Cargando…
Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research
OBJECTIVE: To codesign a discussion tool to facilitate negotiation of risk between health professionals, people with dementia and carers. METHODS: A qualitative approach using codesign. Thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews and focus groups with people with dementia, carers, healthcare st...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017672 |
_version_ | 1783280300670844928 |
---|---|
author | Goeman, Dianne Patricia Dickins, Marissa Iliffe, Steve Pond, Dimity O’Keefe, Fleur |
author_facet | Goeman, Dianne Patricia Dickins, Marissa Iliffe, Steve Pond, Dimity O’Keefe, Fleur |
author_sort | Goeman, Dianne Patricia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To codesign a discussion tool to facilitate negotiation of risk between health professionals, people with dementia and carers. METHODS: A qualitative approach using codesign. Thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews and focus groups with people with dementia, carers, healthcare staff and healthy older people exploring the issue of risk in dementia, the acceptability and development of a discussion tool. RESULTS: Sixty-one participants identified the breadth, depth and complexity of risk in dementia care and the need for individualised solutions. They also deemed a discussion tool to facilitate negotiation of risk was acceptable and responses informed the tool development. Twenty-two participants provided feedback that was used to refine the final version. CONCLUSION: Our discussion tool enables choices for people with dementia by focusing on abilities rather than deficits and assists health professionals to deliver person-centred care. Flash cards prompt concerns and the tool provides a range of strategies to address these issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5695371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56953712017-11-24 Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research Goeman, Dianne Patricia Dickins, Marissa Iliffe, Steve Pond, Dimity O’Keefe, Fleur BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To codesign a discussion tool to facilitate negotiation of risk between health professionals, people with dementia and carers. METHODS: A qualitative approach using codesign. Thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews and focus groups with people with dementia, carers, healthcare staff and healthy older people exploring the issue of risk in dementia, the acceptability and development of a discussion tool. RESULTS: Sixty-one participants identified the breadth, depth and complexity of risk in dementia care and the need for individualised solutions. They also deemed a discussion tool to facilitate negotiation of risk was acceptable and responses informed the tool development. Twenty-two participants provided feedback that was used to refine the final version. CONCLUSION: Our discussion tool enables choices for people with dementia by focusing on abilities rather than deficits and assists health professionals to deliver person-centred care. Flash cards prompt concerns and the tool provides a range of strategies to address these issues. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5695371/ /pubmed/29138202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017672 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Goeman, Dianne Patricia Dickins, Marissa Iliffe, Steve Pond, Dimity O’Keefe, Fleur Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research |
title | Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research |
title_full | Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research |
title_fullStr | Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research |
title_short | Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research |
title_sort | development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goemandiannepatricia developmentofadiscussiontooltoenablewellbeingbyprovidingchoicesforpeoplewithdementiaaqualitativestudyincorporatingcodesignandparticipatoryactionresearch AT dickinsmarissa developmentofadiscussiontooltoenablewellbeingbyprovidingchoicesforpeoplewithdementiaaqualitativestudyincorporatingcodesignandparticipatoryactionresearch AT iliffesteve developmentofadiscussiontooltoenablewellbeingbyprovidingchoicesforpeoplewithdementiaaqualitativestudyincorporatingcodesignandparticipatoryactionresearch AT ponddimity developmentofadiscussiontooltoenablewellbeingbyprovidingchoicesforpeoplewithdementiaaqualitativestudyincorporatingcodesignandparticipatoryactionresearch AT okeefefleur developmentofadiscussiontooltoenablewellbeingbyprovidingchoicesforpeoplewithdementiaaqualitativestudyincorporatingcodesignandparticipatoryactionresearch |