Cargando…

Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine

BACKGROUND: Fellowship training follows certification in a primary specialty or subspecialty and focusses on distinct and advanced clinical and/or academic skills. This phase of medical education is growing in prevalence, but has been an “invisible phase of postgraduate training” lacking standards f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karpinski, Jolanta, Ajjawi, Rola, Moreau, Katherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29157228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1062-5
_version_ 1783280609566654464
author Karpinski, Jolanta
Ajjawi, Rola
Moreau, Katherine
author_facet Karpinski, Jolanta
Ajjawi, Rola
Moreau, Katherine
author_sort Karpinski, Jolanta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fellowship training follows certification in a primary specialty or subspecialty and focusses on distinct and advanced clinical and/or academic skills. This phase of medical education is growing in prevalence, but has been an “invisible phase of postgraduate training” lacking standards for education and accreditation, as well as funding. We aimed to explore fellowship programs and examine the reasons to host and participate in fellowship training, seeking to inform the future development of fellowship education. METHODS: During the 2013–14 academic year, we conducted interviews and focus groups to examine the current status of fellowship training from the perspectives of division heads, fellowship directors and current fellows at the Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada. Descriptive statistics were used to depict the prevailing status of fellowship training. A process of data reduction, data analysis and conclusions/verifications was performed to analyse the quantitative data. RESULTS: We interviewed 16 division heads (94%), 15 fellowship directors (63%) and 8 fellows (21%). We identified three distinct types of fellowships. Individualized fellowships focus on the career goals of the trainee and/or the recruitment goals of the division. Clinical fellowships focus on the attainment of clinical expertise over and above the competencies of residency. Research fellowships focus on research productivity. Participants identified a variety of reasons to offer fellowships: improve academic productivity; improve clinical productivity; share/develop enhanced clinical expertise; recruit future faculty members/attain an academic position; enhance the reputation of the division/department/trainee; and enhance the scholarly environment. CONCLUSIONS: Fellowships serve a variety of purposes which benefit both individual trainees as well as the academic enterprise. Fellowships can be categorized within a distinct taxonomy: individualized; clinical; and research. Each type of fellowship may serve a variety of purposes, and each may need distinct support and resources. Further research is needed to catalogue the operational requirements for hosting and undertaking fellowship training, and establish recommendations for educational and administrative policy and processes in this new phase of postgraduate education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56973832017-12-01 Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine Karpinski, Jolanta Ajjawi, Rola Moreau, Katherine BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Fellowship training follows certification in a primary specialty or subspecialty and focusses on distinct and advanced clinical and/or academic skills. This phase of medical education is growing in prevalence, but has been an “invisible phase of postgraduate training” lacking standards for education and accreditation, as well as funding. We aimed to explore fellowship programs and examine the reasons to host and participate in fellowship training, seeking to inform the future development of fellowship education. METHODS: During the 2013–14 academic year, we conducted interviews and focus groups to examine the current status of fellowship training from the perspectives of division heads, fellowship directors and current fellows at the Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada. Descriptive statistics were used to depict the prevailing status of fellowship training. A process of data reduction, data analysis and conclusions/verifications was performed to analyse the quantitative data. RESULTS: We interviewed 16 division heads (94%), 15 fellowship directors (63%) and 8 fellows (21%). We identified three distinct types of fellowships. Individualized fellowships focus on the career goals of the trainee and/or the recruitment goals of the division. Clinical fellowships focus on the attainment of clinical expertise over and above the competencies of residency. Research fellowships focus on research productivity. Participants identified a variety of reasons to offer fellowships: improve academic productivity; improve clinical productivity; share/develop enhanced clinical expertise; recruit future faculty members/attain an academic position; enhance the reputation of the division/department/trainee; and enhance the scholarly environment. CONCLUSIONS: Fellowships serve a variety of purposes which benefit both individual trainees as well as the academic enterprise. Fellowships can be categorized within a distinct taxonomy: individualized; clinical; and research. Each type of fellowship may serve a variety of purposes, and each may need distinct support and resources. Further research is needed to catalogue the operational requirements for hosting and undertaking fellowship training, and establish recommendations for educational and administrative policy and processes in this new phase of postgraduate education. BioMed Central 2017-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5697383/ /pubmed/29157228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1062-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karpinski, Jolanta
Ajjawi, Rola
Moreau, Katherine
Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine
title Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine
title_full Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine
title_fullStr Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine
title_full_unstemmed Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine
title_short Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine
title_sort fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29157228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1062-5
work_keys_str_mv AT karpinskijolanta fellowshiptrainingaqualitativestudyofscopeandpurposeacrossonedepartmentofmedicine
AT ajjawirola fellowshiptrainingaqualitativestudyofscopeandpurposeacrossonedepartmentofmedicine
AT moreaukatherine fellowshiptrainingaqualitativestudyofscopeandpurposeacrossonedepartmentofmedicine