Cargando…

Methane Adsorption in Zr-Based MOFs: Comparison and Critical Evaluation of Force Fields

[Image: see text] The search for nanoporous materials that are highly performing for gas storage and separation is one of the contemporary challenges in material design. The computational tools to aid these experimental efforts are widely available, and adsorption isotherms are routinely computed fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vandenbrande, Steven, Verstraelen, Toon, Gutiérrez-Sevillano, Juan José, Waroquier, Michel, Van Speybroeck, Veronique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29170687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08971
_version_ 1783280228212146176
author Vandenbrande, Steven
Verstraelen, Toon
Gutiérrez-Sevillano, Juan José
Waroquier, Michel
Van Speybroeck, Veronique
author_facet Vandenbrande, Steven
Verstraelen, Toon
Gutiérrez-Sevillano, Juan José
Waroquier, Michel
Van Speybroeck, Veronique
author_sort Vandenbrande, Steven
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The search for nanoporous materials that are highly performing for gas storage and separation is one of the contemporary challenges in material design. The computational tools to aid these experimental efforts are widely available, and adsorption isotherms are routinely computed for huge sets of (hypothetical) frameworks. Clearly the computational results depend on the interactions between the adsorbed species and the adsorbent, which are commonly described using force fields. In this paper, an extensive comparison and in-depth investigation of several force fields from literature is reported for the case of methane adsorption in the Zr-based Metal–Organic Frameworks UiO-66, UiO-67, DUT-52, NU-1000, and MOF-808. Significant quantitative differences in the computed uptake are observed when comparing different force fields, but most qualitative features are common which suggests some predictive power of the simulations when it comes to these properties. More insight into the host–guest interactions is obtained by benchmarking the force fields with an extensive number of ab initio computed single molecule interaction energies. This analysis at the molecular level reveals that especially ab initio derived force fields perform well in reproducing the ab initio interaction energies. Finally, the high sensitivity of uptake predictions on the underlying potential energy surface is explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5694967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56949672017-11-21 Methane Adsorption in Zr-Based MOFs: Comparison and Critical Evaluation of Force Fields Vandenbrande, Steven Verstraelen, Toon Gutiérrez-Sevillano, Juan José Waroquier, Michel Van Speybroeck, Veronique J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces [Image: see text] The search for nanoporous materials that are highly performing for gas storage and separation is one of the contemporary challenges in material design. The computational tools to aid these experimental efforts are widely available, and adsorption isotherms are routinely computed for huge sets of (hypothetical) frameworks. Clearly the computational results depend on the interactions between the adsorbed species and the adsorbent, which are commonly described using force fields. In this paper, an extensive comparison and in-depth investigation of several force fields from literature is reported for the case of methane adsorption in the Zr-based Metal–Organic Frameworks UiO-66, UiO-67, DUT-52, NU-1000, and MOF-808. Significant quantitative differences in the computed uptake are observed when comparing different force fields, but most qualitative features are common which suggests some predictive power of the simulations when it comes to these properties. More insight into the host–guest interactions is obtained by benchmarking the force fields with an extensive number of ab initio computed single molecule interaction energies. This analysis at the molecular level reveals that especially ab initio derived force fields perform well in reproducing the ab initio interaction energies. Finally, the high sensitivity of uptake predictions on the underlying potential energy surface is explored. American Chemical Society 2017-10-24 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5694967/ /pubmed/29170687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08971 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Vandenbrande, Steven
Verstraelen, Toon
Gutiérrez-Sevillano, Juan José
Waroquier, Michel
Van Speybroeck, Veronique
Methane Adsorption in Zr-Based MOFs: Comparison and Critical Evaluation of Force Fields
title Methane Adsorption in Zr-Based MOFs: Comparison and Critical Evaluation of Force Fields
title_full Methane Adsorption in Zr-Based MOFs: Comparison and Critical Evaluation of Force Fields
title_fullStr Methane Adsorption in Zr-Based MOFs: Comparison and Critical Evaluation of Force Fields
title_full_unstemmed Methane Adsorption in Zr-Based MOFs: Comparison and Critical Evaluation of Force Fields
title_short Methane Adsorption in Zr-Based MOFs: Comparison and Critical Evaluation of Force Fields
title_sort methane adsorption in zr-based mofs: comparison and critical evaluation of force fields
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5694967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29170687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08971
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbrandesteven methaneadsorptioninzrbasedmofscomparisonandcriticalevaluationofforcefields
AT verstraelentoon methaneadsorptioninzrbasedmofscomparisonandcriticalevaluationofforcefields
AT gutierrezsevillanojuanjose methaneadsorptioninzrbasedmofscomparisonandcriticalevaluationofforcefields
AT waroquiermichel methaneadsorptioninzrbasedmofscomparisonandcriticalevaluationofforcefields
AT vanspeybroeckveronique methaneadsorptioninzrbasedmofscomparisonandcriticalevaluationofforcefields