Cargando…

The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies

Complex sets of cues can be important in recognizing and responding to conspecific mating competitors and avoiding potentially costly heterospecific competitive interactions. Within Drosophila melanogaster, males can detect sensory inputs from conspecifics to assess the level of competition. They re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bretman, Amanda, Rouse, James, Westmancoat, James D., Chapman, Tracey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3455
_version_ 1783280448839876608
author Bretman, Amanda
Rouse, James
Westmancoat, James D.
Chapman, Tracey
author_facet Bretman, Amanda
Rouse, James
Westmancoat, James D.
Chapman, Tracey
author_sort Bretman, Amanda
collection PubMed
description Complex sets of cues can be important in recognizing and responding to conspecific mating competitors and avoiding potentially costly heterospecific competitive interactions. Within Drosophila melanogaster, males can detect sensory inputs from conspecifics to assess the level of competition. They respond to rivals by significantly extending mating duration and gain significant fitness benefits from doing so. Here, we tested the idea that the multiple sensory cues used by D. melanogaster males to detect conspecifics also function to minimize “off‐target” responses to heterospecific males that they might encounter (Drosophila simulans, Drosophila yakuba, Drosophila pseudoobscura, or Drosophila virilis). Focal D. melanogaster males exposed to D. simulans or D. pseudoobscura subsequently increased mating duration, but to a lesser extent than following exposure to conspecific rivals. The magnitude of rivals’ responses expressed by D. melanogaster males did not align with genetic distance between species, and none of the sensory manipulations caused D. melanogaster to respond to males of all other species tested. However, when we removed or provided “false” sensory cues, D. melanogaster males became more likely to show increased mating duration responses to heterospecific males. We suggest that benefits of avoiding inaccurate assessment of the competitive environment may shape the evolution of recognition cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5696429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56964292017-11-29 The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies Bretman, Amanda Rouse, James Westmancoat, James D. Chapman, Tracey Ecol Evol Original Research Complex sets of cues can be important in recognizing and responding to conspecific mating competitors and avoiding potentially costly heterospecific competitive interactions. Within Drosophila melanogaster, males can detect sensory inputs from conspecifics to assess the level of competition. They respond to rivals by significantly extending mating duration and gain significant fitness benefits from doing so. Here, we tested the idea that the multiple sensory cues used by D. melanogaster males to detect conspecifics also function to minimize “off‐target” responses to heterospecific males that they might encounter (Drosophila simulans, Drosophila yakuba, Drosophila pseudoobscura, or Drosophila virilis). Focal D. melanogaster males exposed to D. simulans or D. pseudoobscura subsequently increased mating duration, but to a lesser extent than following exposure to conspecific rivals. The magnitude of rivals’ responses expressed by D. melanogaster males did not align with genetic distance between species, and none of the sensory manipulations caused D. melanogaster to respond to males of all other species tested. However, when we removed or provided “false” sensory cues, D. melanogaster males became more likely to show increased mating duration responses to heterospecific males. We suggest that benefits of avoiding inaccurate assessment of the competitive environment may shape the evolution of recognition cues. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5696429/ /pubmed/29187965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3455 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bretman, Amanda
Rouse, James
Westmancoat, James D.
Chapman, Tracey
The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies
title The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies
title_full The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies
title_fullStr The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies
title_full_unstemmed The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies
title_short The role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in Drosophila melanogaster fruitflies
title_sort role of species‐specific sensory cues in male responses to mating rivals in drosophila melanogaster fruitflies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29187965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3455
work_keys_str_mv AT bretmanamanda theroleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies
AT rousejames theroleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies
AT westmancoatjamesd theroleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies
AT chapmantracey theroleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies
AT bretmanamanda roleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies
AT rousejames roleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies
AT westmancoatjamesd roleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies
AT chapmantracey roleofspeciesspecificsensorycuesinmaleresponsestomatingrivalsindrosophilamelanogasterfruitflies