Cargando…

Perioperative Liver Function after Hepatectomy in a Tertiary University Hospital in Damascus

BACKGROUND: Liver resection is the only viable therapeutic treatment option for several neoplastic entities of the liver. Although, the number of resectable patients is increasing in Syria, liver failure is still a major complication affecting mortality and morbidity rates. METHODS: Between 2009 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Basel, Turkmani, Khaled, Marwa, Mohamad Essam, Ahmad, Tareq, Baghdadi, Ramez, Aboudamaah, Shaimaa, Alkhatib, Khetam, Ahmad, Mohamad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28843230
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2109
_version_ 1783280628985233408
author Ahmad, Basel
Turkmani, Khaled
Marwa, Mohamad Essam
Ahmad, Tareq
Baghdadi, Ramez
Aboudamaah, Shaimaa
Alkhatib, Khetam
Ahmad, Mohamad
author_facet Ahmad, Basel
Turkmani, Khaled
Marwa, Mohamad Essam
Ahmad, Tareq
Baghdadi, Ramez
Aboudamaah, Shaimaa
Alkhatib, Khetam
Ahmad, Mohamad
author_sort Ahmad, Basel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Liver resection is the only viable therapeutic treatment option for several neoplastic entities of the liver. Although, the number of resectable patients is increasing in Syria, liver failure is still a major complication affecting mortality and morbidity rates. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2016, 104 patients undergoing liver resection in Damascus University Faculty of Medicine were retrospectively analyzed. Liver function tests were conducted before surgery (ps) and in the perioperative period (po) and comparisons were performed with division into anatomic VS non-anatomic or malignant VS non-malignant groups. RESULTS: Liver synthetic, excretory and detoxifying functions deteriorated after liver resection (INR ps ‘presurgery’=1.129 po ‘perioperative’=1.426 P<0.001, TP ps=7.426 po=5.581 P<0.001, ALB ps=4.204 po=3.242 P<0.001, T-Bill ps=0.061 po=0.136 P<0.001) and liver cell necrosis increased after resection (ALT ps=27.597 po=200.221 P<0.001, AST ps=33.395 po=190.553 P<0.001). There was no significant difference in liver functions when we compared anatomic VS non-anatomic groups or malignant VS non-malignant groups, but liver cell necrosis was higher with malignancies (ALT malignant group=236.475 non-malignant group=89.5 P=0.002, AST malignant group=222.644 non-malignant group=101.125 P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Although liver resection affects liver function significantly, no differences in outcomes were found between anatomic VS non anatomic or malignant VS non-malignant groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5697468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56974682017-12-01 Perioperative Liver Function after Hepatectomy in a Tertiary University Hospital in Damascus Ahmad, Basel Turkmani, Khaled Marwa, Mohamad Essam Ahmad, Tareq Baghdadi, Ramez Aboudamaah, Shaimaa Alkhatib, Khetam Ahmad, Mohamad Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: Liver resection is the only viable therapeutic treatment option for several neoplastic entities of the liver. Although, the number of resectable patients is increasing in Syria, liver failure is still a major complication affecting mortality and morbidity rates. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2016, 104 patients undergoing liver resection in Damascus University Faculty of Medicine were retrospectively analyzed. Liver function tests were conducted before surgery (ps) and in the perioperative period (po) and comparisons were performed with division into anatomic VS non-anatomic or malignant VS non-malignant groups. RESULTS: Liver synthetic, excretory and detoxifying functions deteriorated after liver resection (INR ps ‘presurgery’=1.129 po ‘perioperative’=1.426 P<0.001, TP ps=7.426 po=5.581 P<0.001, ALB ps=4.204 po=3.242 P<0.001, T-Bill ps=0.061 po=0.136 P<0.001) and liver cell necrosis increased after resection (ALT ps=27.597 po=200.221 P<0.001, AST ps=33.395 po=190.553 P<0.001). There was no significant difference in liver functions when we compared anatomic VS non-anatomic groups or malignant VS non-malignant groups, but liver cell necrosis was higher with malignancies (ALT malignant group=236.475 non-malignant group=89.5 P=0.002, AST malignant group=222.644 non-malignant group=101.125 P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Although liver resection affects liver function significantly, no differences in outcomes were found between anatomic VS non anatomic or malignant VS non-malignant groups. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5697468/ /pubmed/28843230 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2109 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Ahmad, Basel
Turkmani, Khaled
Marwa, Mohamad Essam
Ahmad, Tareq
Baghdadi, Ramez
Aboudamaah, Shaimaa
Alkhatib, Khetam
Ahmad, Mohamad
Perioperative Liver Function after Hepatectomy in a Tertiary University Hospital in Damascus
title Perioperative Liver Function after Hepatectomy in a Tertiary University Hospital in Damascus
title_full Perioperative Liver Function after Hepatectomy in a Tertiary University Hospital in Damascus
title_fullStr Perioperative Liver Function after Hepatectomy in a Tertiary University Hospital in Damascus
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Liver Function after Hepatectomy in a Tertiary University Hospital in Damascus
title_short Perioperative Liver Function after Hepatectomy in a Tertiary University Hospital in Damascus
title_sort perioperative liver function after hepatectomy in a tertiary university hospital in damascus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5697468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28843230
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2109
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadbasel perioperativeliverfunctionafterhepatectomyinatertiaryuniversityhospitalindamascus
AT turkmanikhaled perioperativeliverfunctionafterhepatectomyinatertiaryuniversityhospitalindamascus
AT marwamohamadessam perioperativeliverfunctionafterhepatectomyinatertiaryuniversityhospitalindamascus
AT ahmadtareq perioperativeliverfunctionafterhepatectomyinatertiaryuniversityhospitalindamascus
AT baghdadiramez perioperativeliverfunctionafterhepatectomyinatertiaryuniversityhospitalindamascus
AT aboudamaahshaimaa perioperativeliverfunctionafterhepatectomyinatertiaryuniversityhospitalindamascus
AT alkhatibkhetam perioperativeliverfunctionafterhepatectomyinatertiaryuniversityhospitalindamascus
AT ahmadmohamad perioperativeliverfunctionafterhepatectomyinatertiaryuniversityhospitalindamascus