Cargando…

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial)

INTRODUCTION: Patients with symptomatic spondylolisthesis are frequently treated with nerve root decompression, in addition to pedicle screw fixation and interbody fusion. Minimally invasive approaches are gaining attention in recent years, although there is no clear evidence supporting the proclama...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arts, Mark P, Wolfs, Jasper FC, Kuijlen, Jos MA, de Ruiter, Godard CW
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017882
_version_ 1783280292667064320
author Arts, Mark P
Wolfs, Jasper FC
Kuijlen, Jos MA
de Ruiter, Godard CW
author_facet Arts, Mark P
Wolfs, Jasper FC
Kuijlen, Jos MA
de Ruiter, Godard CW
author_sort Arts, Mark P
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with symptomatic spondylolisthesis are frequently treated with nerve root decompression, in addition to pedicle screw fixation and interbody fusion. Minimally invasive approaches are gaining attention in recent years, although there is no clear evidence supporting the proclamation of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) being better than open surgery. We present the design of the MISOS (Minimal Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery) trial on the effectiveness of MISS versus open surgery in patients with degenerative or spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All patients (age 18–75 years) with neurogenic claudication or radicular leg pain based on low-grade degenerative or spondylolytic spondylolisthesis with persistent complaints for at least 3 months are eligible. Patients will be randomised into mini-open decompression with bilateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MISS), or conventional surgery with decompression and instrumented fusion with pedicle screws and bilateral interbody fusion (open). The primary outcome measure is Visual Analogue Scale of self-reported low back pain. Secondary outcome measures include improvement of leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, patients’ perceived recovery, quality of life, resumption of work, complications, blood loss, length of hospital stay, incidence of reoperations and documentation of fusion. This study is designed as a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in which two surgical techniques are compared in a parallel group design. Based on a 20 mm difference of low back pain score at 6 weeks (power of 90%, assuming 8% loss to follow-up), a total of 184 patients will be needed. All analyses will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Medical Ethical Review Board Southwest Holland in August 2014 (registration number NL 49044.098.14) and subsequently approved by the board of all participating hospitals. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR 4532, pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56953192017-11-24 Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial) Arts, Mark P Wolfs, Jasper FC Kuijlen, Jos MA de Ruiter, Godard CW BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Patients with symptomatic spondylolisthesis are frequently treated with nerve root decompression, in addition to pedicle screw fixation and interbody fusion. Minimally invasive approaches are gaining attention in recent years, although there is no clear evidence supporting the proclamation of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) being better than open surgery. We present the design of the MISOS (Minimal Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery) trial on the effectiveness of MISS versus open surgery in patients with degenerative or spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All patients (age 18–75 years) with neurogenic claudication or radicular leg pain based on low-grade degenerative or spondylolytic spondylolisthesis with persistent complaints for at least 3 months are eligible. Patients will be randomised into mini-open decompression with bilateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MISS), or conventional surgery with decompression and instrumented fusion with pedicle screws and bilateral interbody fusion (open). The primary outcome measure is Visual Analogue Scale of self-reported low back pain. Secondary outcome measures include improvement of leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, patients’ perceived recovery, quality of life, resumption of work, complications, blood loss, length of hospital stay, incidence of reoperations and documentation of fusion. This study is designed as a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in which two surgical techniques are compared in a parallel group design. Based on a 20 mm difference of low back pain score at 6 weeks (power of 90%, assuming 8% loss to follow-up), a total of 184 patients will be needed. All analyses will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Medical Ethical Review Board Southwest Holland in August 2014 (registration number NL 49044.098.14) and subsequently approved by the board of all participating hospitals. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR 4532, pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5695319/ /pubmed/29133325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017882 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
Arts, Mark P
Wolfs, Jasper FC
Kuijlen, Jos MA
de Ruiter, Godard CW
Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial)
title Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial)
title_full Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial)
title_fullStr Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial)
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial)
title_short Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial)
title_sort minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial (misos trial)
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017882
work_keys_str_mv AT artsmarkp minimallyinvasivesurgeryversusopensurgeryinthetreatmentoflumbarspondylolisthesisstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmisostrial
AT wolfsjasperfc minimallyinvasivesurgeryversusopensurgeryinthetreatmentoflumbarspondylolisthesisstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmisostrial
AT kuijlenjosma minimallyinvasivesurgeryversusopensurgeryinthetreatmentoflumbarspondylolisthesisstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmisostrial
AT deruitergodardcw minimallyinvasivesurgeryversusopensurgeryinthetreatmentoflumbarspondylolisthesisstudyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialmisostrial