Cargando…

Reply: On assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Schabus, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx212
_version_ 1783280350944821248
author Schabus, Manuel
author_facet Schabus, Manuel
author_sort Schabus, Manuel
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5695662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56956622017-11-20 Reply: On assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms? Schabus, Manuel Brain Letters to the Editor Oxford University Press 2017-10 2017-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5695662/ /pubmed/28969379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx212 Text en © The Author (2017). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Letters to the Editor
Schabus, Manuel
Reply: On assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms?
title Reply: On assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms?
title_full Reply: On assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms?
title_fullStr Reply: On assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms?
title_full_unstemmed Reply: On assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms?
title_short Reply: On assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms?
title_sort reply: on assessing neurofeedback effects: should double-blind replace neurophysiological mechanisms?
topic Letters to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx212
work_keys_str_mv AT schabusmanuel replyonassessingneurofeedbackeffectsshoulddoubleblindreplaceneurophysiologicalmechanisms