Cargando…

Comparison of the Anteroposterior and Posterior Approaches for Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Tuberculous Psoas Abscess

BACKGROUND: Tuberculous infection of the lumbar spine may be associated with psoas abscess. The aim of this clinical study was to compare the outcome of posterior lumbar debridement and spinal fusion, combined with either a one-stage anteroposterior (AP) or posterior (P) approach to percutaneous cat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Fei, Zhou, Qingzhong, Feng, Daxiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29127771
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.902848
_version_ 1783280253139943424
author Ye, Fei
Zhou, Qingzhong
Feng, Daxiong
author_facet Ye, Fei
Zhou, Qingzhong
Feng, Daxiong
author_sort Ye, Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tuberculous infection of the lumbar spine may be associated with psoas abscess. The aim of this clinical study was to compare the outcome of posterior lumbar debridement and spinal fusion, combined with either a one-stage anteroposterior (AP) or posterior (P) approach to percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis with psoas abscess. MATERIAL/METHODS: From January 2008 to June 2012, 74 patients were diagnosed at our hospital with lumbar tuberculosis with unilateral or bilateral psoas abscess. Forty-three patients underwent P-PCD (group A), and 31 patients underwent AP-PCD (group B). Operative duration, blood loss, the length of hospital stay, spinal correction, clinical cure rate, and other clinical outcomes in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Comparison of the outcome for the P-PCD and AP-PCD patients showed that there was no significant difference in outcome for spinal bone fusion, correction of spinal deformity, or cure rate from tuberculosis infection (P>0.05). Blood loss, operative time, and the length of hospital stay for patients in group A, the P-PCD group, were significantly less than for group B, the AP-PCD group (P<0.05). Also, group B, the AP-PCD group, had an increased incidence of complications than group A, the P-PCD group, leading to increased hospital stay (OR 3.04, CI 0.52–17.75). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of tuberculous psoas abscess using PCD, the posterior approach may achieve the same clinical efficacy as the anteroposterior approach, but is associated with reduced length of hospital stay, and lower risk of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56950932017-11-29 Comparison of the Anteroposterior and Posterior Approaches for Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Tuberculous Psoas Abscess Ye, Fei Zhou, Qingzhong Feng, Daxiong Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Tuberculous infection of the lumbar spine may be associated with psoas abscess. The aim of this clinical study was to compare the outcome of posterior lumbar debridement and spinal fusion, combined with either a one-stage anteroposterior (AP) or posterior (P) approach to percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis with psoas abscess. MATERIAL/METHODS: From January 2008 to June 2012, 74 patients were diagnosed at our hospital with lumbar tuberculosis with unilateral or bilateral psoas abscess. Forty-three patients underwent P-PCD (group A), and 31 patients underwent AP-PCD (group B). Operative duration, blood loss, the length of hospital stay, spinal correction, clinical cure rate, and other clinical outcomes in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Comparison of the outcome for the P-PCD and AP-PCD patients showed that there was no significant difference in outcome for spinal bone fusion, correction of spinal deformity, or cure rate from tuberculosis infection (P>0.05). Blood loss, operative time, and the length of hospital stay for patients in group A, the P-PCD group, were significantly less than for group B, the AP-PCD group (P<0.05). Also, group B, the AP-PCD group, had an increased incidence of complications than group A, the P-PCD group, leading to increased hospital stay (OR 3.04, CI 0.52–17.75). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of tuberculous psoas abscess using PCD, the posterior approach may achieve the same clinical efficacy as the anteroposterior approach, but is associated with reduced length of hospital stay, and lower risk of complications. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2017-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5695093/ /pubmed/29127771 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.902848 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2017 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ye, Fei
Zhou, Qingzhong
Feng, Daxiong
Comparison of the Anteroposterior and Posterior Approaches for Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Tuberculous Psoas Abscess
title Comparison of the Anteroposterior and Posterior Approaches for Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Tuberculous Psoas Abscess
title_full Comparison of the Anteroposterior and Posterior Approaches for Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Tuberculous Psoas Abscess
title_fullStr Comparison of the Anteroposterior and Posterior Approaches for Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Tuberculous Psoas Abscess
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Anteroposterior and Posterior Approaches for Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Tuberculous Psoas Abscess
title_short Comparison of the Anteroposterior and Posterior Approaches for Percutaneous Catheter Drainage of Tuberculous Psoas Abscess
title_sort comparison of the anteroposterior and posterior approaches for percutaneous catheter drainage of tuberculous psoas abscess
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29127771
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.902848
work_keys_str_mv AT yefei comparisonoftheanteroposteriorandposteriorapproachesforpercutaneouscatheterdrainageoftuberculouspsoasabscess
AT zhouqingzhong comparisonoftheanteroposteriorandposteriorapproachesforpercutaneouscatheterdrainageoftuberculouspsoasabscess
AT fengdaxiong comparisonoftheanteroposteriorandposteriorapproachesforpercutaneouscatheterdrainageoftuberculouspsoasabscess