Cargando…
Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
BACKGROUND: Root systems are highly plastic and adapt according to their soil environment. Studying the particular influence of soils on root development necessitates the adaptation and evaluation of imaging methods for multiple substrates. Non-invasive 3D root images in soil can be obtained using m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0252-9 |
_version_ | 1783279956413906944 |
---|---|
author | Pflugfelder, Daniel Metzner, Ralf van Dusschoten, Dagmar Reichel, Rüdiger Jahnke, Siegfried Koller, Robert |
author_facet | Pflugfelder, Daniel Metzner, Ralf van Dusschoten, Dagmar Reichel, Rüdiger Jahnke, Siegfried Koller, Robert |
author_sort | Pflugfelder, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Root systems are highly plastic and adapt according to their soil environment. Studying the particular influence of soils on root development necessitates the adaptation and evaluation of imaging methods for multiple substrates. Non-invasive 3D root images in soil can be obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Not all substrates, however, are suitable for MRI. Using barley as a model plant we investigated the achievable image quality and the suitability for root phenotyping of six commercially available natural soil substrates of commonly occurring soil textures. The results are compared with two artificially composed substrates previously documented for MRI root imaging. RESULTS: In five out of the eight tested substrates, barley lateral roots with diameters below 300 µm could still be resolved. In two other soils, only the thicker barley seminal roots were detectable. For these two substrates the minimal detectable root diameter was between 400 and 500 µm. Only one soil did not allow imaging of the roots with MRI. In the artificially composed substrates, soil moisture above 70% of the maximal water holding capacity (WHC(max)) impeded root imaging. For the natural soil substrates, soil moisture had no effect on MRI root image quality in the investigated range of 50–80% WHC(max). CONCLUSIONS: Almost all tested natural soil substrates allowed for root imaging using MRI. Half of these substrates resulted in root images comparable to our current lab standard substrate, allowing root detection down to a diameter of 300 µm. These soils were used as supplied by the vendor and, in particular, removal of ferromagnetic particles was not necessary. With the characterization of different soils, investigations such as trait stability across substrates are now possible using noninvasive MRI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-017-0252-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5693507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56935072017-11-24 Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Pflugfelder, Daniel Metzner, Ralf van Dusschoten, Dagmar Reichel, Rüdiger Jahnke, Siegfried Koller, Robert Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: Root systems are highly plastic and adapt according to their soil environment. Studying the particular influence of soils on root development necessitates the adaptation and evaluation of imaging methods for multiple substrates. Non-invasive 3D root images in soil can be obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Not all substrates, however, are suitable for MRI. Using barley as a model plant we investigated the achievable image quality and the suitability for root phenotyping of six commercially available natural soil substrates of commonly occurring soil textures. The results are compared with two artificially composed substrates previously documented for MRI root imaging. RESULTS: In five out of the eight tested substrates, barley lateral roots with diameters below 300 µm could still be resolved. In two other soils, only the thicker barley seminal roots were detectable. For these two substrates the minimal detectable root diameter was between 400 and 500 µm. Only one soil did not allow imaging of the roots with MRI. In the artificially composed substrates, soil moisture above 70% of the maximal water holding capacity (WHC(max)) impeded root imaging. For the natural soil substrates, soil moisture had no effect on MRI root image quality in the investigated range of 50–80% WHC(max). CONCLUSIONS: Almost all tested natural soil substrates allowed for root imaging using MRI. Half of these substrates resulted in root images comparable to our current lab standard substrate, allowing root detection down to a diameter of 300 µm. These soils were used as supplied by the vendor and, in particular, removal of ferromagnetic particles was not necessary. With the characterization of different soils, investigations such as trait stability across substrates are now possible using noninvasive MRI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13007-017-0252-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5693507/ /pubmed/29177002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0252-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Pflugfelder, Daniel Metzner, Ralf van Dusschoten, Dagmar Reichel, Rüdiger Jahnke, Siegfried Koller, Robert Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
title | Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
title_full | Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
title_short | Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
title_sort | non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (mri) |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0252-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pflugfelderdaniel noninvasiveimagingofplantrootsindifferentsoilsusingmagneticresonanceimagingmri AT metznerralf noninvasiveimagingofplantrootsindifferentsoilsusingmagneticresonanceimagingmri AT vandusschotendagmar noninvasiveimagingofplantrootsindifferentsoilsusingmagneticresonanceimagingmri AT reichelrudiger noninvasiveimagingofplantrootsindifferentsoilsusingmagneticresonanceimagingmri AT jahnkesiegfried noninvasiveimagingofplantrootsindifferentsoilsusingmagneticresonanceimagingmri AT kollerrobert noninvasiveimagingofplantrootsindifferentsoilsusingmagneticresonanceimagingmri |