Haemodynamic monitoring of cardiac status using heart sounds from an implanted cardiac device

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the haemodynamic correlates of heart sound (HS) parameters such as third HS (S3), first HS (S1), and HS‐based systolic time intervals (HSTIs) from an implantable cardiac device. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two unique animal models (10 swine with myocardial ischaemia and 11 canines with pulmonary oedema) were used to evaluate haemodynamic correlates of S1, S3, and HSTIs, namely, HS‐based pre‐ejection period (HSPEP), HS‐based ejection time (HSET), and the ratio HSPEP/HSET during acute haemodynamic perturbations. The HS was measured using implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator devices simultaneously with haemodynamic references such as left atrial (LA) pressure and left ventricular (LV) pressure. In the ischaemia model, S1 amplitude (r = 0.76 ± 0.038; P = 0.002), HSPEP (r = −0.56 ± 0.07; P = 0.002), and HSPEP/HSET (r = −0.42 ± 0.1; P = 0.002) were significantly correlated with LV dP/dt(max). In contrast, HSET was poorly correlated with LV dP/dt(max) (r = 0.14 ± 0.14; P = 0.23). In the oedema model, a physiological delayed response was observed in S3 amplitude after acute haemodynamic perturbations. After adjusting for the delay, S3 amplitude significantly correlated with LA pressure in individual animals (r = 0.71 ± 0.07; max: 0.92; min: 0.17) as well as in aggregate (r = 0.62; P < 0.001). The S3 amplitude was able to detect elevated LA pressure, defined as >25 mmHg, with a sensitivity = 58% and specificity = 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The HS parameters such as S1, S3, and HSTIs measured using implantable devices significantly correlated with haemodynamic changes in acute animal models, suggesting potential utility for remote heart failure patient monitoring.