Cargando…

Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage

Non-invasive brain current stimulation (NIBS) is a promising and versatile tool for inducing neuroplasticity, protection and functional rehabilitation of damaged neuronal systems. It is technically simple, requires no surgery, and has significant beneficial effects. However, there are various techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henrich-Noack, Petra, Sergeeva, Elena G., Sabel, Bernhard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29171414
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.217322
_version_ 1783280521145483264
author Henrich-Noack, Petra
Sergeeva, Elena G.
Sabel, Bernhard A.
author_facet Henrich-Noack, Petra
Sergeeva, Elena G.
Sabel, Bernhard A.
author_sort Henrich-Noack, Petra
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive brain current stimulation (NIBS) is a promising and versatile tool for inducing neuroplasticity, protection and functional rehabilitation of damaged neuronal systems. It is technically simple, requires no surgery, and has significant beneficial effects. However, there are various technical approaches for NIBS which influence neuronal networks in significantly different ways. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), alternating current stimulation (ACS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) all have been applied to modulate brain activity in animal experiments under normal and pathological conditions. Also clinical trials have shown that tDCS, rTMS and ACS induce significant behavioural effects and can – depending on the parameters chosen – enhance or decrease brain excitability and influence performance and learning as well as rehabilitation and protective mechanisms. The diverse phaenomena and partially opposing effects of NIBS are not yet fully understood and mechanisms of action need to be explored further in order to select appropriate parameters for a given task, such as current type and strength, timing, distribution of current densities and electrode position. In this review, we will discuss the various parameters which need to be considered when designing a NIBS protocol and will put them into context with the envisaged applications in experimental neurobiology and medicine such as vision restoration, motor rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5696830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56968302017-12-04 Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage Henrich-Noack, Petra Sergeeva, Elena G. Sabel, Bernhard A. Neural Regen Res Invited Review Non-invasive brain current stimulation (NIBS) is a promising and versatile tool for inducing neuroplasticity, protection and functional rehabilitation of damaged neuronal systems. It is technically simple, requires no surgery, and has significant beneficial effects. However, there are various technical approaches for NIBS which influence neuronal networks in significantly different ways. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), alternating current stimulation (ACS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) all have been applied to modulate brain activity in animal experiments under normal and pathological conditions. Also clinical trials have shown that tDCS, rTMS and ACS induce significant behavioural effects and can – depending on the parameters chosen – enhance or decrease brain excitability and influence performance and learning as well as rehabilitation and protective mechanisms. The diverse phaenomena and partially opposing effects of NIBS are not yet fully understood and mechanisms of action need to be explored further in order to select appropriate parameters for a given task, such as current type and strength, timing, distribution of current densities and electrode position. In this review, we will discuss the various parameters which need to be considered when designing a NIBS protocol and will put them into context with the envisaged applications in experimental neurobiology and medicine such as vision restoration, motor rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5696830/ /pubmed/29171414 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.217322 Text en Copyright: © Neural Regeneration Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Henrich-Noack, Petra
Sergeeva, Elena G.
Sabel, Bernhard A.
Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage
title Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage
title_full Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage
title_fullStr Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage
title_short Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage
title_sort non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29171414
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.217322
work_keys_str_mv AT henrichnoackpetra noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationfromacutetolatestagetreatmentofcentralnervoussystemdamage
AT sergeevaelenag noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationfromacutetolatestagetreatmentofcentralnervoussystemdamage
AT sabelbernharda noninvasiveelectricalbrainstimulationfromacutetolatestagetreatmentofcentralnervoussystemdamage