Cargando…

Full Step Cycle Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Barefoot Walking and a Traditional Shoe Walking in Healthy Youth: Insights for Barefoot Technology

OBJECTIVE: Barefoot technology shoes are becoming increasingly popular, yet modifications are still needed. The present study aims to gain valuable insights by comparing barefoot walking to neutral shoe walking in a healthy youth population. METHODS: 28 healthy university students (22 females and 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yi, Hou, Qinghua, Wang, Chuhuai, Sellers, Andrew J., Simpson, Travis, Bennett, Bradford C., Russell, Shawn D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2638908
_version_ 1783280548885561344
author Xu, Yi
Hou, Qinghua
Wang, Chuhuai
Sellers, Andrew J.
Simpson, Travis
Bennett, Bradford C.
Russell, Shawn D.
author_facet Xu, Yi
Hou, Qinghua
Wang, Chuhuai
Sellers, Andrew J.
Simpson, Travis
Bennett, Bradford C.
Russell, Shawn D.
author_sort Xu, Yi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Barefoot technology shoes are becoming increasingly popular, yet modifications are still needed. The present study aims to gain valuable insights by comparing barefoot walking to neutral shoe walking in a healthy youth population. METHODS: 28 healthy university students (22 females and 6 males) were recruited to walk on a 10-meter walkway both barefoot and in neutral running shoes at their comfortable walking speed. Full step cycle kinematic and kinetic data were collected using an 8-camera motion capture system. RESULTS: In the early stance phase, the knee extension moment (MK1), the first peak absorbed joint power at the knee joint (PK1), and the flexion angle of knee/dorsiflexion angle of the ankle were significantly reduced when walking in neutral running shoes. However, in the late stance, barefoot walking resulted in decreased hip joint flexion moment (MH2), second peak extension knee moment (MK3), hip flexors absorbed power (PH2), hip flexors generated power (PH3), second peak absorbed power by knee flexors (PK2), and second peak anterior-posterior component of joint force at the hip (APFH2), knee (APFK2), and ankle (APFA2). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that it should be cautious to discard conventional elements from future running shoe designs and rush to embrace the barefoot technology fashion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56971212017-12-13 Full Step Cycle Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Barefoot Walking and a Traditional Shoe Walking in Healthy Youth: Insights for Barefoot Technology Xu, Yi Hou, Qinghua Wang, Chuhuai Sellers, Andrew J. Simpson, Travis Bennett, Bradford C. Russell, Shawn D. Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article OBJECTIVE: Barefoot technology shoes are becoming increasingly popular, yet modifications are still needed. The present study aims to gain valuable insights by comparing barefoot walking to neutral shoe walking in a healthy youth population. METHODS: 28 healthy university students (22 females and 6 males) were recruited to walk on a 10-meter walkway both barefoot and in neutral running shoes at their comfortable walking speed. Full step cycle kinematic and kinetic data were collected using an 8-camera motion capture system. RESULTS: In the early stance phase, the knee extension moment (MK1), the first peak absorbed joint power at the knee joint (PK1), and the flexion angle of knee/dorsiflexion angle of the ankle were significantly reduced when walking in neutral running shoes. However, in the late stance, barefoot walking resulted in decreased hip joint flexion moment (MH2), second peak extension knee moment (MK3), hip flexors absorbed power (PH2), hip flexors generated power (PH3), second peak absorbed power by knee flexors (PK2), and second peak anterior-posterior component of joint force at the hip (APFH2), knee (APFK2), and ankle (APFA2). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that it should be cautious to discard conventional elements from future running shoe designs and rush to embrace the barefoot technology fashion. Hindawi 2017 2017-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5697121/ /pubmed/29238158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2638908 Text en Copyright © 2017 Yi Xu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Yi
Hou, Qinghua
Wang, Chuhuai
Sellers, Andrew J.
Simpson, Travis
Bennett, Bradford C.
Russell, Shawn D.
Full Step Cycle Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Barefoot Walking and a Traditional Shoe Walking in Healthy Youth: Insights for Barefoot Technology
title Full Step Cycle Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Barefoot Walking and a Traditional Shoe Walking in Healthy Youth: Insights for Barefoot Technology
title_full Full Step Cycle Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Barefoot Walking and a Traditional Shoe Walking in Healthy Youth: Insights for Barefoot Technology
title_fullStr Full Step Cycle Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Barefoot Walking and a Traditional Shoe Walking in Healthy Youth: Insights for Barefoot Technology
title_full_unstemmed Full Step Cycle Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Barefoot Walking and a Traditional Shoe Walking in Healthy Youth: Insights for Barefoot Technology
title_short Full Step Cycle Kinematic and Kinetic Comparison of Barefoot Walking and a Traditional Shoe Walking in Healthy Youth: Insights for Barefoot Technology
title_sort full step cycle kinematic and kinetic comparison of barefoot walking and a traditional shoe walking in healthy youth: insights for barefoot technology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29238158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2638908
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyi fullstepcyclekinematicandkineticcomparisonofbarefootwalkingandatraditionalshoewalkinginhealthyyouthinsightsforbarefoottechnology
AT houqinghua fullstepcyclekinematicandkineticcomparisonofbarefootwalkingandatraditionalshoewalkinginhealthyyouthinsightsforbarefoottechnology
AT wangchuhuai fullstepcyclekinematicandkineticcomparisonofbarefootwalkingandatraditionalshoewalkinginhealthyyouthinsightsforbarefoottechnology
AT sellersandrewj fullstepcyclekinematicandkineticcomparisonofbarefootwalkingandatraditionalshoewalkinginhealthyyouthinsightsforbarefoottechnology
AT simpsontravis fullstepcyclekinematicandkineticcomparisonofbarefootwalkingandatraditionalshoewalkinginhealthyyouthinsightsforbarefoottechnology
AT bennettbradfordc fullstepcyclekinematicandkineticcomparisonofbarefootwalkingandatraditionalshoewalkinginhealthyyouthinsightsforbarefoottechnology
AT russellshawnd fullstepcyclekinematicandkineticcomparisonofbarefootwalkingandatraditionalshoewalkinginhealthyyouthinsightsforbarefoottechnology