Cargando…

Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them

AIM: To assess the quality of routine oral surgery referrals received at Halmstad Hospital and Växjö Hospital and to emphasize areas for improvement. METHOD: A retrospective study was performed on all routine oral surgery referrals received between 2014 and 2015 at both Halmstad Hospital and Växjö H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Björkeborn, Mikael, Nilsson, Henrik, Anderud, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180904
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S138201
_version_ 1783280281124339712
author Björkeborn, Mikael
Nilsson, Henrik
Anderud, Jonas
author_facet Björkeborn, Mikael
Nilsson, Henrik
Anderud, Jonas
author_sort Björkeborn, Mikael
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess the quality of routine oral surgery referrals received at Halmstad Hospital and Växjö Hospital and to emphasize areas for improvement. METHOD: A retrospective study was performed on all routine oral surgery referrals received between 2014 and 2015 at both Halmstad Hospital and Växjö Hospital. A total of 1,891 referral letters were assessed for their quality against a predetermined checklist of basic requirements of a satisfactory referral. The referrals were also categorized according to if it was sent by a male, female, private dental service, or the Swedish Public Dental Health service. RESULTS: A diagnosis was missing in 30% of all referrals. Radiographs and information about previous radiographic examinations were not included in 10% of the referrals. Of those referrals that included radiographs, only around half were deemed adequate for diagnostic purposes. The presenting complaint was missing in 40% of all referrals. Current medical history was absent in 40% and current medication was omitted in 60% of the referrals. Information about tobacco use was only included in 10% of all referrals. Overall, female referrers performed better than male colleagues. Private referrals more regularly included information about diagnosis, previous treatment, and current medication. On the other hand, referrals from the public dental health service more frequently included radiographs, tobacco use, and current medical history. CONCLUSION: There is plenty of room for improving the standards of oral surgery referrals. We suggest that future electronic referral systems should only allow for submission once all of the essential information has been considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56952632017-11-27 Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them Björkeborn, Mikael Nilsson, Henrik Anderud, Jonas Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Original Research AIM: To assess the quality of routine oral surgery referrals received at Halmstad Hospital and Växjö Hospital and to emphasize areas for improvement. METHOD: A retrospective study was performed on all routine oral surgery referrals received between 2014 and 2015 at both Halmstad Hospital and Växjö Hospital. A total of 1,891 referral letters were assessed for their quality against a predetermined checklist of basic requirements of a satisfactory referral. The referrals were also categorized according to if it was sent by a male, female, private dental service, or the Swedish Public Dental Health service. RESULTS: A diagnosis was missing in 30% of all referrals. Radiographs and information about previous radiographic examinations were not included in 10% of the referrals. Of those referrals that included radiographs, only around half were deemed adequate for diagnostic purposes. The presenting complaint was missing in 40% of all referrals. Current medical history was absent in 40% and current medication was omitted in 60% of the referrals. Information about tobacco use was only included in 10% of all referrals. Overall, female referrers performed better than male colleagues. Private referrals more regularly included information about diagnosis, previous treatment, and current medication. On the other hand, referrals from the public dental health service more frequently included radiographs, tobacco use, and current medical history. CONCLUSION: There is plenty of room for improving the standards of oral surgery referrals. We suggest that future electronic referral systems should only allow for submission once all of the essential information has been considered. Dove Medical Press 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5695263/ /pubmed/29180904 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S138201 Text en © 2017 Björkeborn et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Björkeborn, Mikael
Nilsson, Henrik
Anderud, Jonas
Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
title Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
title_full Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
title_fullStr Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
title_full_unstemmed Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
title_short Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
title_sort quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180904
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S138201
work_keys_str_mv AT bjorkebornmikael qualityoforalsurgeryreferralsandhowtoimprovethem
AT nilssonhenrik qualityoforalsurgeryreferralsandhowtoimprovethem
AT anderudjonas qualityoforalsurgeryreferralsandhowtoimprovethem