Cargando…
Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) often suffer from combinations of multiple chronic conditions, mental health problems, drug interactions and social vulnerability, which can lead to healthcare services overuse, underuse or misuse. Typically, PCCNs face interactional issues and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400 |
_version_ | 1783280312698011648 |
---|---|
author | Bujold, Mathieu Pluye, Pierre Légaré, France Haggerty, Jeannie Gore, Genevieve C Sherif, Reem El Poitras, Marie-Ève Beaulieu, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique Bush, Paula L Couturier, Yves Débarges, Béatrice Gagnon, Justin Giguère, Anik Grad, Roland Granikov, Vera Goulet, Serge Hudon, Catherine Kremer, Bernardo Kröger, Edeltraut Kudrina, Irina Lebouché, Bertrand Loignon, Christine Lussier, Marie-Thérèse Martello, Cristiano Nguyen, Quynh Pratt, Rebekah Rihoux, Benoit Rosenberg, Ellen Samson, Isabelle Senn, Nicolas Li Tang, David Tsujimoto, Masashi Vedel, Isabelle Ventelou, Bruno Wensing, Michel |
author_facet | Bujold, Mathieu Pluye, Pierre Légaré, France Haggerty, Jeannie Gore, Genevieve C Sherif, Reem El Poitras, Marie-Ève Beaulieu, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique Bush, Paula L Couturier, Yves Débarges, Béatrice Gagnon, Justin Giguère, Anik Grad, Roland Granikov, Vera Goulet, Serge Hudon, Catherine Kremer, Bernardo Kröger, Edeltraut Kudrina, Irina Lebouché, Bertrand Loignon, Christine Lussier, Marie-Thérèse Martello, Cristiano Nguyen, Quynh Pratt, Rebekah Rihoux, Benoit Rosenberg, Ellen Samson, Isabelle Senn, Nicolas Li Tang, David Tsujimoto, Masashi Vedel, Isabelle Ventelou, Bruno Wensing, Michel |
author_sort | Bujold, Mathieu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) often suffer from combinations of multiple chronic conditions, mental health problems, drug interactions and social vulnerability, which can lead to healthcare services overuse, underuse or misuse. Typically, PCCNs face interactional issues and unmet decisional needs regarding possible options in a cascade of interrelated decisions involving different stakeholders (themselves, their families, their caregivers, their healthcare practitioners). Gaps in knowledge, values clarification and social support in situations where options need to be deliberated hamper effective decision support interventions. This review aims to (1) assess decisional needs of PCCNs from the perspective of stakeholders, (2) build a taxonomy of these decisional needs and (3) prioritise decisional needs with knowledge users (clinicians, patients and managers). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will be based on the interprofessional shared decision making (IP-SDM) model and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Applying a participatory research approach, we will identify potentially relevant studies through a comprehensive literature search; select relevant ones using eligibility criteria inspired from our previous scoping review on PCCNs; appraise quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; conduct a three-step synthesis (sequential exploratory mixed methods design) to build taxonomy of key decisional needs; and integrate these results with those of a parallel PCCNs’ qualitative decisional need assessment (semistructured interviews and focus group with stakeholders). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review, together with the qualitative study (approved by the Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Service Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean ethical committee), will produce a working taxonomy of key decisional needs (ontological contribution), to inform the subsequent user-centred design of a support tool for addressing PCCNs’ decisional needs (practical contribution). We will adapt the IP-SDM model, normally dealing with a single decision, for PCCNs who experience cascade of decisions involving different stakeholders (theoretical contribution). Knowledge users will facilitate dissemination of the results in the Canadian primary care network. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015020558. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5695438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56954382017-11-24 Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol Bujold, Mathieu Pluye, Pierre Légaré, France Haggerty, Jeannie Gore, Genevieve C Sherif, Reem El Poitras, Marie-Ève Beaulieu, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique Bush, Paula L Couturier, Yves Débarges, Béatrice Gagnon, Justin Giguère, Anik Grad, Roland Granikov, Vera Goulet, Serge Hudon, Catherine Kremer, Bernardo Kröger, Edeltraut Kudrina, Irina Lebouché, Bertrand Loignon, Christine Lussier, Marie-Thérèse Martello, Cristiano Nguyen, Quynh Pratt, Rebekah Rihoux, Benoit Rosenberg, Ellen Samson, Isabelle Senn, Nicolas Li Tang, David Tsujimoto, Masashi Vedel, Isabelle Ventelou, Bruno Wensing, Michel BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) often suffer from combinations of multiple chronic conditions, mental health problems, drug interactions and social vulnerability, which can lead to healthcare services overuse, underuse or misuse. Typically, PCCNs face interactional issues and unmet decisional needs regarding possible options in a cascade of interrelated decisions involving different stakeholders (themselves, their families, their caregivers, their healthcare practitioners). Gaps in knowledge, values clarification and social support in situations where options need to be deliberated hamper effective decision support interventions. This review aims to (1) assess decisional needs of PCCNs from the perspective of stakeholders, (2) build a taxonomy of these decisional needs and (3) prioritise decisional needs with knowledge users (clinicians, patients and managers). