Cargando…
Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar
BACKGROUND: Conventional bright blood late gadolinium enhancement (bright blood LGE) imaging is a routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) technique offering excellent contrast between areas of LGE and normal myocardium. However, contrast between LGE and blood is frequently poor. Dark blood L...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0407-x |
_version_ | 1783280529362124800 |
---|---|
author | Francis, Rohin Kellman, Peter Kotecha, Tushar Baggiano, Andrea Norrington, Karl Martinez-Naharro, Ana Nordin, Sabrina Knight, Daniel S. Rakhit, Roby D. Lockie, Tim Hawkins, Philip N. Moon, James C. Hausenloy, Derek J. Xue, Hui Hansen, Michael S. Fontana, Marianna |
author_facet | Francis, Rohin Kellman, Peter Kotecha, Tushar Baggiano, Andrea Norrington, Karl Martinez-Naharro, Ana Nordin, Sabrina Knight, Daniel S. Rakhit, Roby D. Lockie, Tim Hawkins, Philip N. Moon, James C. Hausenloy, Derek J. Xue, Hui Hansen, Michael S. Fontana, Marianna |
author_sort | Francis, Rohin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Conventional bright blood late gadolinium enhancement (bright blood LGE) imaging is a routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) technique offering excellent contrast between areas of LGE and normal myocardium. However, contrast between LGE and blood is frequently poor. Dark blood LGE (DB LGE) employs an inversion recovery T2 preparation to suppress the blood pool, thereby increasing the contrast between the endocardium and blood. The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic utility of a novel DB phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) LGE CMR sequence to standard bright blood PSIR LGE. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients referred for clinical CMR were scanned. A full left ventricle short axis stack was performed using both techniques, varying which was performed first in a 1:1 ratio. Two experienced observers analyzed all bright blood LGE and DB LGE stacks, which were randomized and anonymized. A scoring system was devised to quantify the presence and extent of gadolinium enhancement and the confidence with which the diagnosis could be made. RESULTS: A total of 2752 LV segments were analyzed. There was very good inter-observer correlation for quantifying LGE. DB LGE analysis found 41.5% more segments that exhibited hyperenhancement in comparison to bright blood LGE (248/2752 segments (9.0%) positive for LGE with bright blood; 351/2752 segments (12.8%) positive for LGE with DB; p < 0.05). DB LGE also allowed observers to be more confident when diagnosing LGE (bright blood LGE high confidence in 154/248 regions (62.1%); DB LGE in 275/324 (84.9%) regions (p < 0.05)). Eighteen patients with no bright blood LGE were found to have had DB LGE, 15 of whom had no known history of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: DB LGE significantly increases LGE detection compared to standard bright blood LGE. It also increases observer confidence, particularly for subendocardial LGE, which may have important clinical implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5696884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56968842017-12-01 Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar Francis, Rohin Kellman, Peter Kotecha, Tushar Baggiano, Andrea Norrington, Karl Martinez-Naharro, Ana Nordin, Sabrina Knight, Daniel S. Rakhit, Roby D. Lockie, Tim Hawkins, Philip N. Moon, James C. Hausenloy, Derek J. Xue, Hui Hansen, Michael S. Fontana, Marianna J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Conventional bright blood late gadolinium enhancement (bright blood LGE) imaging is a routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) technique offering excellent contrast between areas of LGE and normal myocardium. However, contrast between LGE and blood is frequently poor. Dark blood LGE (DB LGE) employs an inversion recovery T2 preparation to suppress the blood pool, thereby increasing the contrast between the endocardium and blood. The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic utility of a novel DB phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) LGE CMR sequence to standard bright blood PSIR LGE. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients referred for clinical CMR were scanned. A full left ventricle short axis stack was performed using both techniques, varying which was performed first in a 1:1 ratio. Two experienced observers analyzed all bright blood LGE and DB LGE stacks, which were randomized and anonymized. A scoring system was devised to quantify the presence and extent of gadolinium enhancement and the confidence with which the diagnosis could be made. RESULTS: A total of 2752 LV segments were analyzed. There was very good inter-observer correlation for quantifying LGE. DB LGE analysis found 41.5% more segments that exhibited hyperenhancement in comparison to bright blood LGE (248/2752 segments (9.0%) positive for LGE with bright blood; 351/2752 segments (12.8%) positive for LGE with DB; p < 0.05). DB LGE also allowed observers to be more confident when diagnosing LGE (bright blood LGE high confidence in 154/248 regions (62.1%); DB LGE in 275/324 (84.9%) regions (p < 0.05)). Eighteen patients with no bright blood LGE were found to have had DB LGE, 15 of whom had no known history of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: DB LGE significantly increases LGE detection compared to standard bright blood LGE. It also increases observer confidence, particularly for subendocardial LGE, which may have important clinical implications. BioMed Central 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5696884/ /pubmed/29162123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0407-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Francis, Rohin Kellman, Peter Kotecha, Tushar Baggiano, Andrea Norrington, Karl Martinez-Naharro, Ana Nordin, Sabrina Knight, Daniel S. Rakhit, Roby D. Lockie, Tim Hawkins, Philip N. Moon, James C. Hausenloy, Derek J. Xue, Hui Hansen, Michael S. Fontana, Marianna Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar |
title | Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar |
title_full | Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar |
title_fullStr | Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar |
title_short | Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar |
title_sort | prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5696884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0407-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francisrohin prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT kellmanpeter prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT kotechatushar prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT baggianoandrea prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT norringtonkarl prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT martineznaharroana prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT nordinsabrina prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT knightdaniels prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT rakhitrobyd prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT lockietim prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT hawkinsphilipn prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT moonjamesc prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT hausenloyderekj prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT xuehui prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT hansenmichaels prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar AT fontanamarianna prospectivecomparisonofnoveldarkbloodlategadoliniumenhancementwithconventionalbrightbloodimagingforthedetectionofscar |