Cargando…

Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain

The goal of this study was to capture the electroencephalographic signature of experimentally induced pain and pain-modulating mechanisms after painful peripheral electrical stimulation to determine one or a selected group of electrodes at a specific time point with a specific frequency range. In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goudman, Lisa, Laton, Jorne, Brouns, Raf, Nagels, Guy, Huysmans, Eva, Buyl, Ronald, Ickmans, Kelly, Nijs, Jo, Moens, Maarten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180894
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S145783
_version_ 1783280622999961600
author Goudman, Lisa
Laton, Jorne
Brouns, Raf
Nagels, Guy
Huysmans, Eva
Buyl, Ronald
Ickmans, Kelly
Nijs, Jo
Moens, Maarten
author_facet Goudman, Lisa
Laton, Jorne
Brouns, Raf
Nagels, Guy
Huysmans, Eva
Buyl, Ronald
Ickmans, Kelly
Nijs, Jo
Moens, Maarten
author_sort Goudman, Lisa
collection PubMed
description The goal of this study was to capture the electroencephalographic signature of experimentally induced pain and pain-modulating mechanisms after painful peripheral electrical stimulation to determine one or a selected group of electrodes at a specific time point with a specific frequency range. In the first experiment, ten healthy participants were exposed to stimulation of the right median nerve while registering brain activity using 32-channel electroencephalography. Electrical stimulations were organized in four blocks of 20 stimuli with four intensities – 100%, 120%, 140%, and 160% – of the electrical pain threshold. In the second experiment, 15 healthy participants received electrical stimulation on the dominant median nerve before and during the application of a second painful stimulus. Raw data were converted into the time–frequency domain by applying a continuous wavelet transform. Separated domain information was extracted by calculating Parafac models. The results demonstrated that it is possible to capture a reproducible cortical neural response after painful electrical stimulation, more specifically at 250 milliseconds poststimulus, at the midline electrodes Cz and FCz with predominant δ-oscillations. The signature of the top-down nociceptive inhibitory mechanisms is δ-activity at 235 ms poststimulus at the prefrontal electrodes. This study presents a methodology to overcome the a priori determination of the regions of interest to analyze the brain response after painful electrical stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56974452017-11-27 Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain Goudman, Lisa Laton, Jorne Brouns, Raf Nagels, Guy Huysmans, Eva Buyl, Ronald Ickmans, Kelly Nijs, Jo Moens, Maarten J Pain Res Original Research The goal of this study was to capture the electroencephalographic signature of experimentally induced pain and pain-modulating mechanisms after painful peripheral electrical stimulation to determine one or a selected group of electrodes at a specific time point with a specific frequency range. In the first experiment, ten healthy participants were exposed to stimulation of the right median nerve while registering brain activity using 32-channel electroencephalography. Electrical stimulations were organized in four blocks of 20 stimuli with four intensities – 100%, 120%, 140%, and 160% – of the electrical pain threshold. In the second experiment, 15 healthy participants received electrical stimulation on the dominant median nerve before and during the application of a second painful stimulus. Raw data were converted into the time–frequency domain by applying a continuous wavelet transform. Separated domain information was extracted by calculating Parafac models. The results demonstrated that it is possible to capture a reproducible cortical neural response after painful electrical stimulation, more specifically at 250 milliseconds poststimulus, at the midline electrodes Cz and FCz with predominant δ-oscillations. The signature of the top-down nociceptive inhibitory mechanisms is δ-activity at 235 ms poststimulus at the prefrontal electrodes. This study presents a methodology to overcome the a priori determination of the regions of interest to analyze the brain response after painful electrical stimulation. Dove Medical Press 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5697445/ /pubmed/29180894 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S145783 Text en © 2017 Goudman et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Goudman, Lisa
Laton, Jorne
Brouns, Raf
Nagels, Guy
Huysmans, Eva
Buyl, Ronald
Ickmans, Kelly
Nijs, Jo
Moens, Maarten
Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain
title Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain
title_full Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain
title_fullStr Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain
title_full_unstemmed Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain
title_short Cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain
title_sort cortical mapping of painful electrical stimulation by quantitative electroencephalography: unraveling the time–frequency–channel domain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29180894
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S145783
work_keys_str_mv AT goudmanlisa corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain
AT latonjorne corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain
AT brounsraf corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain
AT nagelsguy corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain
AT huysmanseva corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain
AT buylronald corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain
AT ickmanskelly corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain
AT nijsjo corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain
AT moensmaarten corticalmappingofpainfulelectricalstimulationbyquantitativeelectroencephalographyunravelingthetimefrequencychanneldomain