Cargando…
Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment
INTRODUCTION: Drug administration by self-injection provides an option to treat chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Crohn’s disease (CD). However, a negative self-injection experience for patients may reduce patient adherence to the recommended treatment regimen. In t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28956300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-017-0080-4 |
_version_ | 1783280420797808640 |
---|---|
author | Schiff, Michael Saunderson, Shane Mountian, Irina Hartley, Paul |
author_facet | Schiff, Michael Saunderson, Shane Mountian, Irina Hartley, Paul |
author_sort | Schiff, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Drug administration by self-injection provides an option to treat chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Crohn’s disease (CD). However, a negative self-injection experience for patients may reduce patient adherence to the recommended treatment regimen. In this study, a holistic approach was used to identify common themes along the treatment pathway and at self-injection that, if changed, could improve patient experience and treatment outcomes. METHODS: Two ethnographic studies were conducted: Field Insights CODE (FI[CODE]) examined the treatment pathway within the context of the experience of living with RA or CD, and Injection Mission 2020 (IM2020) focused on the moment of self-injection. FI(CODE) used an open ethnographic approach to interview 62 patients and 10 healthcare professionals (HCPs) from the US and UK. IM2020 included a review of over 50 injection device design information sources from the sponsor, and interviews with 9 patients, 8 HCPs, and 5 medical device designers from the US, UK, Canada, and Japan. RESULTS: FI(CODE) identified suboptimal treatment practices along the treatment pathway in four key areas: treatment team communication, treatment choice, patient empowerment, and treatment delivery. Patients with more treatment options and greater disease understanding were less likely to struggle with the treatment process. IM2020 demonstrated that five related components influenced the self-injection experience: delivery process, emotional state, social perception, educational level, and ritualization of the self-injection process. CONCLUSION: These analyses highlight several potential areas for improvement, including aligning the device more to patients’ needs to improve treatment adherence, better accessibility to educational resources to increase patient disease understanding, and guidance to empower patients to develop an optimal personalized self-injection ritual. FUNDING: UCB Pharma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40744-017-0080-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5696292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56962922017-12-04 Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment Schiff, Michael Saunderson, Shane Mountian, Irina Hartley, Paul Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Drug administration by self-injection provides an option to treat chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Crohn’s disease (CD). However, a negative self-injection experience for patients may reduce patient adherence to the recommended treatment regimen. In this study, a holistic approach was used to identify common themes along the treatment pathway and at self-injection that, if changed, could improve patient experience and treatment outcomes. METHODS: Two ethnographic studies were conducted: Field Insights CODE (FI[CODE]) examined the treatment pathway within the context of the experience of living with RA or CD, and Injection Mission 2020 (IM2020) focused on the moment of self-injection. FI(CODE) used an open ethnographic approach to interview 62 patients and 10 healthcare professionals (HCPs) from the US and UK. IM2020 included a review of over 50 injection device design information sources from the sponsor, and interviews with 9 patients, 8 HCPs, and 5 medical device designers from the US, UK, Canada, and Japan. RESULTS: FI(CODE) identified suboptimal treatment practices along the treatment pathway in four key areas: treatment team communication, treatment choice, patient empowerment, and treatment delivery. Patients with more treatment options and greater disease understanding were less likely to struggle with the treatment process. IM2020 demonstrated that five related components influenced the self-injection experience: delivery process, emotional state, social perception, educational level, and ritualization of the self-injection process. CONCLUSION: These analyses highlight several potential areas for improvement, including aligning the device more to patients’ needs to improve treatment adherence, better accessibility to educational resources to increase patient disease understanding, and guidance to empower patients to develop an optimal personalized self-injection ritual. FUNDING: UCB Pharma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40744-017-0080-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2017-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5696292/ /pubmed/28956300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-017-0080-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Schiff, Michael Saunderson, Shane Mountian, Irina Hartley, Paul Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment |
title | Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment |
title_full | Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment |
title_fullStr | Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment |
title_short | Chronic Disease and Self-Injection: Ethnographic Investigations into the Patient Experience During Treatment |
title_sort | chronic disease and self-injection: ethnographic investigations into the patient experience during treatment |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28956300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-017-0080-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schiffmichael chronicdiseaseandselfinjectionethnographicinvestigationsintothepatientexperienceduringtreatment AT saundersonshane chronicdiseaseandselfinjectionethnographicinvestigationsintothepatientexperienceduringtreatment AT mountianirina chronicdiseaseandselfinjectionethnographicinvestigationsintothepatientexperienceduringtreatment AT hartleypaul chronicdiseaseandselfinjectionethnographicinvestigationsintothepatientexperienceduringtreatment |