Cargando…
Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment
The dataset presented in this article are related to the research article entitled “Hybrid coagulation-UF processes for spent filter backwash water treatment: a comparison studies for PAFCl and FeCl(3) as a pre-treatment” (Ebrahimi et al., 2017) [1]. This article reports the cost estimation for trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29188223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.040 |
_version_ | 1783280380355280896 |
---|---|
author | Ebrahimi, Afshin Mahdavi, Mokhtar Pirsaheb, Meghdad Alimohammadi, Fariborz Mahvi, Amir Hossein |
author_facet | Ebrahimi, Afshin Mahdavi, Mokhtar Pirsaheb, Meghdad Alimohammadi, Fariborz Mahvi, Amir Hossein |
author_sort | Ebrahimi, Afshin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The dataset presented in this article are related to the research article entitled “Hybrid coagulation-UF processes for spent filter backwash water treatment: a comparison studies for PAFCl and FeCl(3) as a pre-treatment” (Ebrahimi et al., 2017) [1]. This article reports the cost estimation for treating produced spent filter backwash water (SFBW) during water treatment in Isfahan- Iran by various methods including primary sedimentation, coagulation & flocculation, second clarification, ultra filtration (UF) and recirculation of settled SFBW to water treatment plant (WTP) entrance. Coagulation conducted by PAFCl and FeCl(3) as pre polymerized and traditional coagulants. Cost estimation showed that contrary to expectations, the recirculation of settled SFBW to WTP entrance is more expensive than other method and it costs about $ 37,814,817.6. Versus the cheapest option related to separate primary sedimentation, coagulation & flocculation in WTP. This option cost about $ 4,757,200 and $ 950,213 when FeCl3 and PAFCl used as coagulant, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5695916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56959162017-11-29 Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment Ebrahimi, Afshin Mahdavi, Mokhtar Pirsaheb, Meghdad Alimohammadi, Fariborz Mahvi, Amir Hossein Data Brief Environmental Sciences The dataset presented in this article are related to the research article entitled “Hybrid coagulation-UF processes for spent filter backwash water treatment: a comparison studies for PAFCl and FeCl(3) as a pre-treatment” (Ebrahimi et al., 2017) [1]. This article reports the cost estimation for treating produced spent filter backwash water (SFBW) during water treatment in Isfahan- Iran by various methods including primary sedimentation, coagulation & flocculation, second clarification, ultra filtration (UF) and recirculation of settled SFBW to water treatment plant (WTP) entrance. Coagulation conducted by PAFCl and FeCl(3) as pre polymerized and traditional coagulants. Cost estimation showed that contrary to expectations, the recirculation of settled SFBW to WTP entrance is more expensive than other method and it costs about $ 37,814,817.6. Versus the cheapest option related to separate primary sedimentation, coagulation & flocculation in WTP. This option cost about $ 4,757,200 and $ 950,213 when FeCl3 and PAFCl used as coagulant, respectively. Elsevier 2017-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5695916/ /pubmed/29188223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.040 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Environmental Sciences Ebrahimi, Afshin Mahdavi, Mokhtar Pirsaheb, Meghdad Alimohammadi, Fariborz Mahvi, Amir Hossein Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment |
title | Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment |
title_full | Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment |
title_fullStr | Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment |
title_short | Dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (SFBW) treatment |
title_sort | dataset on the cost estimation for spent filter backwash water (sfbw) treatment |
topic | Environmental Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5695916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29188223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebrahimiafshin datasetonthecostestimationforspentfilterbackwashwatersfbwtreatment AT mahdavimokhtar datasetonthecostestimationforspentfilterbackwashwatersfbwtreatment AT pirsahebmeghdad datasetonthecostestimationforspentfilterbackwashwatersfbwtreatment AT alimohammadifariborz datasetonthecostestimationforspentfilterbackwashwatersfbwtreatment AT mahviamirhossein datasetonthecostestimationforspentfilterbackwashwatersfbwtreatment |