Cargando…

Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment

BACKGROUND: As part of the preparations to establish a population-based biobank in a large Israeli health organization, we aimed to investigate through focus groups the knowledge, perceptions and attitudes of insured Israelis, toward biobanking, and then, after input from focus groups’ participants,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koren, Gideon, Beller, Daniella, Laifenfeld, Daphna, Grossman, Iris, Shalev, Varda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0223-8
_version_ 1783279970704949248
author Koren, Gideon
Beller, Daniella
Laifenfeld, Daphna
Grossman, Iris
Shalev, Varda
author_facet Koren, Gideon
Beller, Daniella
Laifenfeld, Daphna
Grossman, Iris
Shalev, Varda
author_sort Koren, Gideon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As part of the preparations to establish a population-based biobank in a large Israeli health organization, we aimed to investigate through focus groups the knowledge, perceptions and attitudes of insured Israelis, toward biobanking, and then, after input from focus groups’ participants, to empirically assess the impact of a revised recruitment process on recruitment rates. METHODS: 1. Six Focus group discussions were conducted (n = 10 per group) with individuals who had routine blood laboratory tests taken in the last 2 years. 2. After addressing the issues raised in the focus groups and revising the recruitment process, individuals undergoing routine blood tests in phlebotomy clinics (N = 10,262) were invited to participate in the future biobank. RESULTS: At the outset of the focus groups there was an overall positive response to the prospect of a population-based biobank. Concerns revolved around infringement on privacy, fears of the “big brother”(e.g. insurance companies), and anxiety about inequality. Reaction to the language of the informed consent document revolved around concerns over ability to maintain anonymity, to withdraw consent, involvement of commercial entities, and the general tenor of the informed consent, which was perceived as legalistic and unilateral. In general, the longer participants were exposed to discussion about the biobank, the less likely they were to consent to sign in. Overall, only 20% (12) of the 60 participants stated they would agree to sign in by the end of the 2 hour group session. The feedback obtained from the focus groups was used in the second stage (“real life”) of the study. A team of recruiters received extensive training to enable fruitful discussion and a detailed explanation to questions and concerns raised during the recruitment process. During the second stage of the study, after revising the consent form and training recruiters, a 53% consent rate was observed among 10,262 participants, more than 4 fold higher than estimated at the focus group stage. CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative focus group research helped identify important perceptions and concerns, which were subsequently addressed in the revised consent form and in the discussion the recruiters had with potential biobank donors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-017-0223-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5693555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56935552017-11-24 Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment Koren, Gideon Beller, Daniella Laifenfeld, Daphna Grossman, Iris Shalev, Varda BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: As part of the preparations to establish a population-based biobank in a large Israeli health organization, we aimed to investigate through focus groups the knowledge, perceptions and attitudes of insured Israelis, toward biobanking, and then, after input from focus groups’ participants, to empirically assess the impact of a revised recruitment process on recruitment rates. METHODS: 1. Six Focus group discussions were conducted (n = 10 per group) with individuals who had routine blood laboratory tests taken in the last 2 years. 2. After addressing the issues raised in the focus groups and revising the recruitment process, individuals undergoing routine blood tests in phlebotomy clinics (N = 10,262) were invited to participate in the future biobank. RESULTS: At the outset of the focus groups there was an overall positive response to the prospect of a population-based biobank. Concerns revolved around infringement on privacy, fears of the “big brother”(e.g. insurance companies), and anxiety about inequality. Reaction to the language of the informed consent document revolved around concerns over ability to maintain anonymity, to withdraw consent, involvement of commercial entities, and the general tenor of the informed consent, which was perceived as legalistic and unilateral. In general, the longer participants were exposed to discussion about the biobank, the less likely they were to consent to sign in. Overall, only 20% (12) of the 60 participants stated they would agree to sign in by the end of the 2 hour group session. The feedback obtained from the focus groups was used in the second stage (“real life”) of the study. A team of recruiters received extensive training to enable fruitful discussion and a detailed explanation to questions and concerns raised during the recruitment process. During the second stage of the study, after revising the consent form and training recruiters, a 53% consent rate was observed among 10,262 participants, more than 4 fold higher than estimated at the focus group stage. CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative focus group research helped identify important perceptions and concerns, which were subsequently addressed in the revised consent form and in the discussion the recruiters had with potential biobank donors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-017-0223-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5693555/ /pubmed/29149849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0223-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koren, Gideon
Beller, Daniella
Laifenfeld, Daphna
Grossman, Iris
Shalev, Varda
Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment
title Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment
title_full Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment
title_fullStr Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment
title_full_unstemmed Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment
title_short Biobanking in Israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment
title_sort biobanking in israel 2016–17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29149849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0223-8
work_keys_str_mv AT korengideon biobankinginisrael201617expressedperceptionsversusreallifeenrollment
AT bellerdaniella biobankinginisrael201617expressedperceptionsversusreallifeenrollment
AT laifenfelddaphna biobankinginisrael201617expressedperceptionsversusreallifeenrollment
AT grossmaniris biobankinginisrael201617expressedperceptionsversusreallifeenrollment
AT shalevvarda biobankinginisrael201617expressedperceptionsversusreallifeenrollment