Cargando…
The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is possible to restore the high-frequency angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in patients suffering from a severe bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and implanted with a vestibular implant prototype. Three patients (S1–3) participated in the study....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00600 |
_version_ | 1783280133194383360 |
---|---|
author | Guinand, Nils Van de Berg, Raymond Cavuscens, Samuel Ranieri, Maurizio Schneider, Erich Lucieer, Floor Kingma, Herman Guyot, Jean-Philippe Pérez Fornos, Angélica |
author_facet | Guinand, Nils Van de Berg, Raymond Cavuscens, Samuel Ranieri, Maurizio Schneider, Erich Lucieer, Floor Kingma, Herman Guyot, Jean-Philippe Pérez Fornos, Angélica |
author_sort | Guinand, Nils |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is possible to restore the high-frequency angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in patients suffering from a severe bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and implanted with a vestibular implant prototype. Three patients (S1–3) participated in the study. They received a prototype vestibular implant with one to three electrode branches implanted in the proximity of the ampullary branches of the vestibular nerve. Five electrodes were available for electrical stimulation: one implanted in proximity of the left posterior ampullary nerve in S1, one in the left lateral and another one in the superior ampullary nerves in S2, and one in the right lateral and another one in the superior ampullary nerves in S3. The high-frequency aVOR was assessed using the video head impulse test (EyeSeeCam; EyeSeeTec, Munich, Germany), while motion-modulated electrical stimulation was delivered via one of the implanted vestibular electrodes at a time. aVOR gains were compared to control measurements obtained in the same patients when the device was not activated. In three out of the five tested electrodes the aVOR gain increased monotonically with increased stimulation strength when head impulses were delivered in the plane of the implanted canal. In these cases, gains ranging from 0.4 to values above 1 were measured. A “reversed” aVOR could also be generated when inversed stimulation paradigms were used. In most cases, the gain for excitatory head impulses was superior to that recorded for inhibitory head impulses, consistent with unilateral vestibular stimulation. Improvements of aVOR gain were generally accompanied by a concomitant decrease of corrective saccades, providing additional evidence of an effective aVOR. High inter-electrode and inter-subject variability were observed. These results, together with previous research, demonstrate that it is possible to restore the aVOR in a broad frequency range using motion-modulated electrical stimulation of the vestibular afferents. This provides additional encouraging evidence of the possibility of achieving a useful rehabilitation alternative for patients with BV in the near future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5694451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56944512017-11-28 The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans Guinand, Nils Van de Berg, Raymond Cavuscens, Samuel Ranieri, Maurizio Schneider, Erich Lucieer, Floor Kingma, Herman Guyot, Jean-Philippe Pérez Fornos, Angélica Front Neurol Neuroscience The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is possible to restore the high-frequency angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in patients suffering from a severe bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and implanted with a vestibular implant prototype. Three patients (S1–3) participated in the study. They received a prototype vestibular implant with one to three electrode branches implanted in the proximity of the ampullary branches of the vestibular nerve. Five electrodes were available for electrical stimulation: one implanted in proximity of the left posterior ampullary nerve in S1, one in the left lateral and another one in the superior ampullary nerves in S2, and one in the right lateral and another one in the superior ampullary nerves in S3. The high-frequency aVOR was assessed using the video head impulse test (EyeSeeCam; EyeSeeTec, Munich, Germany), while motion-modulated electrical stimulation was delivered via one of the implanted vestibular electrodes at a time. aVOR gains were compared to control measurements obtained in the same patients when the device was not activated. In three out of the five tested electrodes the aVOR gain increased monotonically with increased stimulation strength when head impulses were delivered in the plane of the implanted canal. In these cases, gains ranging from 0.4 to values above 1 were measured. A “reversed” aVOR could also be generated when inversed stimulation paradigms were used. In most cases, the gain for excitatory head impulses was superior to that recorded for inhibitory head impulses, consistent with unilateral vestibular stimulation. Improvements of aVOR gain were generally accompanied by a concomitant decrease of corrective saccades, providing additional evidence of an effective aVOR. High inter-electrode and inter-subject variability were observed. These results, together with previous research, demonstrate that it is possible to restore the aVOR in a broad frequency range using motion-modulated electrical stimulation of the vestibular afferents. This provides additional encouraging evidence of the possibility of achieving a useful rehabilitation alternative for patients with BV in the near future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5694451/ /pubmed/29184530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00600 Text en Copyright © 2017 Guinand, Van de Berg, Cavuscens, Ranieri, Schneider, Lucieer, Kingma, Guyot and Pérez Fornos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Guinand, Nils Van de Berg, Raymond Cavuscens, Samuel Ranieri, Maurizio Schneider, Erich Lucieer, Floor Kingma, Herman Guyot, Jean-Philippe Pérez Fornos, Angélica The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans |
title | The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans |
title_full | The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans |
title_fullStr | The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans |
title_full_unstemmed | The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans |
title_short | The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans |
title_sort | video head impulse test to assess the efficacy of vestibular implants in humans |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guinandnils thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT vandebergraymond thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT cavuscenssamuel thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT ranierimaurizio thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT schneidererich thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT lucieerfloor thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT kingmaherman thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT guyotjeanphilippe thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT perezfornosangelica thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT guinandnils videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT vandebergraymond videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT cavuscenssamuel videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT ranierimaurizio videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT schneidererich videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT lucieerfloor videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT kingmaherman videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT guyotjeanphilippe videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans AT perezfornosangelica videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans |