Cargando…

Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a structured observational study

BACKGROUND: The quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) depends on the quality of information presented and the quality of team processes. Few studies have examined these factors using a standardized approach. The aim of this study was to objectively document the proces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hahlweg, Pola, Didi, Sarah, Kriston, Levente, Härter, Martin, Nestoriuc, Yvonne, Scholl, Isabelle
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2017
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3768-5

Ejemplares similares

A skills network approach to physicians’ competence in shared decision making
por: Kriston, Levente, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

How are decisions made in cancer care? A qualitative study using participant observation of current practice
por: Hahlweg, Pola, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Application of the skills network approach to measure physician competence in shared decision making based on self-assessment
por: Kriston, Levente, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correction: Application of the skills network approach to measure physician competence in shared decision making based on self-assessment
por: Kriston, Levente, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

In Absentia: An Exploratory Study of How Patients Are Considered in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings
por: Hahlweg, Pola, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study
por: Christalle, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
por: Scholl, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development and content validity of the Experienced Patient‐Centeredness Questionnaire (EPAT)—A best practice example for generating patient‐reported measures from qualitative data
por: Christalle, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
por: Scholl, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies—A systematic review
por: Doherr, Hanna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Shared Decision-Making in Oncology – A Qualitative Analysis of Healthcare Providers’ Views on Current Practice
por: Frerichs, Wiebke, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them — a scoping review
por: Scholl, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
por: Goto, Yuko, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care
por: Goto, Yuko, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessing the relevance and implementation of patient-centredness from the patients’ perspective in Germany: results of a Delphi study
por: Zeh, Stefan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Major influencing factors on routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: qualitative process evaluation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
por: Hahlweg, Pola, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Association between physicians’ and patients’ perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors
por: Goto, Yuko, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: impact of logistical challenges on communication and decision-making
por: Soukup, Tayana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Predicting the preferences for involvement in medical decision making among patients with mental disorders
por: Michaelis, Svea, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Analysis of communication styles underpinning clinical decision-making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings
por: Soukup, Tayana, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care
por: Hahlweg, Pola, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparative Safety of Pharmacologic Treatments for Persistent Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
por: Meister, Ramona, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessment of person-centeredness in healthcare and social support services for women with unintended pregnancy (CarePreg): protocol for a mixed-method study
por: Zill, Jördis M, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A multicentre cross‐sectional observational study of cancer multidisciplinary teams: Analysis of team decision making
por: Soukup, Tayana, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The anatomy of clinical decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer meetings: A cross-sectional observational study of teams in a natural context
por: Soukup, Tayana, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Implementation rate and effects of multidisciplinary team meetings on decision making about radiotherapy: an observational study at a single Japanese institution
por: Ichikawa, Mayumi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Do multidisciplinary cancer care teams suffer decision-making fatigue: an observational, longitudinal team improvement study
por: Soukup, Tayana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How shared is decision‐making in multidisciplinary tumour conferences with patient participation? An observational study
por: Schellenberger, Barbara, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Translation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Organisational Readiness for Implementing Change measure (ORIC): a cross-sectional study
por: Lindig, Anja, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Translation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the IcanSDM measure – a cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals
por: Lindig, Anja, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Patients’ Non-Medical Characteristics Contribute to Collective Medical Decision-Making at Multidisciplinary Oncological Team Meetings
por: Restivo, Léa, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Team dynamics and clinician’s experience influence decision-making during Upper-GI multidisciplinary team meetings: A multiple case study
por: Luijten, J.C.H.B.M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Multidisciplinary team functioning and decision making within forensic mental health
por: Haines, Alina, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The influence of multidisciplinary team meetings on treatment decisions in advanced bladder cancer
por: Walraven, Janneke E.W., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Analysing Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Patient Management: A Prospective Observational Evaluation of Team Clinical Decision-Making
por: Gandamihardja, T. A. K., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Multidisciplinary decision-making in mitral valve disease: the mitral valve heart team
por: Heuts, S., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: a qualitative study
por: Hamilton, D W, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The Oesophageal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team: Can Machine Learning Assist Decision-Making?
por: Thavanesan, Navamayooran, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Role of Telemedicine in Multidisciplinary Team Meetings
por: Aghdam, Mohammad Reza F., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Quality and process improvement of the multidisciplinary Heart Team meeting using Lean Six Sigma
por: Hoefsmit, Paulien C, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_o2voud9tn33ppt8fum1nd5dum5