Cargando…

Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use in livestock production is an important contemporary issue, which is of public interest worldwide. Antimicrobials are not freely available to Austrian farmers and can only be administered to livestock by veterinarians, or by farmers who are trained members of the Animal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firth, Clair L., Käsbohrer, Annemarie, Schleicher, Corina, Fuchs, Klemens, Egger-Danner, Christa, Mayerhofer, Martin, Schobesberger, Hermann, Köfer, Josef, Obritzhauser, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29158993
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4072
_version_ 1783280176322314240
author Firth, Clair L.
Käsbohrer, Annemarie
Schleicher, Corina
Fuchs, Klemens
Egger-Danner, Christa
Mayerhofer, Martin
Schobesberger, Hermann
Köfer, Josef
Obritzhauser, Walter
author_facet Firth, Clair L.
Käsbohrer, Annemarie
Schleicher, Corina
Fuchs, Klemens
Egger-Danner, Christa
Mayerhofer, Martin
Schobesberger, Hermann
Köfer, Josef
Obritzhauser, Walter
author_sort Firth, Clair L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use in livestock production is an important contemporary issue, which is of public interest worldwide. Antimicrobials are not freely available to Austrian farmers and can only be administered to livestock by veterinarians, or by farmers who are trained members of the Animal Health Service. Since 2015, veterinarians have been required by law to report antimicrobials dispensed to farmers for use in food-producing animals. The study presented here went further than the statutory framework, and collected data on antimicrobials dispensed to farmers and those administered by veterinarians. METHODS: Seventeen veterinary practices were enrolled in the study via convenience sampling. These veterinarians were asked to contact interested dairy farmers regarding participation in the study (respondent-driven sampling). Data were collected from veterinary practice software between 1st October 2015 and 30th September 2016. Electronic data (89.4%) were transferred via an online interface and paper records (10.6%) were entered by the authors. Antimicrobial treatments with respect to udder disease were analysed by number of defined daily doses per cow and year (nDDD(vet)/cow/year), based on the European Medicines Agency technical unit, Defined Daily Dose for animals (DDD(vet)). Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to analyse the results. RESULTS: Antimicrobial use data from a total of 248 dairy farms were collected during the study, 232 of these farms treated cows with antibiotics; dry cow therapy was excluded from the current analysis. The mean number of DDD(vet)/cow/year for the antimicrobial treatment of all udder disease was 1.33 DDD(vet)/cow/year. Of these treatments, 0.73 DDD(vet)/cow/year were classed as highest priority critically important antimicrobials (HPCIAs), according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition. The Wilcoxon rank sum test determined a statistically significant difference between the median number of DDD(vet)/cow/year for acute and chronic mastitis treatment (W = 10,734, p < 0.001). The most commonly administered antimicrobial class for the treatment of acute mastitis was beta-lactams. Intramammary penicillin was used at a mean of 0.63 DDD(vet)/cow/year, followed by the third generation cephalosporin, cefoperazone, (a HPCIA) at 0.60 DDD(vet)/cow/year. Systemic antimicrobial treatments were used at a lower overall level than intramammary treatments for acute mastitis. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that Austrian dairy cows in the study population were treated with antimicrobial substances for udder diseases at a relatively low frequency, however, a substantial proportion of these treatments were with substances considered critically important for human health. While it is vital that sick cows are treated, reductions in the overall use of antimicrobials, and critically important substances in particular, are still possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5694652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56946522017-11-20 Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records Firth, Clair L. Käsbohrer, Annemarie Schleicher, Corina Fuchs, Klemens Egger-Danner, Christa Mayerhofer, Martin Schobesberger, Hermann Köfer, Josef Obritzhauser, Walter PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use in livestock production is an important contemporary issue, which is of public interest worldwide. Antimicrobials are not freely available to Austrian farmers and can only be administered to livestock by veterinarians, or by farmers who are trained members of the Animal Health Service. Since 2015, veterinarians have been required by law to report antimicrobials dispensed to farmers for use in food-producing animals. The study presented here went further than the statutory framework, and collected data on antimicrobials dispensed to farmers and those administered by veterinarians. METHODS: Seventeen veterinary practices were enrolled in the study via convenience sampling. These veterinarians were asked to contact interested dairy farmers regarding participation in the study (respondent-driven sampling). Data were collected from veterinary practice software between 1st October 2015 and 30th September 2016. Electronic data (89.4%) were transferred via an online interface and paper records (10.6%) were entered by the authors. Antimicrobial treatments with respect to udder disease were analysed by number of defined daily doses per cow and year (nDDD(vet)/cow/year), based on the European Medicines Agency technical unit, Defined Daily Dose for animals (DDD(vet)). Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to analyse the results. RESULTS: Antimicrobial use data from a total of 248 dairy farms were collected during the study, 232 of these farms treated cows with antibiotics; dry cow therapy was excluded from the current analysis. The mean number of DDD(vet)/cow/year for the antimicrobial treatment of all udder disease was 1.33 DDD(vet)/cow/year. Of these treatments, 0.73 DDD(vet)/cow/year were classed as highest priority critically important antimicrobials (HPCIAs), according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition. The Wilcoxon rank sum test determined a statistically significant difference between the median number of DDD(vet)/cow/year for acute and chronic mastitis treatment (W = 10,734, p < 0.001). The most commonly administered antimicrobial class for the treatment of acute mastitis was beta-lactams. Intramammary penicillin was used at a mean of 0.63 DDD(vet)/cow/year, followed by the third generation cephalosporin, cefoperazone, (a HPCIA) at 0.60 DDD(vet)/cow/year. Systemic antimicrobial treatments were used at a lower overall level than intramammary treatments for acute mastitis. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that Austrian dairy cows in the study population were treated with antimicrobial substances for udder diseases at a relatively low frequency, however, a substantial proportion of these treatments were with substances considered critically important for human health. While it is vital that sick cows are treated, reductions in the overall use of antimicrobials, and critically important substances in particular, are still possible. PeerJ Inc. 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5694652/ /pubmed/29158993 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4072 Text en ©2017 Firth et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Firth, Clair L.
Käsbohrer, Annemarie
Schleicher, Corina
Fuchs, Klemens
Egger-Danner, Christa
Mayerhofer, Martin
Schobesberger, Hermann
Köfer, Josef
Obritzhauser, Walter
Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records
title Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records
title_full Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records
title_fullStr Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records
title_short Antimicrobial consumption on Austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records
title_sort antimicrobial consumption on austrian dairy farms: an observational study of udder disease treatments based on veterinary medication records
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29158993
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4072
work_keys_str_mv AT firthclairl antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords
AT kasbohrerannemarie antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords
AT schleichercorina antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords
AT fuchsklemens antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords
AT eggerdannerchrista antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords
AT mayerhofermartin antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords
AT schobesbergerhermann antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords
AT koferjosef antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords
AT obritzhauserwalter antimicrobialconsumptiononaustriandairyfarmsanobservationalstudyofudderdiseasetreatmentsbasedonveterinarymedicationrecords