Cargando…

Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES: Evidence from the US Truth campaign suggests that interventions focusing on tobacco industry practices and ethics may be effective in preventing youth smoking uptake. We developed, piloted and evaluated a school-based intervention based on this premise. METHODS: Exploratory study student...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szatkowski, Lisa, Taylor, John, Taylor, Amy, Lewis, Sarah, Wu, Qi, Parrott, Steve, McNeill, Ann, Britton, John, Bauld, Linda, Jones, Laura L, Bains, Manpreet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018031
_version_ 1783280290792210432
author Szatkowski, Lisa
Taylor, John
Taylor, Amy
Lewis, Sarah
Wu, Qi
Parrott, Steve
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
Bauld, Linda
Jones, Laura L
Bains, Manpreet
author_facet Szatkowski, Lisa
Taylor, John
Taylor, Amy
Lewis, Sarah
Wu, Qi
Parrott, Steve
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
Bauld, Linda
Jones, Laura L
Bains, Manpreet
author_sort Szatkowski, Lisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evidence from the US Truth campaign suggests that interventions focusing on tobacco industry practices and ethics may be effective in preventing youth smoking uptake. We developed, piloted and evaluated a school-based intervention based on this premise. METHODS: Exploratory study students in years 7–8 (aged 11–13) in two UK schools received Operation Smoke Storm, comprising three 50 min classroom-based sessions in year 7, an accompanying family booklet and a 1-hour classroom-based booster session in year 8. We compared the risk and odds of ever smoking and susceptibility to smoking in year 8 students in study schools postintervention with students in control schools. Focus groups and interviews with students, teachers and parents evaluated the acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS: In intervention schools, the combined prevalence of ever smoking and susceptibility increased from 18.2% in year 7 to 33.8% in year 8. There was no significant difference in the odds of a year 8 student in an intervention school being an ever smoker or susceptible never smoker compared with controls (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.97, p=0.263) and no significant difference in the odds of ever smoking (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.58, p=0.549). Teachers highlighted differences by academic ability in how well the messages presented were understood. Use of the family component was low but was received positively by parents who engaged with it. CONCLUSIONS: Operation Smoke Storm is an acceptable resource for delivering smoking-prevention education, but it does not appear to have reduced smoking and susceptibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56953122017-11-24 Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study Szatkowski, Lisa Taylor, John Taylor, Amy Lewis, Sarah Wu, Qi Parrott, Steve McNeill, Ann Britton, John Bauld, Linda Jones, Laura L Bains, Manpreet BMJ Open Addiction OBJECTIVES: Evidence from the US Truth campaign suggests that interventions focusing on tobacco industry practices and ethics may be effective in preventing youth smoking uptake. We developed, piloted and evaluated a school-based intervention based on this premise. METHODS: Exploratory study students in years 7–8 (aged 11–13) in two UK schools received Operation Smoke Storm, comprising three 50 min classroom-based sessions in year 7, an accompanying family booklet and a 1-hour classroom-based booster session in year 8. We compared the risk and odds of ever smoking and susceptibility to smoking in year 8 students in study schools postintervention with students in control schools. Focus groups and interviews with students, teachers and parents evaluated the acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS: In intervention schools, the combined prevalence of ever smoking and susceptibility increased from 18.2% in year 7 to 33.8% in year 8. There was no significant difference in the odds of a year 8 student in an intervention school being an ever smoker or susceptible never smoker compared with controls (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.97, p=0.263) and no significant difference in the odds of ever smoking (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.58, p=0.549). Teachers highlighted differences by academic ability in how well the messages presented were understood. Use of the family component was low but was received positively by parents who engaged with it. CONCLUSIONS: Operation Smoke Storm is an acceptable resource for delivering smoking-prevention education, but it does not appear to have reduced smoking and susceptibility. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5695312/ /pubmed/29101143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018031 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Addiction
Szatkowski, Lisa
Taylor, John
Taylor, Amy
Lewis, Sarah
Wu, Qi
Parrott, Steve
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
Bauld, Linda
Jones, Laura L
Bains, Manpreet
Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study
title Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study
title_full Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study
title_short Evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study
title_sort evaluation of a novel intervention providing insight into the tobacco industry to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children: a mixed-methods study
topic Addiction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018031
work_keys_str_mv AT szatkowskilisa evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT taylorjohn evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT tayloramy evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT lewissarah evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT wuqi evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT parrottsteve evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT mcneillann evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT brittonjohn evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT bauldlinda evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT joneslaural evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy
AT bainsmanpreet evaluationofanovelinterventionprovidinginsightintothetobaccoindustrytopreventtheuptakeofsmokinginschoolagedchildrenamixedmethodsstudy