Cargando…
Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures
OBJECTIVES: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale is among the most used questionnaires for measuring functional recovery after a hindfoot injury. Recently, this instrument was translated and culturally adapted into a Dutch version. In this study, the measureme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314 |
_version_ | 1783280310281043968 |
---|---|
author | De Boer, A Siebe Meuffels, Duncan E Van der Vlies, Cornelis H Den Hoed, P Ted Tuinebreijer, Wim E Verhofstad, Michael H J Van Lieshout, Esther M M |
author_facet | De Boer, A Siebe Meuffels, Duncan E Van der Vlies, Cornelis H Den Hoed, P Ted Tuinebreijer, Wim E Verhofstad, Michael H J Van Lieshout, Esther M M |
author_sort | De Boer, A Siebe |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale is among the most used questionnaires for measuring functional recovery after a hindfoot injury. Recently, this instrument was translated and culturally adapted into a Dutch version. In this study, the measurement properties of the Dutch language version (DLV) were investigated in patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective observational study. SETTING: This multicentre study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 118 patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture were included. Three patients were lost to follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were asked to complete the AOFAS-DLV, the Foot Function Index and the Short Form-36 on three occasions. Descriptive statistics (including floor and ceiling effects), reliability (ie, internal consistency), construct validity, reproducibility (ie, test–retest reliability, agreement and smallest detectable change (SDC)) and responsiveness were determined. RESULTS: Internal consistency was inadequate for the AOFAS-DLV total scale (α=0.585), but adequate for the function subscale (α=0.863). The questionnaire had adequate construct validity (82.4% of predefined hypotheses were confirmed), but inadequate longitudinal validity (70.6%). No floor effects were found, but ceiling effects were present in all AOFAS-DLV (sub)scales, most pronounced from 6 to 24 months after trauma onwards. Responsiveness was only adequate for the pain and alignment subscales, with a SDC of 1.7 points. CONCLUSIONS: The AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale DLV has adequate construct validity and is reliable, making it a suitable instrument for cross-sectional studies investigating functional outcome in patients with a hindfoot fracture. The inadequate longitudinal validity and responsiveness, however, hamper the use of the questionnaire in longitudinal studies and for assessing long-term functional outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5613; Post-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5695419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56954192017-11-24 Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures De Boer, A Siebe Meuffels, Duncan E Van der Vlies, Cornelis H Den Hoed, P Ted Tuinebreijer, Wim E Verhofstad, Michael H J Van Lieshout, Esther M M BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale is among the most used questionnaires for measuring functional recovery after a hindfoot injury. Recently, this instrument was translated and culturally adapted into a Dutch version. In this study, the measurement properties of the Dutch language version (DLV) were investigated in patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective observational study. SETTING: This multicentre study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 118 patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture were included. Three patients were lost to follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were asked to complete the AOFAS-DLV, the Foot Function Index and the Short Form-36 on three occasions. Descriptive statistics (including floor and ceiling effects), reliability (ie, internal consistency), construct validity, reproducibility (ie, test–retest reliability, agreement and smallest detectable change (SDC)) and responsiveness were determined. RESULTS: Internal consistency was inadequate for the AOFAS-DLV total scale (α=0.585), but adequate for the function subscale (α=0.863). The questionnaire had adequate construct validity (82.4% of predefined hypotheses were confirmed), but inadequate longitudinal validity (70.6%). No floor effects were found, but ceiling effects were present in all AOFAS-DLV (sub)scales, most pronounced from 6 to 24 months after trauma onwards. Responsiveness was only adequate for the pain and alignment subscales, with a SDC of 1.7 points. CONCLUSIONS: The AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale DLV has adequate construct validity and is reliable, making it a suitable instrument for cross-sectional studies investigating functional outcome in patients with a hindfoot fracture. The inadequate longitudinal validity and responsiveness, however, hamper the use of the questionnaire in longitudinal studies and for assessing long-term functional outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5613; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5695419/ /pubmed/29138208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Surgery De Boer, A Siebe Meuffels, Duncan E Van der Vlies, Cornelis H Den Hoed, P Ted Tuinebreijer, Wim E Verhofstad, Michael H J Van Lieshout, Esther M M Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures |
title | Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures |
title_full | Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures |
title_fullStr | Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures |
title_short | Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures |
title_sort | validation of the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society ankle-hindfoot scale dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deboerasiebe validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures AT meuffelsduncane validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures AT vandervliescornelish validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures AT denhoedpted validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures AT tuinebreijerwime validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures AT verhofstadmichaelhj validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures AT vanlieshoutesthermm validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures AT validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures |