Cargando…

A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse

The hippocampus plays a critical role in learning and memory and higher cognitive functions, and its dysfunction has been implicated in various neuropathological disorders. Electrophysiological recording undertaken in live brain slices is one of the most powerful tools for investigating hippocampal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Guoxiang, Metheny, Hannah, Johnson, Brian N., Cohen, Akiva S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00107
_version_ 1783280482097561600
author Xiong, Guoxiang
Metheny, Hannah
Johnson, Brian N.
Cohen, Akiva S.
author_facet Xiong, Guoxiang
Metheny, Hannah
Johnson, Brian N.
Cohen, Akiva S.
author_sort Xiong, Guoxiang
collection PubMed
description The hippocampus plays a critical role in learning and memory and higher cognitive functions, and its dysfunction has been implicated in various neuropathological disorders. Electrophysiological recording undertaken in live brain slices is one of the most powerful tools for investigating hippocampal cellular and network activities. The plane for cutting the slices determines which afferent and/or efferent connections are best preserved, and there are three commonly used slices: hippocampal-entorhinal cortex (HEC), coronal and transverse. All three slices have been widely used for studying the major afferent hippocampal pathways including the perforant path (PP), the mossy fibers (MFs) and the Schaffer collaterals (SCs). Surprisingly, there has never been a systematic investigation of the anatomical and functional consequences of slicing at a particular angle. In the present study, we focused on how well fiber pathways are preserved from the entorhinal cortex (EC) to the hippocampus, and within the hippocampus, in slices generated by sectioning at different angles. The postmortem neural tract tracer 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI) was used to label afferent fibers to hippocampal principal neurons in fixed slices or whole brains. Laser scanning confocal microscopy was adopted for imaging DiI-labeled axons and terminals. We demonstrated that PP fibers were well preserved in HEC slices, MFs in both HEC and transverse slices and SCs in all three types of slices. Correspondingly, field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) could be consistently evoked in HEC slices when stimulating PP fibers and recorded in stratum lacunosum-moleculare (sl-m) of area CA1, and when stimulating the dentate granule cell layer (gcl) and recording in stratum lucidum (sl) of area CA3. The MF evoked fEPSPs could not be recorded in CA3 from coronal slices. In contrast to our DiI-tracing data demonstrating severely truncated PP fibers in coronal slices, fEPSPs could still be recorded in CA1 sl-m in this plane, suggesting that an additional afferent fiber pathway other than PP might be involved. The present study increases our understanding of which hippocampal pathways are best preserved in the three most common brain slice preparations, and will help investigators determine the appropriate slices to use for physiological studies depending on the subregion of interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5696601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56966012017-11-30 A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse Xiong, Guoxiang Metheny, Hannah Johnson, Brian N. Cohen, Akiva S. Front Neuroanat Neuroscience The hippocampus plays a critical role in learning and memory and higher cognitive functions, and its dysfunction has been implicated in various neuropathological disorders. Electrophysiological recording undertaken in live brain slices is one of the most powerful tools for investigating hippocampal cellular and network activities. The plane for cutting the slices determines which afferent and/or efferent connections are best preserved, and there are three commonly used slices: hippocampal-entorhinal cortex (HEC), coronal and transverse. All three slices have been widely used for studying the major afferent hippocampal pathways including the perforant path (PP), the mossy fibers (MFs) and the Schaffer collaterals (SCs). Surprisingly, there has never been a systematic investigation of the anatomical and functional consequences of slicing at a particular angle. In the present study, we focused on how well fiber pathways are preserved from the entorhinal cortex (EC) to the hippocampus, and within the hippocampus, in slices generated by sectioning at different angles. The postmortem neural tract tracer 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI) was used to label afferent fibers to hippocampal principal neurons in fixed slices or whole brains. Laser scanning confocal microscopy was adopted for imaging DiI-labeled axons and terminals. We demonstrated that PP fibers were well preserved in HEC slices, MFs in both HEC and transverse slices and SCs in all three types of slices. Correspondingly, field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) could be consistently evoked in HEC slices when stimulating PP fibers and recorded in stratum lacunosum-moleculare (sl-m) of area CA1, and when stimulating the dentate granule cell layer (gcl) and recording in stratum lucidum (sl) of area CA3. The MF evoked fEPSPs could not be recorded in CA3 from coronal slices. In contrast to our DiI-tracing data demonstrating severely truncated PP fibers in coronal slices, fEPSPs could still be recorded in CA1 sl-m in this plane, suggesting that an additional afferent fiber pathway other than PP might be involved. The present study increases our understanding of which hippocampal pathways are best preserved in the three most common brain slice preparations, and will help investigators determine the appropriate slices to use for physiological studies depending on the subregion of interest. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5696601/ /pubmed/29201002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00107 Text en Copyright © 2017 Xiong, Metheny, Johnson and Cohen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Xiong, Guoxiang
Metheny, Hannah
Johnson, Brian N.
Cohen, Akiva S.
A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse
title A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse
title_full A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse
title_fullStr A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse
title_short A Comparison of Different Slicing Planes in Preservation of Major Hippocampal Pathway Fibers in the Mouse
title_sort comparison of different slicing planes in preservation of major hippocampal pathway fibers in the mouse
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00107
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongguoxiang acomparisonofdifferentslicingplanesinpreservationofmajorhippocampalpathwayfibersinthemouse
AT methenyhannah acomparisonofdifferentslicingplanesinpreservationofmajorhippocampalpathwayfibersinthemouse
AT johnsonbriann acomparisonofdifferentslicingplanesinpreservationofmajorhippocampalpathwayfibersinthemouse
AT cohenakivas acomparisonofdifferentslicingplanesinpreservationofmajorhippocampalpathwayfibersinthemouse
AT xiongguoxiang comparisonofdifferentslicingplanesinpreservationofmajorhippocampalpathwayfibersinthemouse
AT methenyhannah comparisonofdifferentslicingplanesinpreservationofmajorhippocampalpathwayfibersinthemouse
AT johnsonbriann comparisonofdifferentslicingplanesinpreservationofmajorhippocampalpathwayfibersinthemouse
AT cohenakivas comparisonofdifferentslicingplanesinpreservationofmajorhippocampalpathwayfibersinthemouse