Cargando…
A pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study
BACKGROUND: Preload studies are used to investigate the satiating effects of foods and food ingredients. However, the design of preload studies is complex, with many methodological considerations influencing appetite responses. The aim of this pilot investigation was to determine acceptability, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0208-x |
_version_ | 1783279967440732160 |
---|---|
author | Hobden, Mark R. Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia Commane, Daniel M. Rowland, Ian Gibson, Glenn R. Kennedy, Orla B. |
author_facet | Hobden, Mark R. Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia Commane, Daniel M. Rowland, Ian Gibson, Glenn R. Kennedy, Orla B. |
author_sort | Hobden, Mark R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preload studies are used to investigate the satiating effects of foods and food ingredients. However, the design of preload studies is complex, with many methodological considerations influencing appetite responses. The aim of this pilot investigation was to determine acceptability, and optimise methods, for a future satiety preload study. Specifically, we investigated the effects of altering (i) energy intake at a standardised breakfast (gender-specific or non-gender specific), and (ii) the duration between mid-morning preload and ad libitum lunch meal, on morning appetite scores and energy intake at lunch. METHODS: Participants attended a single study visit. Female participants consumed a 214-kcal breakfast (n = 10) or 266-kcal breakfast (n = 10), equivalent to 10% of recommended daily energy intakes for females and males, respectively. Male participants (n = 20) consumed a 266-kcal breakfast. All participants received a 250-ml orange juice preload 2 h after breakfast. The impact of different study timings was evaluated in male participants, with 10 males following one protocol (protocol 1) and 10 males following another (protocol 2). The duration between preload and ad libitum lunch meal was 2 h (protocol 1) or 2.5 h (protocol 2), with the ad libitum lunch meal provided at 12.00 or 13.00, respectively. All female participants followed protocol 2. Visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires were used to assess appetite responses and food/drink palatability. RESULTS: Correlation between male and female appetite scores was higher with the provision of a gender-specific breakfast, compared to non-gender-specific breakfast (Pearson correlation of 0.747 and 0.479, respectively). No differences in subjective appetite or ad libitum energy intake were found between protocols 1 and 2. VAS mean ratings of liking, enjoyment, and palatability were all > 66 out of 100 mm for breakfast, preload, and lunch meals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this pilot study confirm the acceptability of this methodology for future satiety preload studies. Appetite scores increased from preload to ad libitum lunch meal; however, no specific differences were found between protocols. The results highlight the importance of considering energy intake prior to preload provision, with a gender-specific breakfast improving the correlation between male and female appetite score responses to a morning preload. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5693544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56935442017-11-24 A pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study Hobden, Mark R. Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia Commane, Daniel M. Rowland, Ian Gibson, Glenn R. Kennedy, Orla B. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Preload studies are used to investigate the satiating effects of foods and food ingredients. However, the design of preload studies is complex, with many methodological considerations influencing appetite responses. The aim of this pilot investigation was to determine acceptability, and optimise methods, for a future satiety preload study. Specifically, we investigated the effects of altering (i) energy intake at a standardised breakfast (gender-specific or non-gender specific), and (ii) the duration between mid-morning preload and ad libitum lunch meal, on morning appetite scores and energy intake at lunch. METHODS: Participants attended a single study visit. Female participants consumed a 214-kcal breakfast (n = 10) or 266-kcal breakfast (n = 10), equivalent to 10% of recommended daily energy intakes for females and males, respectively. Male participants (n = 20) consumed a 266-kcal breakfast. All participants received a 250-ml orange juice preload 2 h after breakfast. The impact of different study timings was evaluated in male participants, with 10 males following one protocol (protocol 1) and 10 males following another (protocol 2). The duration between preload and ad libitum lunch meal was 2 h (protocol 1) or 2.5 h (protocol 2), with the ad libitum lunch meal provided at 12.00 or 13.00, respectively. All female participants followed protocol 2. Visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires were used to assess appetite responses and food/drink palatability. RESULTS: Correlation between male and female appetite scores was higher with the provision of a gender-specific breakfast, compared to non-gender-specific breakfast (Pearson correlation of 0.747 and 0.479, respectively). No differences in subjective appetite or ad libitum energy intake were found between protocols 1 and 2. VAS mean ratings of liking, enjoyment, and palatability were all > 66 out of 100 mm for breakfast, preload, and lunch meals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this pilot study confirm the acceptability of this methodology for future satiety preload studies. Appetite scores increased from preload to ad libitum lunch meal; however, no specific differences were found between protocols. The results highlight the importance of considering energy intake prior to preload provision, with a gender-specific breakfast improving the correlation between male and female appetite score responses to a morning preload. BioMed Central 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5693544/ /pubmed/29177071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0208-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hobden, Mark R. Guérin-Deremaux, Laetitia Commane, Daniel M. Rowland, Ian Gibson, Glenn R. Kennedy, Orla B. A pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study |
title | A pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study |
title_full | A pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study |
title_fullStr | A pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study |
title_short | A pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study |
title_sort | pilot investigation to optimise methods for a future satiety preload study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0208-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hobdenmarkr apilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT guerinderemauxlaetitia apilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT commanedanielm apilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT rowlandian apilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT gibsonglennr apilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT kennedyorlab apilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT hobdenmarkr pilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT guerinderemauxlaetitia pilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT commanedanielm pilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT rowlandian pilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT gibsonglennr pilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy AT kennedyorlab pilotinvestigationtooptimisemethodsforafuturesatietypreloadstudy |