Cargando…

Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Based on moderate quality evidence, routine pelvic examination is strongly recommended against in asymptomatic women. The aims of this study was to quantify the extent of routine pelvic examinations within specialized health care in Norway, to assess if the use of these services differs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenlund, Ingvild Mathiesen, Leivseth, Linda, Nilsen, Ingard, Førde, Olav Helge, Revhaug, Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0471-2
_version_ 1783280534149922816
author Rosenlund, Ingvild Mathiesen
Leivseth, Linda
Nilsen, Ingard
Førde, Olav Helge
Revhaug, Arthur
author_facet Rosenlund, Ingvild Mathiesen
Leivseth, Linda
Nilsen, Ingard
Førde, Olav Helge
Revhaug, Arthur
author_sort Rosenlund, Ingvild Mathiesen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on moderate quality evidence, routine pelvic examination is strongly recommended against in asymptomatic women. The aims of this study was to quantify the extent of routine pelvic examinations within specialized health care in Norway, to assess if the use of these services differs across hospital referral regions and to assess if the use of colposcopy and ultrasound differs with gynecologists’ payment models. METHODS: Nationwide cross-sectional study including all women aged 18 years and older in Norway in the years 2014–16 (2,038,747). Data was extracted from the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. The main outcome measures were 1. The number of appointments per 1000 women with a primary diagnosis of “Encounter for gynecological examination without complaint, suspected or reported diagnosis.” 2. The age-standardized number of these appointments per 1000 women in the 21 different hospital referral regions of Norway. 3. The use of colposcopy and ultrasound in routine pelvic examinations, provided by gynecologists with fixed salaries and gynecologists paid by a fee-for-service model. RESULTS: Annually 22.2 out of every 1000 women in Norway had a routine pelvic examination, with variation across regions from 6.6 to 43.9 per 1000. Gynecologists with fixed salaries performed colposcopy in 1.6% and ultrasound in 74.5% of appointments. Corresponding numbers for fee-for-service gynecologists were 49.2% and 96.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Routine pelvic examinations are widely performed in Norway. The variation across regions is extensive. Our results strongly indicate that fee-for-service payments for gynecologists skyrocket the use of colposcopy and increase the use of ultrasound in pelvic examinations of asymptomatic women. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-017-0471-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56970552017-12-01 Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study Rosenlund, Ingvild Mathiesen Leivseth, Linda Nilsen, Ingard Førde, Olav Helge Revhaug, Arthur BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Based on moderate quality evidence, routine pelvic examination is strongly recommended against in asymptomatic women. The aims of this study was to quantify the extent of routine pelvic examinations within specialized health care in Norway, to assess if the use of these services differs across hospital referral regions and to assess if the use of colposcopy and ultrasound differs with gynecologists’ payment models. METHODS: Nationwide cross-sectional study including all women aged 18 years and older in Norway in the years 2014–16 (2,038,747). Data was extracted from the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. The main outcome measures were 1. The number of appointments per 1000 women with a primary diagnosis of “Encounter for gynecological examination without complaint, suspected or reported diagnosis.” 2. The age-standardized number of these appointments per 1000 women in the 21 different hospital referral regions of Norway. 3. The use of colposcopy and ultrasound in routine pelvic examinations, provided by gynecologists with fixed salaries and gynecologists paid by a fee-for-service model. RESULTS: Annually 22.2 out of every 1000 women in Norway had a routine pelvic examination, with variation across regions from 6.6 to 43.9 per 1000. Gynecologists with fixed salaries performed colposcopy in 1.6% and ultrasound in 74.5% of appointments. Corresponding numbers for fee-for-service gynecologists were 49.2% and 96.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Routine pelvic examinations are widely performed in Norway. The variation across regions is extensive. Our results strongly indicate that fee-for-service payments for gynecologists skyrocket the use of colposcopy and increase the use of ultrasound in pelvic examinations of asymptomatic women. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-017-0471-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5697055/ /pubmed/29162106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0471-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rosenlund, Ingvild Mathiesen
Leivseth, Linda
Nilsen, Ingard
Førde, Olav Helge
Revhaug, Arthur
Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study
title Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study
title_full Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study
title_short Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study
title_sort extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29162106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0471-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenlundingvildmathiesen extentregionalvariationandimpactofgynecologistpaymentmodelsinroutinepelvicexaminationsanationwidecrosssectionalstudy
AT leivsethlinda extentregionalvariationandimpactofgynecologistpaymentmodelsinroutinepelvicexaminationsanationwidecrosssectionalstudy
AT nilseningard extentregionalvariationandimpactofgynecologistpaymentmodelsinroutinepelvicexaminationsanationwidecrosssectionalstudy
AT førdeolavhelge extentregionalvariationandimpactofgynecologistpaymentmodelsinroutinepelvicexaminationsanationwidecrosssectionalstudy
AT revhaugarthur extentregionalvariationandimpactofgynecologistpaymentmodelsinroutinepelvicexaminationsanationwidecrosssectionalstudy