Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers

BACKGROUND: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project developed a patient-centered model for contraceptive provision including: (1) structured, evidence-based counseling; (2) staff and health care provider education; and (3) removal of barriers such as cost and multiple appointments to initiate contraception...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Politi, Mary C., Estlund, Amy, Milne, Anne, Buckel, Christina M., Peipert, Jeffrey F., Madden, Tessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-016-0032-3
_version_ 1783279978786324480
author Politi, Mary C.
Estlund, Amy
Milne, Anne
Buckel, Christina M.
Peipert, Jeffrey F.
Madden, Tessa
author_facet Politi, Mary C.
Estlund, Amy
Milne, Anne
Buckel, Christina M.
Peipert, Jeffrey F.
Madden, Tessa
author_sort Politi, Mary C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project developed a patient-centered model for contraceptive provision including: (1) structured, evidence-based counseling; (2) staff and health care provider education; and (3) removal of barriers such as cost and multiple appointments to initiate contraception. In preparation for conducting a research study of the CHOICE model in three community health settings, we sought to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation. METHODS: Using a semi-structured interview guide guided by a framework of implementation research, we conducted 31 qualitative interviews with female patients, staff, and health care providers assessing attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to receiving contraception. We also asked about current contraceptive provision and explored organizational practices relevant to implementing the CHOICE model. We used a grounded theory approach to identify major themes. RESULTS: Many participants felt that current contraceptive provision could be improved by the CHOICE model. Potential facilitators included agreement about the necessity for improved contraceptive knowledge among patients and staff; importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling; and benefits to same-day insertion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Potential barriers included misconceptions about contraception held by staff and providers; resistance to new practices; costs associated with LARC; and scheduling challenges required for same-day insertion of LARC. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to staff and provider training, implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision needs to be supplemented by strategies to manage patient and system-level barriers. Community health center staff, providers, and patients support patient-centered contraceptive counseling to improve contraception provision if organizations can address these barriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5693580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56935802017-11-30 Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers Politi, Mary C. Estlund, Amy Milne, Anne Buckel, Christina M. Peipert, Jeffrey F. Madden, Tessa Contracept Reprod Med Research BACKGROUND: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project developed a patient-centered model for contraceptive provision including: (1) structured, evidence-based counseling; (2) staff and health care provider education; and (3) removal of barriers such as cost and multiple appointments to initiate contraception. In preparation for conducting a research study of the CHOICE model in three community health settings, we sought to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation. METHODS: Using a semi-structured interview guide guided by a framework of implementation research, we conducted 31 qualitative interviews with female patients, staff, and health care providers assessing attitudes, beliefs, and barriers to receiving contraception. We also asked about current contraceptive provision and explored organizational practices relevant to implementing the CHOICE model. We used a grounded theory approach to identify major themes. RESULTS: Many participants felt that current contraceptive provision could be improved by the CHOICE model. Potential facilitators included agreement about the necessity for improved contraceptive knowledge among patients and staff; importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling; and benefits to same-day insertion of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Potential barriers included misconceptions about contraception held by staff and providers; resistance to new practices; costs associated with LARC; and scheduling challenges required for same-day insertion of LARC. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to staff and provider training, implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision needs to be supplemented by strategies to manage patient and system-level barriers. Community health center staff, providers, and patients support patient-centered contraceptive counseling to improve contraception provision if organizations can address these barriers. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5693580/ /pubmed/29201410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-016-0032-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Politi, Mary C.
Estlund, Amy
Milne, Anne
Buckel, Christina M.
Peipert, Jeffrey F.
Madden, Tessa
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers
title Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers
title_full Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers
title_short Barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers
title_sort barriers and facilitators to implementing a patient-centered model of contraceptive provision in community health centers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-016-0032-3
work_keys_str_mv AT politimaryc barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapatientcenteredmodelofcontraceptiveprovisionincommunityhealthcenters
AT estlundamy barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapatientcenteredmodelofcontraceptiveprovisionincommunityhealthcenters
AT milneanne barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapatientcenteredmodelofcontraceptiveprovisionincommunityhealthcenters
AT buckelchristinam barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapatientcenteredmodelofcontraceptiveprovisionincommunityhealthcenters
AT peipertjeffreyf barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapatientcenteredmodelofcontraceptiveprovisionincommunityhealthcenters
AT maddentessa barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingapatientcenteredmodelofcontraceptiveprovisionincommunityhealthcenters