Cargando…

The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is possible to restore the high-frequency angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in patients suffering from a severe bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and implanted with a vestibular implant prototype. Three patients (S1–3) participated in the study....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guinand, Nils, Van de Berg, Raymond, Cavuscens, Samuel, Ranieri, Maurizio, Schneider, Erich, Lucieer, Floor, Kingma, Herman, Guyot, Jean-Philippe, Pérez Fornos, Angélica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00600
_version_ 1783280133194383360
author Guinand, Nils
Van de Berg, Raymond
Cavuscens, Samuel
Ranieri, Maurizio
Schneider, Erich
Lucieer, Floor
Kingma, Herman
Guyot, Jean-Philippe
Pérez Fornos, Angélica
author_facet Guinand, Nils
Van de Berg, Raymond
Cavuscens, Samuel
Ranieri, Maurizio
Schneider, Erich
Lucieer, Floor
Kingma, Herman
Guyot, Jean-Philippe
Pérez Fornos, Angélica
author_sort Guinand, Nils
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is possible to restore the high-frequency angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in patients suffering from a severe bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and implanted with a vestibular implant prototype. Three patients (S1–3) participated in the study. They received a prototype vestibular implant with one to three electrode branches implanted in the proximity of the ampullary branches of the vestibular nerve. Five electrodes were available for electrical stimulation: one implanted in proximity of the left posterior ampullary nerve in S1, one in the left lateral and another one in the superior ampullary nerves in S2, and one in the right lateral and another one in the superior ampullary nerves in S3. The high-frequency aVOR was assessed using the video head impulse test (EyeSeeCam; EyeSeeTec, Munich, Germany), while motion-modulated electrical stimulation was delivered via one of the implanted vestibular electrodes at a time. aVOR gains were compared to control measurements obtained in the same patients when the device was not activated. In three out of the five tested electrodes the aVOR gain increased monotonically with increased stimulation strength when head impulses were delivered in the plane of the implanted canal. In these cases, gains ranging from 0.4 to values above 1 were measured. A “reversed” aVOR could also be generated when inversed stimulation paradigms were used. In most cases, the gain for excitatory head impulses was superior to that recorded for inhibitory head impulses, consistent with unilateral vestibular stimulation. Improvements of aVOR gain were generally accompanied by a concomitant decrease of corrective saccades, providing additional evidence of an effective aVOR. High inter-electrode and inter-subject variability were observed. These results, together with previous research, demonstrate that it is possible to restore the aVOR in a broad frequency range using motion-modulated electrical stimulation of the vestibular afferents. This provides additional encouraging evidence of the possibility of achieving a useful rehabilitation alternative for patients with BV in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5694451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56944512017-11-28 The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans Guinand, Nils Van de Berg, Raymond Cavuscens, Samuel Ranieri, Maurizio Schneider, Erich Lucieer, Floor Kingma, Herman Guyot, Jean-Philippe Pérez Fornos, Angélica Front Neurol Neuroscience The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is possible to restore the high-frequency angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) in patients suffering from a severe bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and implanted with a vestibular implant prototype. Three patients (S1–3) participated in the study. They received a prototype vestibular implant with one to three electrode branches implanted in the proximity of the ampullary branches of the vestibular nerve. Five electrodes were available for electrical stimulation: one implanted in proximity of the left posterior ampullary nerve in S1, one in the left lateral and another one in the superior ampullary nerves in S2, and one in the right lateral and another one in the superior ampullary nerves in S3. The high-frequency aVOR was assessed using the video head impulse test (EyeSeeCam; EyeSeeTec, Munich, Germany), while motion-modulated electrical stimulation was delivered via one of the implanted vestibular electrodes at a time. aVOR gains were compared to control measurements obtained in the same patients when the device was not activated. In three out of the five tested electrodes the aVOR gain increased monotonically with increased stimulation strength when head impulses were delivered in the plane of the implanted canal. In these cases, gains ranging from 0.4 to values above 1 were measured. A “reversed” aVOR could also be generated when inversed stimulation paradigms were used. In most cases, the gain for excitatory head impulses was superior to that recorded for inhibitory head impulses, consistent with unilateral vestibular stimulation. Improvements of aVOR gain were generally accompanied by a concomitant decrease of corrective saccades, providing additional evidence of an effective aVOR. High inter-electrode and inter-subject variability were observed. These results, together with previous research, demonstrate that it is possible to restore the aVOR in a broad frequency range using motion-modulated electrical stimulation of the vestibular afferents. This provides additional encouraging evidence of the possibility of achieving a useful rehabilitation alternative for patients with BV in the near future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5694451/ /pubmed/29184530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00600 Text en Copyright © 2017 Guinand, Van de Berg, Cavuscens, Ranieri, Schneider, Lucieer, Kingma, Guyot and Pérez Fornos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Guinand, Nils
Van de Berg, Raymond
Cavuscens, Samuel
Ranieri, Maurizio
Schneider, Erich
Lucieer, Floor
Kingma, Herman
Guyot, Jean-Philippe
Pérez Fornos, Angélica
The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans
title The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans
title_full The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans
title_fullStr The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans
title_full_unstemmed The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans
title_short The Video Head Impulse Test to Assess the Efficacy of Vestibular Implants in Humans
title_sort video head impulse test to assess the efficacy of vestibular implants in humans
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00600
work_keys_str_mv AT guinandnils thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT vandebergraymond thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT cavuscenssamuel thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT ranierimaurizio thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT schneidererich thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT lucieerfloor thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT kingmaherman thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT guyotjeanphilippe thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT perezfornosangelica thevideoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT guinandnils videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT vandebergraymond videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT cavuscenssamuel videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT ranierimaurizio videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT schneidererich videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT lucieerfloor videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT kingmaherman videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT guyotjeanphilippe videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans
AT perezfornosangelica videoheadimpulsetesttoassesstheefficacyofvestibularimplantsinhumans