Cargando…

Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures

OBJECTIVES: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale is among the most used questionnaires for measuring functional recovery after a hindfoot injury. Recently, this instrument was translated and culturally adapted into a Dutch version. In this study, the measureme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Boer, A Siebe, Meuffels, Duncan E, Van der Vlies, Cornelis H, Den Hoed, P Ted, Tuinebreijer, Wim E, Verhofstad, Michael H J, Van Lieshout, Esther M M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314
_version_ 1783280310281043968
author De Boer, A Siebe
Meuffels, Duncan E
Van der Vlies, Cornelis H
Den Hoed, P Ted
Tuinebreijer, Wim E
Verhofstad, Michael H J
Van Lieshout, Esther M M
author_facet De Boer, A Siebe
Meuffels, Duncan E
Van der Vlies, Cornelis H
Den Hoed, P Ted
Tuinebreijer, Wim E
Verhofstad, Michael H J
Van Lieshout, Esther M M
author_sort De Boer, A Siebe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale is among the most used questionnaires for measuring functional recovery after a hindfoot injury. Recently, this instrument was translated and culturally adapted into a Dutch version. In this study, the measurement properties of the Dutch language version (DLV) were investigated in patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective observational study. SETTING: This multicentre study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 118 patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture were included. Three patients were lost to follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were asked to complete the AOFAS-DLV, the Foot Function Index and the Short Form-36 on three occasions. Descriptive statistics (including floor and ceiling effects), reliability (ie, internal consistency), construct validity, reproducibility (ie, test–retest reliability, agreement and smallest detectable change (SDC)) and responsiveness were determined. RESULTS: Internal consistency was inadequate for the AOFAS-DLV total scale (α=0.585), but adequate for the function subscale (α=0.863). The questionnaire had adequate construct validity (82.4% of predefined hypotheses were confirmed), but inadequate longitudinal validity (70.6%). No floor effects were found, but ceiling effects were present in all AOFAS-DLV (sub)scales, most pronounced from 6 to 24 months after trauma onwards. Responsiveness was only adequate for the pain and alignment subscales, with a SDC of 1.7 points. CONCLUSIONS: The AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale DLV has adequate construct validity and is reliable, making it a suitable instrument for cross-sectional studies investigating functional outcome in patients with a hindfoot fracture. The inadequate longitudinal validity and responsiveness, however, hamper the use of the questionnaire in longitudinal studies and for assessing long-term functional outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5613; Post-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56954192017-11-24 Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures De Boer, A Siebe Meuffels, Duncan E Van der Vlies, Cornelis H Den Hoed, P Ted Tuinebreijer, Wim E Verhofstad, Michael H J Van Lieshout, Esther M M BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale is among the most used questionnaires for measuring functional recovery after a hindfoot injury. Recently, this instrument was translated and culturally adapted into a Dutch version. In this study, the measurement properties of the Dutch language version (DLV) were investigated in patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective observational study. SETTING: This multicentre study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 118 patients with a unilateral hindfoot fracture were included. Three patients were lost to follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were asked to complete the AOFAS-DLV, the Foot Function Index and the Short Form-36 on three occasions. Descriptive statistics (including floor and ceiling effects), reliability (ie, internal consistency), construct validity, reproducibility (ie, test–retest reliability, agreement and smallest detectable change (SDC)) and responsiveness were determined. RESULTS: Internal consistency was inadequate for the AOFAS-DLV total scale (α=0.585), but adequate for the function subscale (α=0.863). The questionnaire had adequate construct validity (82.4% of predefined hypotheses were confirmed), but inadequate longitudinal validity (70.6%). No floor effects were found, but ceiling effects were present in all AOFAS-DLV (sub)scales, most pronounced from 6 to 24 months after trauma onwards. Responsiveness was only adequate for the pain and alignment subscales, with a SDC of 1.7 points. CONCLUSIONS: The AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale DLV has adequate construct validity and is reliable, making it a suitable instrument for cross-sectional studies investigating functional outcome in patients with a hindfoot fracture. The inadequate longitudinal validity and responsiveness, however, hamper the use of the questionnaire in longitudinal studies and for assessing long-term functional outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5613; Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5695419/ /pubmed/29138208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Surgery
De Boer, A Siebe
Meuffels, Duncan E
Van der Vlies, Cornelis H
Den Hoed, P Ted
Tuinebreijer, Wim E
Verhofstad, Michael H J
Van Lieshout, Esther M M
Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures
title Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures
title_full Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures
title_fullStr Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures
title_short Validation of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale Dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures
title_sort validation of the american orthopaedic foot and ankle society ankle-hindfoot scale dutch language version in patients with hindfoot fractures
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29138208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018314
work_keys_str_mv AT deboerasiebe validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures
AT meuffelsduncane validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures
AT vandervliescornelish validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures
AT denhoedpted validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures
AT tuinebreijerwime validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures
AT verhofstadmichaelhj validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures
AT vanlieshoutesthermm validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures
AT validationoftheamericanorthopaedicfootandanklesocietyanklehindfootscaledutchlanguageversioninpatientswithhindfootfractures