Cargando…

One- vs. Three-Fraction Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma: Single Institution Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Early reports of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) used single fraction, but eventually shifted to multifraction regimens. We conducted a single institution review of our patients treated with single- or multifraction SBRT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sutera, Philip Anthony, Bernard, Mark E., Gill, Beant S., Harper, Kamran K., Quan, Kimmen, Bahary, Nathan, Burton, Steven A., Zeh, Herbert, Heron, Dwight E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00272
_version_ 1783280141591379968
author Sutera, Philip Anthony
Bernard, Mark E.
Gill, Beant S.
Harper, Kamran K.
Quan, Kimmen
Bahary, Nathan
Burton, Steven A.
Zeh, Herbert
Heron, Dwight E.
author_facet Sutera, Philip Anthony
Bernard, Mark E.
Gill, Beant S.
Harper, Kamran K.
Quan, Kimmen
Bahary, Nathan
Burton, Steven A.
Zeh, Herbert
Heron, Dwight E.
author_sort Sutera, Philip Anthony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Early reports of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) used single fraction, but eventually shifted to multifraction regimens. We conducted a single institution review of our patients treated with single- or multifraction SBRT to determine whether any outcome differences existed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with SBRT in any setting for PDAC at our facility were included, from 2004 to 2014. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), regional control (RC), distant metastasis (DM), and late grade 3 or greater radiation toxicities from the time of SBRT were calculated using Kaplan–Meier estimation to either the date of last follow-up/death or local/regional/distant failure. RESULTS: We identified 289 patients (291 lesions) with pathologically confirmed PDAC. Median age was 69 (range, 33–90) years. Median gross tumor volume was 12.3 (8.6–21.3) cm(3) and planning target volume 17.9 (12–27) cm(3). Single fraction was used in 90 (30.9%) and multifraction in 201 (69.1%) lesions. At a median follow-up of 17.3 months (IQR 10.1–29.3 months), the median survival for the entire cohort 17.8 months with a 2-year OS of 35.3%. Univariate analysis showed multifraction schemes to have a higher 2-year OS 30.5% vs. 37.5% (p = 0.019), it did not hold significance on MVA. Multifractionation schemes were found to have a higher LC on MVA (HR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.33–0.85, p = 0.009). At 2 years, late grade 3+ toxicity was 2.5%. Post-SBRT CA19-9 was found on MVA to be a prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI, 1.01–1.01, p = 0.009), RC (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.01, p = 0.02), and DM (HR = 1.01, 95% CI, 1.01–1.01, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our single institution retrospective review is the largest to date comparing single and multifraction SBRT and the first to show multifraction regimen SBRT to have a higher LC than single fractionation. Additionally, we show low rates of severe late toxicity with SBRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5694485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56944852017-11-28 One- vs. Three-Fraction Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma: Single Institution Retrospective Review Sutera, Philip Anthony Bernard, Mark E. Gill, Beant S. Harper, Kamran K. Quan, Kimmen Bahary, Nathan Burton, Steven A. Zeh, Herbert Heron, Dwight E. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Early reports of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) used single fraction, but eventually shifted to multifraction regimens. We conducted a single institution review of our patients treated with single- or multifraction SBRT to determine whether any outcome differences existed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated with SBRT in any setting for PDAC at our facility were included, from 2004 to 2014. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), regional control (RC), distant metastasis (DM), and late grade 3 or greater radiation toxicities from the time of SBRT were calculated using Kaplan–Meier estimation to either the date of last follow-up/death or local/regional/distant failure. RESULTS: We identified 289 patients (291 lesions) with pathologically confirmed PDAC. Median age was 69 (range, 33–90) years. Median gross tumor volume was 12.3 (8.6–21.3) cm(3) and planning target volume 17.9 (12–27) cm(3). Single fraction was used in 90 (30.9%) and multifraction in 201 (69.1%) lesions. At a median follow-up of 17.3 months (IQR 10.1–29.3 months), the median survival for the entire cohort 17.8 months with a 2-year OS of 35.3%. Univariate analysis showed multifraction schemes to have a higher 2-year OS 30.5% vs. 37.5% (p = 0.019), it did not hold significance on MVA. Multifractionation schemes were found to have a higher LC on MVA (HR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.33–0.85, p = 0.009). At 2 years, late grade 3+ toxicity was 2.5%. Post-SBRT CA19-9 was found on MVA to be a prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI, 1.01–1.01, p = 0.009), RC (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.01, p = 0.02), and DM (HR = 1.01, 95% CI, 1.01–1.01, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our single institution retrospective review is the largest to date comparing single and multifraction SBRT and the first to show multifraction regimen SBRT to have a higher LC than single fractionation. Additionally, we show low rates of severe late toxicity with SBRT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5694485/ /pubmed/29184848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00272 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sutera, Bernard, Gill, Harper, Quan, Bahary, Burton, Zeh and Heron. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Sutera, Philip Anthony
Bernard, Mark E.
Gill, Beant S.
Harper, Kamran K.
Quan, Kimmen
Bahary, Nathan
Burton, Steven A.
Zeh, Herbert
Heron, Dwight E.
One- vs. Three-Fraction Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma: Single Institution Retrospective Review
title One- vs. Three-Fraction Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma: Single Institution Retrospective Review
title_full One- vs. Three-Fraction Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma: Single Institution Retrospective Review
title_fullStr One- vs. Three-Fraction Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma: Single Institution Retrospective Review
title_full_unstemmed One- vs. Three-Fraction Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma: Single Institution Retrospective Review
title_short One- vs. Three-Fraction Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma: Single Institution Retrospective Review
title_sort one- vs. three-fraction pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic carcinoma: single institution retrospective review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00272
work_keys_str_mv AT suteraphilipanthony onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview
AT bernardmarke onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview
AT gillbeants onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview
AT harperkamrank onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview
AT quankimmen onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview
AT baharynathan onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview
AT burtonstevena onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview
AT zehherbert onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview
AT herondwighte onevsthreefractionpancreaticstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforpancreaticcarcinomasingleinstitutionretrospectivereview