Cargando…

Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017)

OBJECTIVE: Digital innovations with internet/mobile phones offer a potential cost-saving solution for overburdened health systems with high service delivery costs to improve efficiency of HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infections) control initiatives. However, their overall evidence has not yet been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daher, Jana, Vijh, Rohit, Linthwaite, Blake, Dave, Sailly, Kim, John, Dheda, Keertan, Peter, Trevor, Pai, Nitika Pant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017604
_version_ 1783280298486661120
author Daher, Jana
Vijh, Rohit
Linthwaite, Blake
Dave, Sailly
Kim, John
Dheda, Keertan
Peter, Trevor
Pai, Nitika Pant
author_facet Daher, Jana
Vijh, Rohit
Linthwaite, Blake
Dave, Sailly
Kim, John
Dheda, Keertan
Peter, Trevor
Pai, Nitika Pant
author_sort Daher, Jana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Digital innovations with internet/mobile phones offer a potential cost-saving solution for overburdened health systems with high service delivery costs to improve efficiency of HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infections) control initiatives. However, their overall evidence has not yet been appraised. We evaluated the feasibility and impact of all digital innovations for all HIV/STIs. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All settings/all participants. INTERVENTION: We classified digital innovations into (1) mobile health-based (mHealth: SMS (short message service)/phone calls), (2) internet-based mobile and/or electronic health (mHealth/eHealth: social media, avatar-guided computer programs, websites, mobile applications, streamed soap opera videos) and (3) combined innovations (included both SMS/phone calls and internet-based mHealth/eHealth). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, acceptability, impact. METHODS: We searched databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science, abstracted data, explored heterogeneity, performed a random effects subgroup analysis. RESULTS: We reviewed 99 studies, 63 (64%) were from America/Europe, 36 (36%) from Africa/Asia; 79% (79/99) were clinical trials; 84% (83/99) evaluated impact. Of innovations, mHealth based: 70% (69/99); internet based: 21% (21/99); combined: 9% (9/99). All digital innovations were highly accepted (26/31; 84%), and feasible (20/31; 65%). Regarding impacted measures, mHealth-based innovations (SMS) significantly improved antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence (pooled OR=2.15(95%CI: 1.18 to 3.91)) and clinic attendance rates (pooled OR=1.76(95%CI: 1.28, 2.42)); internet-based innovations improved clinic attendance (6/6), ART adherence (4/4), self-care (1/1), while reducing risk (5/5); combined innovations increased clinic attendance, ART adherence, partner notifications and self-care. Confounding (68%) and selection bias (66%) were observed in observational studies and attrition bias in 31% of clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Digital innovations were acceptable, feasible and generated impact. A trend towards the use of internet-based and combined (internet and mobile) innovations was noted. Large scale-up studies of high quality, with new integrated impact metrics, and cost-effectiveness are needed. Findings will appeal to all stakeholders in the HIV/STI global initiatives space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56953532017-11-24 Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017) Daher, Jana Vijh, Rohit Linthwaite, Blake Dave, Sailly Kim, John Dheda, Keertan Peter, Trevor Pai, Nitika Pant BMJ Open HIV/AIDS OBJECTIVE: Digital innovations with internet/mobile phones offer a potential cost-saving solution for overburdened health systems with high service delivery costs to improve efficiency of HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infections) control initiatives. However, their overall evidence has not yet been appraised. We evaluated the feasibility and impact of all digital innovations for all HIV/STIs. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All settings/all participants. INTERVENTION: We classified digital innovations into (1) mobile health-based (mHealth: SMS (short message service)/phone calls), (2) internet-based mobile and/or electronic health (mHealth/eHealth: social media, avatar-guided computer programs, websites, mobile applications, streamed soap opera videos) and (3) combined innovations (included both SMS/phone calls and internet-based mHealth/eHealth). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, acceptability, impact. METHODS: We searched databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science, abstracted data, explored heterogeneity, performed a random effects subgroup analysis. RESULTS: We reviewed 99 studies, 63 (64%) were from America/Europe, 36 (36%) from Africa/Asia; 79% (79/99) were clinical trials; 84% (83/99) evaluated impact. Of innovations, mHealth based: 70% (69/99); internet based: 21% (21/99); combined: 9% (9/99). All digital innovations were highly accepted (26/31; 84%), and feasible (20/31; 65%). Regarding impacted measures, mHealth-based innovations (SMS) significantly improved antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence (pooled OR=2.15(95%CI: 1.18 to 3.91)) and clinic attendance rates (pooled OR=1.76(95%CI: 1.28, 2.42)); internet-based innovations improved clinic attendance (6/6), ART adherence (4/4), self-care (1/1), while reducing risk (5/5); combined innovations increased clinic attendance, ART adherence, partner notifications and self-care. Confounding (68%) and selection bias (66%) were observed in observational studies and attrition bias in 31% of clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Digital innovations were acceptable, feasible and generated impact. A trend towards the use of internet-based and combined (internet and mobile) innovations was noted. Large scale-up studies of high quality, with new integrated impact metrics, and cost-effectiveness are needed. Findings will appeal to all stakeholders in the HIV/STI global initiatives space. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5695353/ /pubmed/29101138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017604 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS
Daher, Jana
Vijh, Rohit
Linthwaite, Blake
Dave, Sailly
Kim, John
Dheda, Keertan
Peter, Trevor
Pai, Nitika Pant
Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017)
title Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017)
title_full Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017)
title_fullStr Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017)
title_full_unstemmed Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017)
title_short Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017)
title_sort do digital innovations for hiv and sexually transmitted infections work? results from a systematic review (1996-2017)
topic HIV/AIDS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017604
work_keys_str_mv AT daherjana dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017
AT vijhrohit dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017
AT linthwaiteblake dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017
AT davesailly dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017
AT kimjohn dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017
AT dhedakeertan dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017
AT petertrevor dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017
AT painitikapant dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017