Cargando…

Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: The incidence of thyroid cancer is relatively high, especially in young women, and postoperative scarring after thyroidectomy is an important problem for both patients and clinicians. Currently, there is no available product that can be used for wound protection during thyroid surgery. We u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Kwan Ho, Kim, Eun Young, Park, Chan Heun, Park, Yong Lai, Yun, Ji Sup, Lee, Ga Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184875
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.93.5.231
_version_ 1783280181548417024
author Lee, Kwan Ho
Kim, Eun Young
Park, Chan Heun
Park, Yong Lai
Yun, Ji Sup
Lee, Ga Young
author_facet Lee, Kwan Ho
Kim, Eun Young
Park, Chan Heun
Park, Yong Lai
Yun, Ji Sup
Lee, Ga Young
author_sort Lee, Kwan Ho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The incidence of thyroid cancer is relatively high, especially in young women, and postoperative scarring after thyroidectomy is an important problem for both patients and clinicians. Currently, there is no available product that can be used for wound protection during thyroid surgery. We used the EASY-EYE_C, a new silicone-based wound protector. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of the EASY-EYE_C with surgical scars. We studied 66 patients who underwent conventional total thyroidectomy or hemithyroidectomy performed by a single surgeon from August 2015 to June 2016. At 6-week follow-up, a single blinded physician observed the wounds to make clinical assessments using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and a modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). RESULTS: There were no significant differences by sex, age, type of surgery, body mass index, length of wound, incision site (from sternal notch), or thyroid weight, but the duration of operation was significantly shorter in the experimental group (E group). The e-group also had better POSAS scores than the control group (C group), with means of 43.2 (standard deviation [SD], ±15.9) versus 68.3 (SD, ±21.5), respectively (P < 0.05). The modified SBSES and VSS scores were similar to those from the POSAS. CONCLUSION: In this study, all scores for evaluating outcomes were higher in the E group than in the C group. In addition, the operation time was significantly shorter in the E group. Therefore, the EASY-EYE_C may be useful for improving the cosmetic outcomes of conventional thyroid surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5694713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56947132017-11-28 Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial Lee, Kwan Ho Kim, Eun Young Park, Chan Heun Park, Yong Lai Yun, Ji Sup Lee, Ga Young Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: The incidence of thyroid cancer is relatively high, especially in young women, and postoperative scarring after thyroidectomy is an important problem for both patients and clinicians. Currently, there is no available product that can be used for wound protection during thyroid surgery. We used the EASY-EYE_C, a new silicone-based wound protector. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of the EASY-EYE_C with surgical scars. We studied 66 patients who underwent conventional total thyroidectomy or hemithyroidectomy performed by a single surgeon from August 2015 to June 2016. At 6-week follow-up, a single blinded physician observed the wounds to make clinical assessments using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and a modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). RESULTS: There were no significant differences by sex, age, type of surgery, body mass index, length of wound, incision site (from sternal notch), or thyroid weight, but the duration of operation was significantly shorter in the experimental group (E group). The e-group also had better POSAS scores than the control group (C group), with means of 43.2 (standard deviation [SD], ±15.9) versus 68.3 (SD, ±21.5), respectively (P < 0.05). The modified SBSES and VSS scores were similar to those from the POSAS. CONCLUSION: In this study, all scores for evaluating outcomes were higher in the E group than in the C group. In addition, the operation time was significantly shorter in the E group. Therefore, the EASY-EYE_C may be useful for improving the cosmetic outcomes of conventional thyroid surgery. The Korean Surgical Society 2017-11 2017-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5694713/ /pubmed/29184875 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.93.5.231 Text en Copyright © 2017, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Kwan Ho
Kim, Eun Young
Park, Chan Heun
Park, Yong Lai
Yun, Ji Sup
Lee, Ga Young
Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_full Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_short Assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the EASY-EYE_C: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_sort assessing cosmetic results after conventional thyroidectomy using the easy-eye_c: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184875
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.93.5.231
work_keys_str_mv AT leekwanho assessingcosmeticresultsafterconventionalthyroidectomyusingtheeasyeyecadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimeunyoung assessingcosmeticresultsafterconventionalthyroidectomyusingtheeasyeyecadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkchanheun assessingcosmeticresultsafterconventionalthyroidectomyusingtheeasyeyecadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkyonglai assessingcosmeticresultsafterconventionalthyroidectomyusingtheeasyeyecadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yunjisup assessingcosmeticresultsafterconventionalthyroidectomyusingtheeasyeyecadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leegayoung assessingcosmeticresultsafterconventionalthyroidectomyusingtheeasyeyecadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial