Cargando…

Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Most people experience low back pain (LBP), and it is often ongoing or recurrent. Contemporary research knowledge indicates individual’s pain beliefs have a strong effect on their pain experience and management. This study’s primary aim was to determine the discourses (patterns of thinki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setchell, Jenny, Costa, Nathalia, Ferreira, Manuela, Makovey, Joanna, Nielsen, Mandy, Hodges, Paul W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1831-7
_version_ 1783279954636570624
author Setchell, Jenny
Costa, Nathalia
Ferreira, Manuela
Makovey, Joanna
Nielsen, Mandy
Hodges, Paul W.
author_facet Setchell, Jenny
Costa, Nathalia
Ferreira, Manuela
Makovey, Joanna
Nielsen, Mandy
Hodges, Paul W.
author_sort Setchell, Jenny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most people experience low back pain (LBP), and it is often ongoing or recurrent. Contemporary research knowledge indicates individual’s pain beliefs have a strong effect on their pain experience and management. This study’s primary aim was to determine the discourses (patterns of thinking) underlying people’s beliefs about what causes their LBP to persist. The secondary aim was to investigate what they believed was the source of this thinking. METHODS: We used a primarily qualitative survey design: 130 participants answered questions about what caused their LBP to persist, and where they learned about these causes. We analysed responses about what caused their LBP using discourse analysis (primary aim), and mixed methods involving content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse responses indicating where participants learnt these beliefs (secondary aim). RESULTS: We found that individuals discussed persistent LBP as 1) due to the body being like a ‘broken machine’, 2) permanent/immutable, 3) complex, and 4) very negative. Most participants indicated that they learnt these beliefs from health professionals (116, 89%). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that despite continuing attempts to shift pain beliefs to more complex biopsychosocial factors, most people with LBP adhere to the traditional biomedical perspective of anatomical/biomechanical causes. Relatedly, they often see their condition as very negative. Contrary to current “best practice” guidelines for LBP management, a potential consequence of such beliefs is an avoidance of physical activities, which is likely to result in increased morbidity. That health professionals may be the most pervasive source of this thinking is a cause for concern. A small number of people attributed non-physical, unknown or complex causes to their persistent LBP – indicating that other options are possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5693501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56935012017-11-24 Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey Setchell, Jenny Costa, Nathalia Ferreira, Manuela Makovey, Joanna Nielsen, Mandy Hodges, Paul W. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Most people experience low back pain (LBP), and it is often ongoing or recurrent. Contemporary research knowledge indicates individual’s pain beliefs have a strong effect on their pain experience and management. This study’s primary aim was to determine the discourses (patterns of thinking) underlying people’s beliefs about what causes their LBP to persist. The secondary aim was to investigate what they believed was the source of this thinking. METHODS: We used a primarily qualitative survey design: 130 participants answered questions about what caused their LBP to persist, and where they learned about these causes. We analysed responses about what caused their LBP using discourse analysis (primary aim), and mixed methods involving content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse responses indicating where participants learnt these beliefs (secondary aim). RESULTS: We found that individuals discussed persistent LBP as 1) due to the body being like a ‘broken machine’, 2) permanent/immutable, 3) complex, and 4) very negative. Most participants indicated that they learnt these beliefs from health professionals (116, 89%). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that despite continuing attempts to shift pain beliefs to more complex biopsychosocial factors, most people with LBP adhere to the traditional biomedical perspective of anatomical/biomechanical causes. Relatedly, they often see their condition as very negative. Contrary to current “best practice” guidelines for LBP management, a potential consequence of such beliefs is an avoidance of physical activities, which is likely to result in increased morbidity. That health professionals may be the most pervasive source of this thinking is a cause for concern. A small number of people attributed non-physical, unknown or complex causes to their persistent LBP – indicating that other options are possible. BioMed Central 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5693501/ /pubmed/29149847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1831-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Setchell, Jenny
Costa, Nathalia
Ferreira, Manuela
Makovey, Joanna
Nielsen, Mandy
Hodges, Paul W.
Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
title Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1831-7
work_keys_str_mv AT setchelljenny individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey
AT costanathalia individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey
AT ferreiramanuela individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey
AT makoveyjoanna individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey
AT nielsenmandy individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey
AT hodgespaulw individualsexplanationsfortheirpersistentorrecurrentlowbackpainacrosssectionalsurvey