Cargando…

Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England

OBJECTIVES: BRIGHTLIGHT is a national evaluation of cancer services for teenagers and young adults in England. Following challenges with recruitment, our aim was to understand more fully healthcare professionals’ perspectives of the challenges of recruiting young people to a low-risk observational s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kenten, Charlotte, Martins, Ana, Fern, Lorna A, Gibson, Faith, Lea, Sarah, Ngwenya, Nothando, Whelan, Jeremy S, Taylor, Rachel M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29122799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018291
_version_ 1783280322162458624
author Kenten, Charlotte
Martins, Ana
Fern, Lorna A
Gibson, Faith
Lea, Sarah
Ngwenya, Nothando
Whelan, Jeremy S
Taylor, Rachel M
author_facet Kenten, Charlotte
Martins, Ana
Fern, Lorna A
Gibson, Faith
Lea, Sarah
Ngwenya, Nothando
Whelan, Jeremy S
Taylor, Rachel M
author_sort Kenten, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: BRIGHTLIGHT is a national evaluation of cancer services for teenagers and young adults in England. Following challenges with recruitment, our aim was to understand more fully healthcare professionals’ perspectives of the challenges of recruiting young people to a low-risk observational study, and to provide guidance for future recruitment processes. DESIGN: Qualitative. SETTING: National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews with a convenience sample of 23 healthcare professionals. Participants included principal investigators/other staff recruiting into the BRIGHTLIGHT study. Data were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: The emergent themes were linked to levels of research organisational management, described using the levels of social network analysis: micro-level (the individual; in this case the target population to be recruited—young people with cancer); meso-level (the organisation; refers to place of recruitment and people responsible for recruitment); and macro-level (the large-scale or global structure; refers to the wider research function of the NHS and associated policies). Study-related issues occurred across all three levels, which were influenced by the context of the study. At the meso-level, professionals’ perceptions of young people and communication between professionals generated age/cancer type silos, resulting in recruitment of either children or adults, but not both by the same team, and only in the cancer type the recruiting professional was aligned to. At the macro-level the main barrier was discordant configuration of a research service with a clinical service. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified significant barriers to recruitment mainly at the meso-level and macro-level, which are more challenging for research teams to influence. We suggest that interconnected whole-system changes are required to facilitate the success of interventions designed to improve recruitment. Interventions targeted at study design/management and the micro-level only may be less successful. We offer solutions to be considered by those involved at all levels of research for this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56954862017-11-24 Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England Kenten, Charlotte Martins, Ana Fern, Lorna A Gibson, Faith Lea, Sarah Ngwenya, Nothando Whelan, Jeremy S Taylor, Rachel M BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: BRIGHTLIGHT is a national evaluation of cancer services for teenagers and young adults in England. Following challenges with recruitment, our aim was to understand more fully healthcare professionals’ perspectives of the challenges of recruiting young people to a low-risk observational study, and to provide guidance for future recruitment processes. DESIGN: Qualitative. SETTING: National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews with a convenience sample of 23 healthcare professionals. Participants included principal investigators/other staff recruiting into the BRIGHTLIGHT study. Data were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: The emergent themes were linked to levels of research organisational management, described using the levels of social network analysis: micro-level (the individual; in this case the target population to be recruited—young people with cancer); meso-level (the organisation; refers to place of recruitment and people responsible for recruitment); and macro-level (the large-scale or global structure; refers to the wider research function of the NHS and associated policies). Study-related issues occurred across all three levels, which were influenced by the context of the study. At the meso-level, professionals’ perceptions of young people and communication between professionals generated age/cancer type silos, resulting in recruitment of either children or adults, but not both by the same team, and only in the cancer type the recruiting professional was aligned to. At the macro-level the main barrier was discordant configuration of a research service with a clinical service. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified significant barriers to recruitment mainly at the meso-level and macro-level, which are more challenging for research teams to influence. We suggest that interconnected whole-system changes are required to facilitate the success of interventions designed to improve recruitment. Interventions targeted at study design/management and the micro-level only may be less successful. We offer solutions to be considered by those involved at all levels of research for this population. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5695486/ /pubmed/29122799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018291 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Kenten, Charlotte
Martins, Ana
Fern, Lorna A
Gibson, Faith
Lea, Sarah
Ngwenya, Nothando
Whelan, Jeremy S
Taylor, Rachel M
Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England
title Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England
title_full Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England
title_fullStr Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England
title_short Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England
title_sort qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to brightlight: a national cohort study in england
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29122799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018291
work_keys_str_mv AT kentencharlotte qualitativestudytounderstandthebarrierstorecruitingyoungpeoplewithcancertobrightlightanationalcohortstudyinengland
AT martinsana qualitativestudytounderstandthebarrierstorecruitingyoungpeoplewithcancertobrightlightanationalcohortstudyinengland
AT fernlornaa qualitativestudytounderstandthebarrierstorecruitingyoungpeoplewithcancertobrightlightanationalcohortstudyinengland
AT gibsonfaith qualitativestudytounderstandthebarrierstorecruitingyoungpeoplewithcancertobrightlightanationalcohortstudyinengland
AT leasarah qualitativestudytounderstandthebarrierstorecruitingyoungpeoplewithcancertobrightlightanationalcohortstudyinengland
AT ngwenyanothando qualitativestudytounderstandthebarrierstorecruitingyoungpeoplewithcancertobrightlightanationalcohortstudyinengland
AT whelanjeremys qualitativestudytounderstandthebarrierstorecruitingyoungpeoplewithcancertobrightlightanationalcohortstudyinengland
AT taylorrachelm qualitativestudytounderstandthebarrierstorecruitingyoungpeoplewithcancertobrightlightanationalcohortstudyinengland