Cargando…
Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017)
OBJECTIVE: Digital innovations with internet/mobile phones offer a potential cost-saving solution for overburdened health systems with high service delivery costs to improve efficiency of HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infections) control initiatives. However, their overall evidence has not yet been...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017604 |
_version_ | 1783280298486661120 |
---|---|
author | Daher, Jana Vijh, Rohit Linthwaite, Blake Dave, Sailly Kim, John Dheda, Keertan Peter, Trevor Pai, Nitika Pant |
author_facet | Daher, Jana Vijh, Rohit Linthwaite, Blake Dave, Sailly Kim, John Dheda, Keertan Peter, Trevor Pai, Nitika Pant |
author_sort | Daher, Jana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Digital innovations with internet/mobile phones offer a potential cost-saving solution for overburdened health systems with high service delivery costs to improve efficiency of HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infections) control initiatives. However, their overall evidence has not yet been appraised. We evaluated the feasibility and impact of all digital innovations for all HIV/STIs. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All settings/all participants. INTERVENTION: We classified digital innovations into (1) mobile health-based (mHealth: SMS (short message service)/phone calls), (2) internet-based mobile and/or electronic health (mHealth/eHealth: social media, avatar-guided computer programs, websites, mobile applications, streamed soap opera videos) and (3) combined innovations (included both SMS/phone calls and internet-based mHealth/eHealth). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, acceptability, impact. METHODS: We searched databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science, abstracted data, explored heterogeneity, performed a random effects subgroup analysis. RESULTS: We reviewed 99 studies, 63 (64%) were from America/Europe, 36 (36%) from Africa/Asia; 79% (79/99) were clinical trials; 84% (83/99) evaluated impact. Of innovations, mHealth based: 70% (69/99); internet based: 21% (21/99); combined: 9% (9/99). All digital innovations were highly accepted (26/31; 84%), and feasible (20/31; 65%). Regarding impacted measures, mHealth-based innovations (SMS) significantly improved antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence (pooled OR=2.15(95%CI: 1.18 to 3.91)) and clinic attendance rates (pooled OR=1.76(95%CI: 1.28, 2.42)); internet-based innovations improved clinic attendance (6/6), ART adherence (4/4), self-care (1/1), while reducing risk (5/5); combined innovations increased clinic attendance, ART adherence, partner notifications and self-care. Confounding (68%) and selection bias (66%) were observed in observational studies and attrition bias in 31% of clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Digital innovations were acceptable, feasible and generated impact. A trend towards the use of internet-based and combined (internet and mobile) innovations was noted. Large scale-up studies of high quality, with new integrated impact metrics, and cost-effectiveness are needed. Findings will appeal to all stakeholders in the HIV/STI global initiatives space. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5695353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56953532017-11-24 Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017) Daher, Jana Vijh, Rohit Linthwaite, Blake Dave, Sailly Kim, John Dheda, Keertan Peter, Trevor Pai, Nitika Pant BMJ Open HIV/AIDS OBJECTIVE: Digital innovations with internet/mobile phones offer a potential cost-saving solution for overburdened health systems with high service delivery costs to improve efficiency of HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infections) control initiatives. However, their overall evidence has not yet been appraised. We evaluated the feasibility and impact of all digital innovations for all HIV/STIs. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All settings/all participants. INTERVENTION: We classified digital innovations into (1) mobile health-based (mHealth: SMS (short message service)/phone calls), (2) internet-based mobile and/or electronic health (mHealth/eHealth: social media, avatar-guided computer programs, websites, mobile applications, streamed soap opera videos) and (3) combined innovations (included both SMS/phone calls and internet-based mHealth/eHealth). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, acceptability, impact. METHODS: We searched databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science, abstracted data, explored heterogeneity, performed a random effects subgroup analysis. RESULTS: We reviewed 99 studies, 63 (64%) were from America/Europe, 36 (36%) from Africa/Asia; 79% (79/99) were clinical trials; 84% (83/99) evaluated impact. Of innovations, mHealth based: 70% (69/99); internet based: 21% (21/99); combined: 9% (9/99). All digital innovations were highly accepted (26/31; 84%), and feasible (20/31; 65%). Regarding impacted measures, mHealth-based innovations (SMS) significantly improved antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence (pooled OR=2.15(95%CI: 1.18 to 3.91)) and clinic attendance rates (pooled OR=1.76(95%CI: 1.28, 2.42)); internet-based innovations improved clinic attendance (6/6), ART adherence (4/4), self-care (1/1), while reducing risk (5/5); combined innovations increased clinic attendance, ART adherence, partner notifications and self-care. Confounding (68%) and selection bias (66%) were observed in observational studies and attrition bias in 31% of clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Digital innovations were acceptable, feasible and generated impact. A trend towards the use of internet-based and combined (internet and mobile) innovations was noted. Large scale-up studies of high quality, with new integrated impact metrics, and cost-effectiveness are needed. Findings will appeal to all stakeholders in the HIV/STI global initiatives space. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5695353/ /pubmed/29101138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017604 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | HIV/AIDS Daher, Jana Vijh, Rohit Linthwaite, Blake Dave, Sailly Kim, John Dheda, Keertan Peter, Trevor Pai, Nitika Pant Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017) |
title | Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017) |
title_full | Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017) |
title_fullStr | Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017) |
title_full_unstemmed | Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017) |
title_short | Do digital innovations for HIV and sexually transmitted infections work? Results from a systematic review (1996-2017) |
title_sort | do digital innovations for hiv and sexually transmitted infections work? results from a systematic review (1996-2017) |
topic | HIV/AIDS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29101138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daherjana dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017 AT vijhrohit dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017 AT linthwaiteblake dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017 AT davesailly dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017 AT kimjohn dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017 AT dhedakeertan dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017 AT petertrevor dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017 AT painitikapant dodigitalinnovationsforhivandsexuallytransmittedinfectionsworkresultsfromasystematicreview19962017 |