Cargando…
The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies
Complex sets of cues can be important in recognizing and responding to conspecific mating competitors and avoiding potentially costly heterospecific competitive interactions. Within Drosophila melanogaster, males can detect sensory inputs from conspecifics to assess the level of competition. They re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3455 |
_version_ | 1783280448839876608 |
---|---|
author | Bretman, Amanda Rouse, James Westmancoat, James D. Chapman, Tracey |
author_facet | Bretman, Amanda Rouse, James Westmancoat, James D. Chapman, Tracey |
author_sort | Bretman, Amanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Complex sets of cues can be important in recognizing and responding to conspecific mating competitors and avoiding potentially costly heterospecific competitive interactions. Within Drosophila melanogaster, males can detect sensory inputs from conspecifics to assess the level of competition. They respond to rivals by significantly extending mating duration and gain significant fitness benefits from doing so. Here, we tested the idea that the multiple sensory cues used by D. melanogaster males to detect conspecifics also function to minimize “off‐target” responses to heterospecific males that they might encounter (Drosophila simulans, Drosophila yakuba, Drosophila pseudoobscura, or Drosophila virilis). Focal D. melanogaster males exposed to D. simulans or D. pseudoobscura subsequently increased mating duration, but to a lesser extent than following exposure to conspecific rivals. The magnitude of rivals’ responses expressed by D. melanogaster males did not align with genetic distance between species, and none of the sensory manipulations caused D. melanogaster to respond to males of all other species tested. However, when we removed or provided “false” sensory cues, D. melanogaster males became more likely to show increased mating duration responses to heterospecific males. We suggest that benefits of avoiding inaccurate assessment of the competitive environment may shape the evolution of recognition cues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5696429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56964292017-11-29 The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies Bretman, Amanda Rouse, James Westmancoat, James D. Chapman, Tracey Ecol Evol Original Research Complex sets of cues can be important in recognizing and responding to conspecific mating competitors and avoiding potentially costly heterospecific competitive interactions. Within Drosophila melanogaster, males can detect sensory inputs from conspecifics to assess the level of competition. They respond to rivals by significantly extending mating duration and gain significant fitness benefits from doing so. Here, we tested the idea that the multiple sensory cues used by D. melanogaster males to detect conspecifics also function to minimize “off‐target” responses to heterospecific males that they might encounter (Drosophila simulans, Drosophila yakuba, Drosophila pseudoobscura, or Drosophila virilis). Focal D. melanogaster males exposed to D. simulans or D. pseudoobscura subsequently increased mating duration, but to a lesser extent than following exposure to conspecific rivals. The magnitude of rivals’ responses expressed by D. melanogaster males did not align with genetic distance between species, and none of the sensory manipulations caused D. melanogaster to respond to males of all other species tested. However, when we removed or provided “false” sensory cues, D. melanogaster males became more likely to show increased mating duration responses to heterospecific males. We suggest that benefits of avoiding inaccurate assessment of the competitive environment may shape the evolution of recognition cues. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5696429/ /pubmed/29187965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3455 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bretman, Amanda Rouse, James Westmancoat, James D. Chapman, Tracey The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies |
title | The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies |
title_full | The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies |
title_fullStr | The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies |
title_short | The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies |
title_sort | role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in drosophila melanogaster fruitflies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bretmanamanda theroleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies AT rousejames theroleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies AT westmancoatjamesd theroleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies AT chapmantracey theroleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies AT bretmanamanda roleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies AT rousejames roleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies AT westmancoatjamesd roleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies AT chapmantracey roleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies |