy Images Using Deep Neural Networks and Its Comparison with Pathologist-Based Assessment
por: Ryu, Han Suk, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Role of AMACR, CD10, TMPRSS2-ERG, and p27 Protein Expression Among Different Gleason Grades of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy
por: Gülhan, Özdemir, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy
por: Moon, Seung Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Correlation between body mass index (BMI) and the Gleason score of prostate biopsies in Chinese population
por: Zhou, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer
por: Mori, Keiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Ability of Prostate Health Index (PHI) to Predict Gleason Score in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Discriminate Patients Between Gleason Score 6 and Gleason Score Higher Than 6—A Study on 320 Patients After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Dolejsova, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The correlation between the gleason score of the biopsy and that of the prostatectomy patch
por: Bai, W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with a Gleason score of 6 in transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy
por: Emekli, Emre, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Predictive Factors and Oncologic Outcome of Downgrade to Pathologic Gleason Score 6–7 after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 8–10
por: Chung, Doo Yong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer
por: Kayano, Paulo Priante, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Prostate Cancer in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Is Associated with Low Grade Gleason Score When Diagnosed on Biopsy
por: Jeon, Kyoung Pil, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Importance and determinants of Gleason score undergrading on biopsy sample of prostate cancer in a population-based study
por: Rapiti, Elisabetta, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens
por: Nagpal, Kunal, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Re: Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer
por: Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Biochemical Recurrence in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer in Korean Men: Significance of the Primary Gleason Grade
por: Ro, Yun Kwan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

miR-145-5p: A Potential Biomarker in Predicting Gleason Upgrading of Prostate Biopsy Samples Scored 3+3=6
por: Wang, Tao, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Gleason score and tumor laterality in radical prostatectomy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a comparative study
por: Pereira, Renan A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Investigating association of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy with Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy: A multi‐institutional analysis
por: Barsky, Andrew R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low‐risk prostate cancer on active surveillance
por: Tomer, Anirudh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The prevalence and risk factors of upgrading of Gleason grade group between transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
por: Promsen, Worapong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of First 1000 Consecutive Thyroid Nodules: Single-Surgeon Experience
por: Dhingra, Jagdish K.
Publicado: (2020)

Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system
por: Alqahtani, Saeed, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Importance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a predictive factor for concordance between the Gleason scores of prostate biopsies and RADICAL prostatectomy specimens
por: de Lima, Nelson Gianni, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Prostate-specific antigen 10–20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6
por: Santok, Glen Denmer R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The gut microbiota associated with high‐Gleason prostate cancer
por: Matsushita, Makoto, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_u4haibul1ahnp7b7n1bu71uk1q