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will be based on the interprofessional shared decision making (IP-SDM) model and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Applying a participatory research approach, we will identify potentially relevant studies through a comprehensive literature search; select relevant ones using eligibility criteria inspired from our previous scoping review on PCCNs; appraise quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; conduct a three-step synthesis (sequential exploratory mixed methods design) to build taxonomy of key decisional needs; and integrate these results with those of a parallel PCCNs’ qualitative decisional need assessment (semistructured interviews and focus group with stakeholders). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review, together with the qualitative study (approved by the Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Service Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean ethical committee), will produce a working taxonomy of key decisional needs (ontological contribution), to inform the subsequent user-centred design of a support tool for addressing PCCNs’ decisional needs (practical contribution). We will adapt the IP-SDM model, normally dealing with a single decision, for PCCNs who experience cascade of decisions involving different stakeholders (theoretical contribution). Knowledge users will facilitate dissemination of the results in the Canadian primary care network. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015020558. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5695438/ /pubmed/29133314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Bujold, Mathieu Pluye, Pierre Légaré, France Haggerty, Jeannie Gore, Genevieve C Sherif, Reem El Poitras, Marie-Ève Beaulieu, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique Bush, Paula L Couturier, Yves Débarges, Béatrice Gagnon, Justin Giguère, Anik Grad, Roland Granikov, Vera Goulet, Serge Hudon, Catherine Kremer, Bernardo Kröger, Edeltraut Kudrina, Irina Lebouché, Bertrand Loignon, Christine Lussier, Marie-Thérèse Martello, Cristiano Nguyen, Quynh Pratt, Rebekah Rihoux, Benoit Rosenberg, Ellen Samson, Isabelle Senn, Nicolas Li Tang, David Tsujimoto, Masashi Vedel, Isabelle Ventelou, Bruno Wensing, Michel Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol |
title | Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol |
title_full | Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol |
title_fullStr | Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol |
title_short | Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol |
title_sort | decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29133314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bujoldmathieu decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT pluyepierre decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT legarefrance decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT haggertyjeannie decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT goregenevievec decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT sherifreemel decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT poitrasmarieeve decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT beaulieumarieclaude decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT beaulieumariedominique decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT bushpaulal decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT couturieryves decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT debargesbeatrice decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT gagnonjustin decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT giguereanik decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT gradroland decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT granikovvera decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT gouletserge decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT hudoncatherine decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT kremerbernardo decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT krogeredeltraut decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT kudrinairina decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT lebouchebertrand decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT loignonchristine decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT lussiermarietherese decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT martellocristiano decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT nguyenquynh decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT prattrebekah decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT rihouxbenoit decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT rosenbergellen decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT samsonisabelle decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT sennnicolas decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT litangdavid decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT tsujimotomasashi decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT vedelisabelle decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT venteloubruno decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT wensingmichel decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol AT decisionalneedsassessmentofpatientswithcomplexcareneedsinprimarycareaparticipatorysystematicmixedstudiesreviewprotocol |