Cargando…
Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study
OBJECTIVES: Evidence from the US Truth campaign suggests that interventions focusing on tobacco industry practices and ethics may be effective in preventing youth smoking uptake. We developed, piloted and evaluated a school-based intervention based on this premise. METHODS: Exploratory study student...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018031 |
_version_ | 1783280290792210432 |
---|---|
author | Szatkowski, Lisa Taylor, John Taylor, Amy Lewis, Sarah Wu, Qi Parrott, Steve McNeill, Ann Britton, John Bauld, Linda Jones, Laura L Bains, Manpreet |
author_facet | Szatkowski, Lisa Taylor, John Taylor, Amy Lewis, Sarah Wu, Qi Parrott, Steve McNeill, Ann Britton, John Bauld, Linda Jones, Laura L Bains, Manpreet |
author_sort | Szatkowski, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Evidence from the US Truth campaign suggests that interventions focusing on tobacco industry practices and ethics may be effective in preventing youth smoking uptake. We developed, piloted and evaluated a school-based intervention based on this premise. METHODS: Exploratory study students in years 7–8 (aged 11–13) in two UK schools received Operation Smoke Storm, comprising three 50 min classroom-based sessions in year 7, an accompanying family booklet and a 1-hour classroom-based booster session in year 8. We compared the risk and odds of ever smoking and susceptibility to smoking in year 8 students in study schools postintervention with students in control schools. Focus groups and interviews with students, teachers and parents evaluated the acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS: In intervention schools, the combined prevalence of ever smoking and susceptibility increased from 18.2% in year 7 to 33.8% in year 8. There was no significant difference in the odds of a year 8 student in an intervention school being an ever smoker or susceptible never smoker compared with controls (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.97, p=0.263) and no significant difference in the odds of ever smoking (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.58, p=0.549). Teachers highlighted differences by academic ability in how well the messages presented were understood. Use of the family component was low but was received positively by parents who engaged with it. CONCLUSIONS: Operation Smoke Storm is an acceptable resource for delivering smoking-prevention education, but it does not appear to have reduced smoking and susceptibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5695312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56953122017-11-24 Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study Szatkowski, Lisa Taylor, John Taylor, Amy Lewis, Sarah Wu, Qi Parrott, Steve McNeill, Ann Britton, John Bauld, Linda Jones, Laura L Bains, Manpreet BMJ Open Addiction OBJECTIVES: Evidence from the US Truth campaign suggests that interventions focusing on tobacco industry practices and ethics may be effective in preventing youth smoking uptake. We developed, piloted and evaluated a school-based intervention based on this premise. METHODS: Exploratory study students in years 7–8 (aged 11–13) in two UK schools received Operation Smoke Storm, comprising three 50 min classroom-based sessions in year 7, an accompanying family booklet and a 1-hour classroom-based booster session in year 8. We compared the risk and odds of ever smoking and susceptibility to smoking in year 8 students in study schools postintervention with students in control schools. Focus groups and interviews with students, teachers and parents evaluated the acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS: In intervention schools, the combined prevalence of ever smoking and susceptibility increased from 18.2% in year 7 to 33.8% in year 8. There was no significant difference in the odds of a year 8 student in an intervention school being an ever smoker or susceptible never smoker compared with controls (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.97, p=0.263) and no significant difference in the odds of ever smoking (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.58, p=0.549). Teachers highlighted differences by academic ability in how well the messages presented were understood. Use of the family component was low but was received positively by parents who engaged with it. CONCLUSIONS: Operation Smoke Storm is an acceptable resource for delivering smoking-prevention education, but it does not appear to have reduced smoking and susceptibility. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5695312/ /pubmed/29101143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018031 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Addiction Szatkowski, Lisa Taylor, John Taylor, Amy Lewis, Sarah Wu, Qi Parrott, Steve McNeill, Ann Britton, John Bauld, Linda Jones, Laura L Bains, Manpreet Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study |
title | Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study |
title_full | Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study |
title_short | Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study |
topic | Addiction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szatkowskilisa evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT taylorjohn evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT tayloramy evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT lewissarah evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT wuqi evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT parrottsteve evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT mcneillann evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT brittonjohn evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT bauldlinda evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT joneslaural evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy AT bainsmanpreet evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy |