Cargando…
Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To synthesise data concerning the views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals towards the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check programme in general and the challenges faced when implementing it in practice. DESIGN: A systematic review of surveys and interview studi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29146658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018606 |
_version_ | 1783280293863489536 |
---|---|
author | Mills, Katie Harte, Emma Martin, Adam MacLure, Calum Griffin, Simon J Mant, Jonathan Meads, Catherine Saunders, Catherine L Walter, Fiona M Usher-Smith, Juliet A |
author_facet | Mills, Katie Harte, Emma Martin, Adam MacLure, Calum Griffin, Simon J Mant, Jonathan Meads, Catherine Saunders, Catherine L Walter, Fiona M Usher-Smith, Juliet A |
author_sort | Mills, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To synthesise data concerning the views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals towards the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check programme in general and the challenges faced when implementing it in practice. DESIGN: A systematic review of surveys and interview studies with a descriptive analysis of quantitative data and thematic synthesis of qualitative data. DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Health Management Information Consortium, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Global Health, PsycInfo, Web of Science, OpenGrey, the Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, Google Scholar, Google, ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry from 1 January 1996 to 9 November 2016 with no language restriction and manual screening of reference lists of all included papers. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Primary research reporting views of commissioners, managers or healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme and its implementation in practice. RESULTS: Of 18 524 citations, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was evidence from both quantitative and qualitative studies that some commissioners and general practice (GP) healthcare professionals were enthusiastic about the programme, whereas others raised concerns around inequality of uptake, the evidence base and cost-effectiveness. In contrast, those working in pharmacies were all positive about programme benefits, citing opportunities for their business and staff. The main challenges to implementation were: difficulties with information technology and computer software, resistance to the programme from some GPs, the impact on workload and staffing, funding and training needs. Inadequate privacy was also a challenge in pharmacy and community settings, along with difficulty recruiting people eligible for Health Checks and poor public access to some venues. CONCLUSIONS: The success of the NHS Health Check Programme relies on engagement by those responsible for its commissioning, management and delivery. Recognising and addressing the challenges identified in this review, in particular the concerns of GPs, are important for the future of the programme. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5695333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56953332017-11-24 Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review Mills, Katie Harte, Emma Martin, Adam MacLure, Calum Griffin, Simon J Mant, Jonathan Meads, Catherine Saunders, Catherine L Walter, Fiona M Usher-Smith, Juliet A BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To synthesise data concerning the views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals towards the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check programme in general and the challenges faced when implementing it in practice. DESIGN: A systematic review of surveys and interview studies with a descriptive analysis of quantitative data and thematic synthesis of qualitative data. DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Health Management Information Consortium, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Global Health, PsycInfo, Web of Science, OpenGrey, the Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence, Google Scholar, Google, ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry from 1 January 1996 to 9 November 2016 with no language restriction and manual screening of reference lists of all included papers. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Primary research reporting views of commissioners, managers or healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme and its implementation in practice. RESULTS: Of 18 524 citations, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was evidence from both quantitative and qualitative studies that some commissioners and general practice (GP) healthcare professionals were enthusiastic about the programme, whereas others raised concerns around inequality of uptake, the evidence base and cost-effectiveness. In contrast, those working in pharmacies were all positive about programme benefits, citing opportunities for their business and staff. The main challenges to implementation were: difficulties with information technology and computer software, resistance to the programme from some GPs, the impact on workload and staffing, funding and training needs. Inadequate privacy was also a challenge in pharmacy and community settings, along with difficulty recruiting people eligible for Health Checks and poor public access to some venues. CONCLUSIONS: The success of the NHS Health Check Programme relies on engagement by those responsible for its commissioning, management and delivery. Recognising and addressing the challenges identified in this review, in particular the concerns of GPs, are important for the future of the programme. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5695333/ /pubmed/29146658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018606 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Mills, Katie Harte, Emma Martin, Adam MacLure, Calum Griffin, Simon J Mant, Jonathan Meads, Catherine Saunders, Catherine L Walter, Fiona M Usher-Smith, Juliet A Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review |
title | Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review |
title_full | Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review |
title_short | Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review |
title_sort | views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the nhs health check programme: a systematic review |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29146658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millskatie viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT harteemma viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT martinadam viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT maclurecalum viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT griffinsimonj viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT mantjonathan viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT meadscatherine viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT saunderscatherinel viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT walterfionam viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview AT ushersmithjulieta viewsofcommissionersmanagersandhealthcareprofessionalsonthenhshealthcheckprogrammeasystematicreview |