Cargando…

Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an effective evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol of perioperative care, but its roles in thoracic surgery remain unclear. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shuangjiang, Zhou, Kun, Che, Guowei, Yang, Mei, Su, Jianhua, Shen, Cheng, Yu, Pengming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180901
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150500
_version_ 1783280279606001664
author Li, Shuangjiang
Zhou, Kun
Che, Guowei
Yang, Mei
Su, Jianhua
Shen, Cheng
Yu, Pengming
author_facet Li, Shuangjiang
Zhou, Kun
Che, Guowei
Yang, Mei
Su, Jianhua
Shen, Cheng
Yu, Pengming
author_sort Li, Shuangjiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an effective evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol of perioperative care, but its roles in thoracic surgery remain unclear. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of the ERAS programs for lung cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify the RCTs that implemented an ERAS program encompassing more than four care elements within at least two phases of perioperative care in lung cancer surgery. The heterogeneity levels between studies were estimated by the Cochrane Collaborations. A qualitative review was performed if considerable heterogeneity was revealed. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference served as the summarized statistics for the meta-analyses. Additional analyses were also performed to perceive potential bias risks. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs enrolling 486 patients were included. The meta-analysis indicated that the ERAS group patients had significantly lower morbidity rates (RR=0.64; p<0.001), especially the rates of pulmonary (RR=0.43; p<0.001) and surgical complications (RR=0.46; p=0.010), than those of control group patients. No significant reduction was found in the in-hospital mortality (RR=0.70; p=0.58) or cardiovascular complications (RR=1.46; p=0.25). In the qualitative review, most of the evidence reported significantly shortened length of hospital and intensive care unit stay and decreased hospitalization costs in the ERAS-treated patients. No significant publication bias was detected in the meta-analyses. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrates that the implementation of an ERAS program for lung cancer surgery can effectively accelerate postoperative recovery and save hospitalization costs without compromising patients’ safety. A worldwide consensus guideline is urgently required to standardize the ERAS protocols for elective lung resections in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56952572017-11-27 Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Li, Shuangjiang Zhou, Kun Che, Guowei Yang, Mei Su, Jianhua Shen, Cheng Yu, Pengming Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an effective evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol of perioperative care, but its roles in thoracic surgery remain unclear. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of the ERAS programs for lung cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify the RCTs that implemented an ERAS program encompassing more than four care elements within at least two phases of perioperative care in lung cancer surgery. The heterogeneity levels between studies were estimated by the Cochrane Collaborations. A qualitative review was performed if considerable heterogeneity was revealed. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference served as the summarized statistics for the meta-analyses. Additional analyses were also performed to perceive potential bias risks. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs enrolling 486 patients were included. The meta-analysis indicated that the ERAS group patients had significantly lower morbidity rates (RR=0.64; p<0.001), especially the rates of pulmonary (RR=0.43; p<0.001) and surgical complications (RR=0.46; p=0.010), than those of control group patients. No significant reduction was found in the in-hospital mortality (RR=0.70; p=0.58) or cardiovascular complications (RR=1.46; p=0.25). In the qualitative review, most of the evidence reported significantly shortened length of hospital and intensive care unit stay and decreased hospitalization costs in the ERAS-treated patients. No significant publication bias was detected in the meta-analyses. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrates that the implementation of an ERAS program for lung cancer surgery can effectively accelerate postoperative recovery and save hospitalization costs without compromising patients’ safety. A worldwide consensus guideline is urgently required to standardize the ERAS protocols for elective lung resections in the future. Dove Medical Press 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5695257/ /pubmed/29180901 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150500 Text en © 2017 Li et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Shuangjiang
Zhou, Kun
Che, Guowei
Yang, Mei
Su, Jianhua
Shen, Cheng
Yu, Pengming
Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180901
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150500
work_keys_str_mv AT lishuangjiang enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhoukun enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cheguowei enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangmei enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sujianhua enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shencheng enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yupengming enhancedrecoveryprogramsinlungcancersurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials