Cargando…
Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an effective evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol of perioperative care, but its roles in thoracic surgery remain unclear. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180901 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150500 |
_version_ | 1783280279606001664 |
---|---|
author | Li, Shuangjiang Zhou, Kun Che, Guowei Yang, Mei Su, Jianhua Shen, Cheng Yu, Pengming |
author_facet | Li, Shuangjiang Zhou, Kun Che, Guowei Yang, Mei Su, Jianhua Shen, Cheng Yu, Pengming |
author_sort | Li, Shuangjiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an effective evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol of perioperative care, but its roles in thoracic surgery remain unclear. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of the ERAS programs for lung cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify the RCTs that implemented an ERAS program encompassing more than four care elements within at least two phases of perioperative care in lung cancer surgery. The heterogeneity levels between studies were estimated by the Cochrane Collaborations. A qualitative review was performed if considerable heterogeneity was revealed. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference served as the summarized statistics for the meta-analyses. Additional analyses were also performed to perceive potential bias risks. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs enrolling 486 patients were included. The meta-analysis indicated that the ERAS group patients had significantly lower morbidity rates (RR=0.64; p<0.001), especially the rates of pulmonary (RR=0.43; p<0.001) and surgical complications (RR=0.46; p=0.010), than those of control group patients. No significant reduction was found in the in-hospital mortality (RR=0.70; p=0.58) or cardiovascular complications (RR=1.46; p=0.25). In the qualitative review, most of the evidence reported significantly shortened length of hospital and intensive care unit stay and decreased hospitalization costs in the ERAS-treated patients. No significant publication bias was detected in the meta-analyses. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrates that the implementation of an ERAS program for lung cancer surgery can effectively accelerate postoperative recovery and save hospitalization costs without compromising patients’ safety. A worldwide consensus guideline is urgently required to standardize the ERAS protocols for elective lung resections in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5695257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56952572017-11-27 Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Li, Shuangjiang Zhou, Kun Che, Guowei Yang, Mei Su, Jianhua Shen, Cheng Yu, Pengming Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an effective evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol of perioperative care, but its roles in thoracic surgery remain unclear. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of the ERAS programs for lung cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify the RCTs that implemented an ERAS program encompassing more than four care elements within at least two phases of perioperative care in lung cancer surgery. The heterogeneity levels between studies were estimated by the Cochrane Collaborations. A qualitative review was performed if considerable heterogeneity was revealed. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference served as the summarized statistics for the meta-analyses. Additional analyses were also performed to perceive potential bias risks. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs enrolling 486 patients were included. The meta-analysis indicated that the ERAS group patients had significantly lower morbidity rates (RR=0.64; p<0.001), especially the rates of pulmonary (RR=0.43; p<0.001) and surgical complications (RR=0.46; p=0.010), than those of control group patients. No significant reduction was found in the in-hospital mortality (RR=0.70; p=0.58) or cardiovascular complications (RR=1.46; p=0.25). In the qualitative review, most of the evidence reported significantly shortened length of hospital and intensive care unit stay and decreased hospitalization costs in the ERAS-treated patients. No significant publication bias was detected in the meta-analyses. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrates that the implementation of an ERAS program for lung cancer surgery can effectively accelerate postoperative recovery and save hospitalization costs without compromising patients’ safety. A worldwide consensus guideline is urgently required to standardize the ERAS protocols for elective lung resections in the future. Dove Medical Press 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5695257/ /pubmed/29180901 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150500 Text en © 2017 Li et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Li, Shuangjiang Zhou, Kun Che, Guowei Yang, Mei Su, Jianhua Shen, Cheng Yu, Pengming Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180901 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150500 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lishuangjiang enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhoukun enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cheguowei enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yangmei enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sujianhua enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shencheng enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yupengming enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |