Cargando…

Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled comprehensive analysis of the gut microbiota, which is closely linked to the health of the host. Consequently, several studies have explored the factors affecting gut microbiota composition. In recent years, increasi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Junhyung, An, Jae-Uk, Kim, Woohyun, Lee, Soomin, Cho, Seongbeom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5
_version_ 1783280542644436992
author Kim, Junhyung
An, Jae-Uk
Kim, Woohyun
Lee, Soomin
Cho, Seongbeom
author_facet Kim, Junhyung
An, Jae-Uk
Kim, Woohyun
Lee, Soomin
Cho, Seongbeom
author_sort Kim, Junhyung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled comprehensive analysis of the gut microbiota, which is closely linked to the health of the host. Consequently, several studies have explored the factors affecting gut microbiota composition. In recent years, increasing number of dog owners are feeding their pets a natural diet i.e., one consisting of bones, raw meat (such as chicken and beef), and vegetables, instead of commercial feed. However, the effect of these diets on the microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six dogs fed a natural diet and five dogs fed a commercial feed were selected; dog fecal metagenomic DNA samples were analyzed using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Pronounced differences in alpha and beta diversities, and taxonomic composition of the core gut microbiota were observed between the two groups. According to alpha diversity, the number of operational taxonomic units, the richness estimates, and diversity indices of microbiota were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the natural diet group than in the commercial feed group. Based on beta diversity, most samples clustered together according to the diet type (p = 0.004). Additionally, the core microbiota between the two groups was different at the phylum, family, and species levels. Marked differences in the taxonomic composition of the core microbiota of the two groups were observed at the species level; Clostridium perfringens (p = 0.017) and Fusobacterium varium (p = 0.030) were more abundant in the natural diet group. CONCLUSIONS: The gut microbiota of dogs is significantly influenced by diet type (i.e., natural diet and commercial feed). Specifically, dogs fed a natural diet have more diverse and abundant microbial composition in the gut microbiota than dogs fed a commercial feed. In addition, this study suggests that in dogs fed a natural diet, the potential risk of opportunistic infection could be higher, than in dogs fed a commercial feed. The type of diet might therefore play a key role in animal health by affecting the gut microbiota. This study could be the basis for future gut microbiota research in dogs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56970932017-12-01 Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform Kim, Junhyung An, Jae-Uk Kim, Woohyun Lee, Soomin Cho, Seongbeom Gut Pathog Research BACKGROUND: Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled comprehensive analysis of the gut microbiota, which is closely linked to the health of the host. Consequently, several studies have explored the factors affecting gut microbiota composition. In recent years, increasing number of dog owners are feeding their pets a natural diet i.e., one consisting of bones, raw meat (such as chicken and beef), and vegetables, instead of commercial feed. However, the effect of these diets on the microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six dogs fed a natural diet and five dogs fed a commercial feed were selected; dog fecal metagenomic DNA samples were analyzed using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Pronounced differences in alpha and beta diversities, and taxonomic composition of the core gut microbiota were observed between the two groups. According to alpha diversity, the number of operational taxonomic units, the richness estimates, and diversity indices of microbiota were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the natural diet group than in the commercial feed group. Based on beta diversity, most samples clustered together according to the diet type (p = 0.004). Additionally, the core microbiota between the two groups was different at the phylum, family, and species levels. Marked differences in the taxonomic composition of the core microbiota of the two groups were observed at the species level; Clostridium perfringens (p = 0.017) and Fusobacterium varium (p = 0.030) were more abundant in the natural diet group. CONCLUSIONS: The gut microbiota of dogs is significantly influenced by diet type (i.e., natural diet and commercial feed). Specifically, dogs fed a natural diet have more diverse and abundant microbial composition in the gut microbiota than dogs fed a commercial feed. In addition, this study suggests that in dogs fed a natural diet, the potential risk of opportunistic infection could be higher, than in dogs fed a commercial feed. The type of diet might therefore play a key role in animal health by affecting the gut microbiota. This study could be the basis for future gut microbiota research in dogs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5697093/ /pubmed/29201150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kim, Junhyung
An, Jae-Uk
Kim, Woohyun
Lee, Soomin
Cho, Seongbeom
Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_full Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_fullStr Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_short Differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the Illumina MiSeq platform
title_sort differences in the gut microbiota of dogs (canis lupus familiaris) fed a natural diet or a commercial feed revealed by the illumina miseq platform
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29201150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0218-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjunhyung differencesinthegutmicrobiotaofdogscanislupusfamiliarisfedanaturaldietoracommercialfeedrevealedbytheilluminamiseqplatform
AT anjaeuk differencesinthegutmicrobiotaofdogscanislupusfamiliarisfedanaturaldietoracommercialfeedrevealedbytheilluminamiseqplatform
AT kimwoohyun differencesinthegutmicrobiotaofdogscanislupusfamiliarisfedanaturaldietoracommercialfeedrevealedbytheilluminamiseqplatform
AT leesoomin differencesinthegutmicrobiotaofdogscanislupusfamiliarisfedanaturaldietoracommercialfeedrevealedbytheilluminamiseqplatform
AT choseongbeom differencesinthegutmicrobiotaofdogscanislupusfamiliarisfedanaturaldietoracommercialfeedrevealedbytheilluminamiseqplatform